{ "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:59 AEST", "title": "Lanto YouTube Training Cards", "purpose": "transcript_training_cards", "not_holdout_dossier": true, "source_root": "/workspace/nitro-setups/lanto_youtube_pass", "shots_root": "shots/lanto_youtube", "ranking_note": "Keyword heuristic PROP_FIRM / FILTERS_ENTRY / RISK_RECOVERY + shared A+ over transcript+title — not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by FILTERS_ENTRY then PROP_FIRM.", "channel": "@lantotrades", "totals": { "remaining_locked": 40, "completed": 40, "failed": 0, "caption": 40, "whisper": 0, "charts_ok_ge3": 40, "charts_weak": 0, "skipped_newest": 3 }, "count": 40, "cards": [ { "id": "p4VJmRLSRlg", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$3,100,000 Day Trading! (NOT CLICKBAIT)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4VJmRLSRlg", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 1, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 6.3, "shared_a_plus_score": 10.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 14741, "duration_seconds": 759, "chart_count": 18, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 42.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 84.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 126.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 168.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 210.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 252.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 295.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 337.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 379.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 421.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 463.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 505.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 547.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_14.png" }, { "file": "chart_15.png", "t_sec": 590.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_15.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_15.png" }, { "file": "chart_16.png", "t_sec": 632.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_16.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_16.png" }, { "file": "chart_17.png", "t_sec": 674.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_17.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_17.png" }, { "file": "chart_18.png", "t_sec": 716.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_18.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/p4VJmRLSRlg/chart_18.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "p4VJmRLSRlg", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$3,100,000 Day Trading! (NOT CLICKBAIT)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4VJmRLSRlg", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 759, "view_count": 14741, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 14556, "transcript_path": "p4VJmRLSRlg/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 42.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 84.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 126.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 168.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 210.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 252.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 295.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 337.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 379.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 421.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 463.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 505.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 547.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_15.png", "t_sec": 590.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_16.png", "t_sec": 632.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_17.png", "t_sec": 674.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_18.png", "t_sec": 716.5 } ], "chart_count": 18, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "short", "long", "stop", "target", "take profit", "fair value gap", "liquidity", "sweep", "bias", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "p&l", "profit", "loss", "making", "losing", "session", "nq", "es", "execution" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 6.3, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "risk management", "drawdown" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "fair value gap", "bias", "session", "london", "new york", "invalidate" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:49 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I made over $3 million trading. I know that sounds absolutely absurd, but that's the truth. Made $3 million trading from an accumulation of overnight trades and then New York. Today, I'll be reviewing that, going over exactly what I did. And in this video, you'll find out my bias, my plan, and my execution to it all. So, with that being said, let's get into it. An insane day, a record day for your boy. Um before this, my record day was in April where I made 1.1 mil, I think, in a day. Today, obviously, trumps that, made over $3 million, made over $2.4 million on one account. And here is the account. On the top right, you can see the P&L listed $2.4 million. And just to certify it, you go to account reports, you can see it is a live account. $2.4 million on one account and over $3 million combined. Um with that being said, let's get into it. So, the first trade I ended up taking, it was two trades, mainly, was an overnight session take. It was a trade determined via the Asian session, which I had taken a short on the Nasdaq, NQ. So, what was my bias? Well, then what was the trade and what was my bias? Well, the result and the outcome of the trade ended up closing out realization about a 40R. This also now is my biggest trade of all time R wise, an insanity type of trade. Um And then, we ended up seeing price, or excuse me, we ended up um Excuse me, excuse me, I'll say it again. We came into the open, I came into the open with a bearish bias. If we go to higher time frame here and I get started on terms of the bias, it all starts from the daily time frame. This is the same thing that we talked about a couple reviews ago or the last review a couple days ago is looking at the daily time frame. You guys know, back in April, I was very bullish with price. I kept on longing, longing, longing. Every trade I took for quite some time was a long. The reason you see me thrive and take a short today and be able to thrive is because I'm playing with market sentiment and that's what I was doing when we were trading at all-time highs. A great way to always gauge price through higher time frame is keeping it simple all the way through. What you want to look for is you want to look for a price on the daily time frame to A, what type of candles are we having? Are we having engulfing candles, doji candles? B, are there more bullish or bearish candles here? And you could see consistently throughout the daily time frame in this push up every time we were always consecutively met with engulfing bullish candles and anytime we had bearish candles, which was very minimal, every time you would see price not be as engulfing. And if we did see a sell sequence back down, we always saw price trade into an imbalance and almost every time we tapped that imbalance, we traded back up. Well, if you look at price today and coming into today looking at the daily time frame, we were seeing price actually start starting to violate those imbalances. If you look at the 4-hour for example, you see consistently we do see retracements or red candles, but we don't see price create lower highs. We don't see We don't see price create lower lows. You don't see price invalidate these higher lows. What you see coming into today's open, what you see price to consistently is start to create higher lows. That's what we do here. That was the first indication. Paired up with that, we had bullet or bearish SMT off the all-time highs with ES and NQ as NQ created a new high whilst ES did not. So, kind of coming into the Asia session for last night, well, I dumped it down. Now that we have a gauge of our higher time frame outlook saying that we were bullish in April because we were seeing price consistently trade up and now we're bearish because we're seeing those imbalances get wiped out giving you bearish indication that price wants further more lower, we then went to lower time frame and, you know, it could be the 15-minute time frame. It could be the 30-minute time frame. What you see me look for here is I look for price to tell me lower time frame that it wants to trade lower. You have You guys have to realize it's as simple as this. Higher time frame get a gauge of your bias, Lower time for my bias is to simply time it up. If that makes sense. Higher time frame, overall picture. Lower time frame, timing the picture, if that makes sense. That's what I was looking for here. And you see, you know, initially through New York the previous day, yesterday, we see a beautiful push up here through New York. A beautiful buy up. But what do you see after hours do, which is historically one of the non, you know, one of the parts of the stock market which never moves? After hours, 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. When do you usually ever see that happen? Never. But you end up seeing price be so bearish to the point where we ended up dumping after hours. Not only that, through the interest of the Asia open, we see price also dump as well. So, kind of a continuation here. 5:00 or 6:00 was closed. Asia opens at 6:00 p.m. And we see price continue off that. And so, all I was looking for now was a potential entry model to trade lower. Again, higher time frame dictated bearish bias because we see higher time frame imbalances get wiped off. Again, one more time. We did not end up doing that at any point in time when it came to April and seeing price push up. Had we, you could have possibly seen me flip my bias and narrative to lower. But being that we had seen consecutive days now this week where you see price seek lower displacement in every which way possible, that gave me the interest in lower. So, this short intent here, the first uh trade that I ended up taking was the short and it was a simple continuation model of what we did through our after hours and through the Asia open. It was still a bit risky because you were looking for more displacement here in this continuation and no massive liquidity was taken out yet. There was no perfect entry. But we see price create a 5-minute bearish fair value gap where we then see price come up and initially violate it, turn it into a bullish inversion fair value gap. But what what do we do? We see price come right back down and we see price eventually violate that 5-minute bullish inversion fair value gap. So, that's a bearish sequence. We take out our entry. And where stop could have honestly been placed this route of high, but I wanted to give my trade a bit more breathing room and I placed my stop this 5-minute wick high, just giving it a bit more breathing room in the case we saw price enter and then come back up and then sweep this high and then come back down lower. We then see price go right away and we see price get smashed. And what I ended up doing for this trade right here specifically is I ended up scaling in as time went on. So, as we would see lower and lower and lower, I would scale as price would give me more indication that it was more bearish and leaning towards more downside. You would see me scale in. That's right there with this trade. Now, keep in mind, I had my stops in place. I had my trail stops in place. We end up consolidating for the bulk sum of overnight price. Then, we see price through New York start to come down here. Well, my bias for New York was very similar. What I was looking for was for downside because again, although we end up seeing price come down here and we see liquidity being taken out in previous day low, you never see price showcase an interest in reversal. Like we said, going back to the higher time frame narrative, you see a low get taken out. And what you always want to see when it comes to reversals back higher is what you see here, right? What you see here. You see true bullish displacement back up. Look at this hourly reference here. Look at this hourly reference here. Look at this hourly um reference right here. These type of displacement sequences are very engulfing. Now, if you look at the hourly time frame on when we took out this low precisely, did we look the same? No. It was a lot more consolidative. It told you that although we had many attempts to trade higher and we saw some type of retracements, it was never fully there, which told me that price most likely could trade lower. If you wanted to see reversal in the market, we have we would have already seen it. We then come back down here and utilizing our opening range move, which is typically the first move after New York open into an area of liquidity being an overnight high or low, that helps us give us give us a gauge with our New York bias. So, we are already naturally bearish through Asia. We end up holding this trade, chop chop chop chop. We eventually end up seeing price come down >> [snorts] >> and see price come down here in our opening range move ends up being a very bearish one where you see New York come down and you see New York take out Asia lows. Um and from there, you see price essentially ultimately Oops. You see price essentially ultimately trade lower. Uh just [snorts] to kind of reference, through New York here as well, we end up seeing our London low get taken out, which was the true opening range move as New York open. Then we had the move and then we see price continue lower. At no point in time did price ever once tell me that it was going to be bullish here. A lot of people get confused or a lot of traders, they see a large move in the market, they're like, \"Yeah, it can't be going down much more. So, why not look for longs? Why not look for longs? We're late on shorts. We're late on shorts. Why not look for longs?\" Well, that's how important it is to get a gauge of your bias. If you're just simply looking at price within the last 15 minutes, you can't really get a gauge. We've looked at higher time frame. We've looked at overnight price and we've looked at the opening range move and all three factors have been A+ with our bias. Keep in mind, as we're hunting a potential trade through New York here, I'm still holding this NQ trade which I ended up trading and taking overnight. We see price sell and sell and sell. We had draw targets in mind and you could see me kind of mention my outlook in the morning in which I wanted to see price do. Eventually, we end up taking our first trade which did end up uh being a half hour loss. Our first entry in the market, it was a bit premature, but the entry briefly discussed was a 1-minute >> [snorts] >> inversion entry similar to the second trade where we wanted to see price come down, invert, and then look for these equal lows to get ran at this higher time frame low level in 7505. We end up coming down here, inverting, but ultimately never ended up seeing true the true turnaround. We ended up taking our second entry off a very similar entry. This was based off combining two 1-minute gaps. This right here is a very similar entry to the first one except our timing's a bit better on this one, because we wait for more of a displacive sequence back up, a bit of a retracement, a failed move, and then a move back down. We then end up taking our entry here, where we ended up seeing price come down and violate where you eventually see me say, \"I am short.\" You see me mention my exact target entries, and then you also see me mention exactly where my break even is, and what I'm looking for. Obviously, ahead of time as well. Not only on live do you see my real-time thoughts and the trade idea present, but you also see it via text beforehand. I I alert it boom, and then we take the trade. Boom, targets mentioned, and then we have a after a bit of consolidation and a bit of drawdown, we end up seeing price come down, and then our first target of interest was discovering [snorts] this new week opening gap, and we end up seeing price smash that. The difference between today and any other day is you're seeing every time we've taken out a low of significance, we've always seen price what? Engulf and trade with speed under that low. Every time we do that, that's an indication that the next level can most likely get taken out. Whenever we're done with trend, whenever we want to see reversal in the market, we end up taking a low, and we end up seeing a displacive move back up right away. How often do you see price take out a low, a high, and then reversal chop for so long, and then end up seeing a move back up? For me, specifically, I like what I see price come down, take an area, come up, take a high, and then after taking that, we see displacive immediately, right? Because that tells you not only is liquidity taken, but price is also starting to turn around as well. So, here was the ES trade, a beautiful entry. Again, reminder, we took a half hour loss in the morning. Then, we end up seeing price come down here, and we end up taking this trade. Take profit one got smashed. If you guys don't know, we have a specific way on exactly how we scale. If you go to the Lanto's model section of the Discord, we have specific channels for certain things, and under risk management, there's a video tied in there, which tells you exactly how I trim on each type of account. And if you follow this video, you are wise would be the up the exact same amount of money as I would be, as we've discussed on reviews, you know, previously, as we've done a lot done a live on live a lot of times as well. So, we end up taking this trade and we end up seeing price go, go, and go where we eventually end up realizing this trade for a closure at around an 8R. Alert-wise, this counts as a 4-hour trade via 1R risk, if that makes sense. So, we have dedicated days, a schedule essentially. Every single day of the week, you know exactly how much Lento risks are-wise and relative. And essentially, today we end up taking this trade, but since we were half our risk, it's an 8R trade, but through 1R risk, it's a 4R trade, if that makes sense. Not to confuse you guys too much. But, a beautiful trade nonetheless, and we see validation in price. After TP1, chat, all it is is simply trailing your stops and letting price go. We kept on doing that over and over and over again. You see me consistently mention anytime I did anything. And then we see price go. And obviously, the community banked and we did a boatload of money today trading and just an awesome day overall. So, that's pretty much it. That's the review. Hope you guys enjoyed it and a career day. Hopefully, one day in the future, Lento, you can look back at this video and you've topped this day, but we'll see if it ever happens. Peace out, y'all.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/p4VJmRLSRlg" }, { "id": "t2xKfcNSpO4", "content_type": "video", "title": "IFVG + FVG: The Setup Behind My Best Results", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2xKfcNSpO4", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 2, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 6.4, "shared_a_plus_score": 10.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 12751, "duration_seconds": 942, "chart_count": 20, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 47.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 94.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 141.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 188.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 235.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 282.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 329.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 376.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 424.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 471.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 518.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 565.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 612.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_14.png" }, { "file": "chart_15.png", "t_sec": 659.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_15.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_15.png" }, { "file": "chart_16.png", "t_sec": 706.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_16.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_16.png" }, { "file": "chart_17.png", "t_sec": 753.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_17.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_17.png" }, { "file": "chart_18.png", "t_sec": 801.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_18.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_18.png" }, { "file": "chart_19.png", "t_sec": 848.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_19.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_19.png" }, { "file": "chart_20.png", "t_sec": 895.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_20.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/t2xKfcNSpO4/chart_20.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "t2xKfcNSpO4", "content_type": "video", "title": "IFVG + FVG: The Setup Behind My Best Results", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2xKfcNSpO4", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 942, "view_count": 12751, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 17403, "transcript_path": "t2xKfcNSpO4/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 47.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 94.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 141.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 188.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 235.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 282.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 329.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 376.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 424.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 471.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 518.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 565.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 612.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_15.png", "t_sec": 659.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_16.png", "t_sec": 706.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_17.png", "t_sec": 753.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_18.png", "t_sec": 801.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_19.png", "t_sec": 848.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_20.png", "t_sec": 895.2 } ], "chart_count": 20, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "orm", "long", "confirmation", "trigger", "stop", "target", "fair value gap", "fvg", "liquidity", "sweep", "bias", "setup", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "loss", "session", "futures", "es", "execution" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 6.4, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "stop loss", "revenge", "fomo" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "fair value gap", "fvg", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york", "invalidate" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:58 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Last year, I made over $3 million trading prop firms. I've had some of the biggest payouts in the industry, period. And it's not because of one indicator I've magically kept. It's not because of a bot, it's because of one thing that most traders butcher, entry. You can have the right bias, you can have the right insight, you can have the right everything, but if your entry is bad, you'll get stopped out every [music] time. Then you'll revenge trade and blow your accounts over and over again. Trust me, I've seen it happen with myself. So today, I'm giving you my full entry model, [music] the exact way I enter the market. We're talking about FEGs, IFEGs, and even If you watch my last video where I broke down the ORM strategy, higher time frame analysis, overnight price, [music] and the opening range move, this is part two. This is where we go from learning how to read a chart to executing. The $3 million entry model. Looking to get funded? Smart Prop Firm [music] is your all-in-one platform for exclusive deals on top futures prop firms. Get the best discounts available [music] and earn smart points to redeem free evaluations. Plus, get a free eval every month with our payout bonus when you trade [music] with top prop partners like Lucid and Tradify. Visit smartpropfirm.com through the link in the description [music] to maximize your trading benefits. Two steps to every trade. Step one, know where higher time frame analysis gives you your bias, the opening range move gives you the confirmation. One, higher time frame magnets, swing points, fair value gaps, inversion fair value gaps. Two, overnight range, Asia and London sessions build the setup. Three, opening range move confirmation, New York open drives into liquidity. Step two, pull the trigger. How you get in determines your risk, your timing, and your edge. One, FEG entry, patient, wait for the retest. Two, IFEG entry, aggressive, ride the inversion. Three, golden entry, both stacked, highest probability. Let's get into it. Higher time frame recap, the roadmap. On the 4-hour and daily, we're finding two things, the targets price wants to reach. One, swing points, a large wick before reversal. The market aggressively moves, creates a massive wick, then reverses. That wick is liquidity getting swept, market. Two, fair value gaps. Fair value gaps and inversion fair value gaps created with displacement, aggressive impulsive moves, and after liquidity was taken. Let's get into the graphics. You have an empty plain chart with nothing drawn up on it showing you exactly what a chart typically would look like if you just were to load in for the first time. And here is your after. This is how I mark up my higher time frame narrative utilizing fair value gaps and inversion fair value gaps and swing points. Before, you had noise, now you have a roadmap. Let me show you a real example. Here is your 4-hour gap. But there's also one thing you guys aren't seeing. You have a 4-hour gap over here. Lento, why mark two gaps in one zone? What does that even mean? Stay tuned for later. But here we go. We have a 4-hour bearish gap. And then we also have a 4-hour bullish gap at this point in time. This is where the markets have bottomed out. Now Lento, where are the swing points? Well, one, you have here. Two, you have here. And three, you have here. So, we marked out the 4-hour, have we acknowledged the daily yet? No, let's take a look at it. The daily also had a fair value gap right here. You have a one-day fair value gap where price comes back down into alongside a one-day previous bearish gap which had turned a bullish inversion fair value gap. Stay tuned for later, again. And now, on the hourly time frame, we see an hourly fair value gap which is large in displacement and has taken previous liquidity. So, let's mark out this final gap here. As you can see, these swing points also hold value on every time frame as we marked out these on the 4-hour, but these still hold validation on the hourly as well. So, we've marked out our daily fair value gaps, we've marked out our 4-hour gaps, and we've marked out our hourly gaps alongside our swing point levels. Next step, the opening range move trigger. Layer on the opening range move framework. Wait for New York to sweep the overnight level, then watch for the reaction. One, Asia/London sets the overnight range, builds the trap. Two, New York open drives it to Asia/London higher low. Three, the sweep, initial move into overnight liquidity. Four, the reaction, confirmation, the market shows its hand. The key insight. You now have your bias, you know where the higher time frame targets are, you now see the opening range move confirmation. Entry model now. So, after marking out our higher time frame narrative, we now simply wait for the opening range move, which if you haven't watched the last video, we talk about our first move off our New York open into an area of liquidity, typically Asia/London session high or low. This is a great visual example as you see an hourly gap get tapped into the real high, and then you see a bearish opening range move. Let me show you a real example on the charts. So now that we've identified what price has done via higher time frame, all we simply do now is wait for 9:30 a.m. and to see what price does off the open. Let's see how it goes. So, here is your New York open. This is our New York open at 9:30 a.m. Now, all we do for the opening range move is simply wait for price to react either off this London low or this London high. The reaction will confirm or deny our higher time frame outlook, which is for higher. So here you have it, you have your opening range move. After tapping this large higher time frame array, we see price come back up and we see price take out its London high. There's your initial move. Now, the reaction. Let's see how the next candle reacts. And there you have it. We have an initial retracement candle followed by an engulfing bullish candle looking to trade past the London high. So, what does that tell you? It tells you that price is clearly looking for a breakout past these London highs. So now that we've identified our higher time frame outlook via the rebalances with the arrays and the opening range move trade bullish, all we simply do is look for our entry model. Two entries, that's it. The FEG entry and the IFEG entry. The FEG entry, the patient entry. Price makes an impulsive move leaving an imbalance. Wait for price to retrace back into it. One, identify the imbalance. Price moves impulsively and leaves a gap, fair value gap, market. Two, wait for a retrace. Don't chase, let price pull back into the imbalance zone. And three, enter the retest. Price proves the level holds, that's your entry. Pros and cons. Pros for an FEG entry is it forces you to be patient, there's no FOMO entries. It naturally is tighter, better priced entry. And three, retest equals real confirmation that the level holds, best for reversals. But it also comes with some cons. In strong moves, price may never retrace. The move could leave without you, and it could lead to forcing bad entries by widening the zone, worse for continuation. So, I will say FEG entries are great for both, but there are cons to either looking for reversal or continuation. Let's show you guys an example of both. So, here's a good example. You have a fair value gap retest, and then you also have an inversion fair value gap retest. So, what you're looking for price to do here off a fair value gap entry is you're looking for price to come down, retrace into the fair value gap, seek a rebalance in a healthy sequence where we bounce off the gap and look for higher. Here's what you don't want to see price do. You don't ever want to see price come down into an imbalance, see a bullish reaction, but then come right back down after. What you need is strong displacement in price. Let me show you an example. So now that we've identified our higher time frame outlook being bullish and the opening range move confirming our bias, what we're now simply looking for price to do is offer an entry in the market to ride into higher draw. Our higher draw targets become our higher time frame narrative because our lower time frame and higher time frame both have lined up. Let's see if we get one. Okay, so past the opening range move, price is looking for a breakout potentially riding into this draw. What we're now looking for price to do is simply offer a retracement into a clear gap which is displacive and or has taken out previous liquidity. What do we do here? We do both. Here is our marking, 1-minute gap. Same way we mark out higher time frame gaps. What we're now looking for price to do is retrace into the gap, which we have by touching and wicking the 1-minute gap. Now, we're looking for a healthy candle to confirm interest in drawing higher here. Let's see if we get that soon. And there it is. There is your candle bouncing after seeing a retracement into the imbalance confirming that, okay, now price wants to seek higher. Let's mark out the risk reward and see how this trade pans out once you have entered this trade. So, the stop loss I'm going to be using for this trade is our model stop, which is typically the fair value gap candle wick low or the fair value gap candle wick open. So, we either go stop loss off the open of the candle or we go off the bottom of the candle. Let's see how the trade pans out. And boom, a beautiful move. We see targets smashed eventually here where you see price come up and you see price run 24244. So, what do we have here? Higher time frame outlook being bullish by rebalancing off higher time frame arrays, then you have your opening range move be bullish by coming out of the gap, and then we simply look for an entry in the market. Now, this you would count as a continuation entry in the market. It has its cons, but it's still very effective. One key tip I'm going to throw in the video is if you have ever want to identify if you want to take a continuation model trade, simply look at the pace of price. You can see here that clearly along the way coming into this opening range move, you see the pace of price and how strong it was in displacement by consistently seeing engulfing moves up and rarely retracing. Our first retracement since the open was right here after London had taken out liquidity, and what do you see price do? Immediately come right back up. And even off our entry, we see price come into this gap, barely tap the entry point, and then see it go. When price does that, it tells you that it's very bullish and it's trying to seek higher now. The IFEG entry, the aggressive entry. An inversion fair value gap is a previous fair value gap getting disrespected, price runs through it and flips direction. Previous bullish fair value gaps exist. Price was supposed to respect this gap going up. Price blows right through it. The old level is disrespected. That gap is now inverted. Three, the inversion equals your entry zone. Once it inverts and turns, you're in with the new direction. Pros and cons. Pros, speed. The market already showed its hand. Two, high follow through and probability from entry. And finally, perfect for trending continuation moves. Best for continuation. So here are the couple cons. On reversals, you can absolutely get faked out. Without enough data, your entry could be premature. Your entry could essentially just be a retracement in the market as opposed to a reversal. So here's another example. The inversion fair value gap entry. What you're looking for price to do is have an initial bullish gap, see price come down, disrespect it, turn it into a bearish inversion fair value gap, where you then see price come back up and invalidate that. So what I essentially mean is you're looking for a previous good bullish zone to turn bearish for price then to invalidate that bearish sequence, completely voiding that sell at all. So going back and using the same example, we initially marked out our fair value gap entry. Now, let's mark out an inversion fair value gap entry. Well, right here, after seeing the opening range move occur, what you're looking for price to do after initially inverting the swing low and gap is you're looking for price to what? Come back up and invert the bearish inversion fair value gap. So what do we see happen here? We see price, two candles later, come back up here and successfully seek engulfing closure back above the gap. So we see price retrace, invert the swing low and gap, which is displacive and also a gap in which took large liquidity being overnight highs, and then you see price come back up here. You see price going from a bullish fair value gap back to going into a bearish inversion fair value gap, where we then see price come back up and invalidate that bearish inversion fair value gap. So what do we do from here? We simply take entry in the market once price has confirmed, which for me is an engulfing candle closure above. You have your stops either placed the swing low, or you could be based off the second most recent swing low. On the 1-minute time frame, same objective. Mark out the high. What do we then see price do? We see price ultimately successfully run into that high utilizing an inversion fair value gap entry. And boom, there you have it. The cheat sheet. Reversals, it's best for FEG entries. It's not the best for IFG entries. Continuation, it's pretty risky for FEG entries, but it's a lot better off for IFG entries. Fair value gaps for reversals, IFGs for confirmation. Now, when I say this again, I don't mean don't take fair value gaps on continuation models. Don't take inversion fair value gaps in reversal patterns, but I find the most probability through utilizing these two different things. Now, let's talk about the golden entry. The highest probability entry. Fair value gap plus inversion fair value gap in sync. Two rebalances in one move. Double confirmation. Number one, 5-minute chart. Fair value gap zone, price retraces into it. Step number two, drop to the 1-minute time frame. Inversion fair value gap forms from inside the 5-minute zone. Number three, execute. Let's take a look at this visual. So on this visual, where you have a chart showcasing two different arrays. What you're looking for is you're looking for a 5-minute array to sync up with a 1-minute array. So let me show you a real example that I took with my Discord live while trading this past Tuesday. So here is the example. Potential in play, 1-minute IFG trade, bullish setup. So here's the graphic off the initial idea. It was a 1-minute gap that went invert. All I was simply looking for price to do was retrace, offer rebalance, and then send higher. However, we then ended up seeing a 1-minute gap get formed after this inversion fair value gap had held its respect. You see price come back up, you see a closure over, and then you see price ultimately come back down here and retrace with equal highs set in place. So this is it right here. You then see me mark it out and simply mark out my stop loss off the trade if it presented off the 1-minute gap entry, with the stop loss being the swing low, and the ultimate target being higher. Then on the Discord, you clearly see me mention, \"I am long.\" We then end up taking this trade, and let's see the outcome of this position. So there you go. After initially identifying our bias utilizing overnight price, utilizing the opening range move and higher time frame narrative, we were able to get a gauge of price being bullish and looking to be more bullish. So then, all we simply did was use the golden entry zone, where we then see price showcase two bullish sequences off arrays, where we then look for continuation in the market. We then take our trade, and we see price fulfill our targets almost instantly. Beautiful trade, caught on live. Just as solid as stone, double confirmation. 5-minute fair value gap rebalances, zone is valid. 1-minute inversion fair value gap gets disrespected, the timing is now. So in the example I showed you, it wasn't a 5-minute gap that got rebalanced. It was a 1-minute gap that got rebalanced. However, it operates the same way on both time frames. I use 1-minute confirmation looking for an engulfing sequence. Why this is the best entry. Your 5-minute fair value gap gives you the patience play. You wait for the retrace. Your risk is small. Your 1-minute IFG gives you the precision. You're not blindly entering the zone. The market showed you it's ready. This is the entry that funded my accounts. The complete entry model. FEG entry for reversals, patient retest confirmation at tighter risk. IFG entry for continuation, aggressive momentum confirmed, fast execution. The golden entry. FEG plus IFG in sync, double confirmation, highest probability. So there you have it. That's the full entry model. Fair value gaps, inversions, how I use them, and when you pair both, you have your golden zone entry. Go back and watch this video with the chart open. Pause the video if you need to to mark out your swing points, your fair value gaps. Just simply refine and keep looking for that golden entry zone. If you like this video, comment what entry model you think you're going to be using in the future. To join my community, everything's linked in the description. I'll catch you guys in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/t2xKfcNSpO4" }, { "id": "h0SVib2ClhE", "content_type": "video", "title": "Do This Before You Enter Another Trade", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0SVib2ClhE", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 3, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 1.6, "shared_a_plus_score": 10.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 6597, "duration_seconds": 811, "chart_count": 20, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 81.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 121.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 162.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 202.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 243.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 283.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 324.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 364.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 405.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 446.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 486.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 527.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_14.png" }, { "file": "chart_15.png", "t_sec": 567.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_15.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_15.png" }, { "file": "chart_16.png", "t_sec": 608.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_16.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_16.png" }, { "file": "chart_17.png", "t_sec": 648.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_17.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_17.png" }, { "file": "chart_18.png", "t_sec": 689.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_18.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_18.png" }, { "file": "chart_19.png", "t_sec": 729.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_19.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_19.png" }, { "file": "chart_20.png", "t_sec": 770.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_20.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/h0SVib2ClhE/chart_20.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "h0SVib2ClhE", "content_type": "video", "title": "Do This Before You Enter Another Trade", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0SVib2ClhE", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 811, "view_count": 6597, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 14901, "transcript_path": "h0SVib2ClhE/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 81.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 121.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 162.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 202.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 243.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 283.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 324.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 364.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 405.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 446.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 486.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 527.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_15.png", "t_sec": 567.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_16.png", "t_sec": 608.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_17.png", "t_sec": 648.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_18.png", "t_sec": 689.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_19.png", "t_sec": 729.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_20.png", "t_sec": 770.4 } ], "chart_count": 20, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "orm", "long", "confirmation", "trigger", "stop", "target", "fair value gap", "fvg", "liquidity", "sweep", "bias", "setup", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trade", "profit", "loss", "making", "session", "scalp", "futures", "es", "execution" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 1.6, "keyword_hits": [ "stop loss" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "fair value gap", "fvg", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:54 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Every single trader I've coached always had one similar issue when they came to me. They had setups, they had entries, but this one thing is what held them back. They had no idea what higher time frames were telling them. They'd sit staring at the 1-minute chart for 6 hours trying to take any education that pops up and always get stopped out. Damn. All right, guys. We got stopped out. >> Damn it. Okay, I got stopped out. Down bad right now. I'm down bad. Guys, here's the one thing that nobody tells you about when it comes to scalping. Scalping isn't just entirely about the lower time frame. The 1-minute, the 5-minute time frame, those are for executions. But, how do you get your insight? How do you know where price is going to go? That comes from higher time frame. Those time frames are what set up your foundation to your trade. And if you don't use those, if you just use the 1-minute time frame, well, you're essentially just gambling. This is a total gamble. Don't follow me. I have no idea what I'm doing. Oh, yeah. What happened? Today, I'm giving you the entire higher time frame outlook, the exact one I use every single day to be able to help you with my trading. This is the video I wish existed when I first started trading. The higher time frame framework. Four time frames, two things, every trade. Looking to get funded? Smart Prop Firm is [music] your all-in-one platform for exclusive deals on top futures prop firms. >> [music] >> Get the best discounts available and earn smart points to redeem free evaluations. Plus, get a free [music] eval every month with our payout bonus when you trade with top prop partners like Lucid and Tradify. Visit smartpropfirm.com through the link in the description [music] to maximize your trading benefits. Scalping does not equal lower time frame trading. The 1-minute chart is for execution. The decision comes from above. Higher time frame analysis gives you the complete picture. No matter if you're a swinger, a scalper, an intraday day trader, if you don't use higher time frame tools to your advantage, you'll never have consistent success utilizing smaller time frames. You need to know where the bigger picture is supposed to be, the complete picture. One, the daily, the picture on the box. Two, the 4-hour, the outer edges. Three, the hourly, the corners. Four, the 30-minute, the intersections, and five for the one and five-minute, the final piece of the puzzle, the middle. There it is. Swing points and key levels, the magnets. On every time frame, identify where the market reversed. There are typically liquidity pools, the magnets price is drawn to. One, external highs and lows. The most recent significant high and low. Price is ultimately going to take one of these. That's the game. Two, internal swing points. Pull back highs and lows inside the range. Traders have stops here, the markets know it, and it's coming for them. Three, fractal alignment. A higher time frame internal will that forms your bias, which matches your lower time frame structural framework, creates a high conviction entry. The higher time frame sets the road map, the lower time frame maps the entry. So, in this graphic, you have your higher time from the left side, and you have your lower time from the right side. What you're looking for us to do on the higher time frame, is you're looking for a price to create a significant swing point, be a high or a low. Then, what you're looking for price to do on a 30-minute time frame, is you're looking for price to come down into that low, or come up into that high, take that area, and showcase a clear move. So, I believe price is fractal. If you don't know what that is, stay tuned. But, essentially, I believe this is a daily internal low, this daily wick low is equivalent or equally as important on the 30-minute time frame. This internal low on the daily time frame acts as an external low on the 30-minute time frame. The drill down. One, macro bias. The road map, narrative, and destination. Two, structure. Mark internal/external swing points. Three, identify drawing magnets. Fair value gaps/inversion fair value gaps. Four, lower time frame entry. Find the identical setup inside the zone. The charting truth. Start at the macro and work your way down. You do not need a different strategy for each time frame. A fair value gap is a fair value gap. A sweep is a sweep. Whether it's a weekly chart or one-minute chart, we chart every time frame the exact same. The only difference is the outcome duration. All right, so what you see right here is a blank chart. Nothing drawn up, nothing done yet. Let's go ahead and start marking out our levels. First thing we do, start on the daily time frame, top down. Remember, daily, 4-hour, hourly, and 30-minute. So, what do we do here? Well, all we have to do is mark out swing points and mark out clear imbalances in sight. Let's start off first. If you guys remember, a swing point is typically a lower or a high put in where you then see price reverse. So, on this daily time frame, you can see this is clearly a low that we put in where we then saw a reaction off. All right, what next? Well, now let's mark out our imbalances. First things first, you have a daily fair value gap imbalance here, which we'll go ahead and mark out. You have a bearish gap, and then you have another bearish gap right above it. So, with these two gaps in sight and the swing point marked out right here, I think we're going to start off. Now that we've gone out of the 4-hour time frame, let's mark out a couple imbalances in sight that are clear as day. Well, here's your first one. We have a 4-hour gap, which also happens to be inside a daily gap. Let's go ahead and mark that. Then, you also have another 4-hour gap sitting above, which also happens to be inside another daily gap. And there you have it. Now, let's go down to the hourly. On the hourly time frame, there's nothing too major on here. Let's go down to the 30. Yep. Likewise on the 30-minute time frame, not much has gone on. We can mark up these two arrays, but we don't necessarily need them as we have clarity through higher time frame. So, what this means is it means that no matter what time frame we operate, as I just showed you, I mark out the charts the same way every time. If it's a 1-minute gap, a 5-minute gap, a 30-minute gap, an hourly gap, etc., I mark it the same way every time. All I'm looking for are key swing points, as we talked about, and fair value gaps that are displacive and or which have taken liquidity. The best imbalances quality filter. Not all gaps are equal. The best imbalances share three qualities. One, created with displacement, big aggressive candle bodies, the market was making a statement, not uncertain. Two, took liquidity while forming. The move that created the gap also swept the swing point. That's institutional strength. Three, dominant body to wick ratio. Body means conviction. Wicks mean uncertainty. You want conviction. Example, one day has an IFVG, 30 minute has a BPR inside of it equals the money zone. Two, four hour has a fair value gap and inside that fair value gap you have an hourly fair value gap stacked with it, also the money zone. Here's a quick representation. You have a daily fair value gap right here that you clearly had marked out with clear displacement. What you're then looking for price to do via lower time frame such as the four hour or the hourly is you're looking for price to tap that daily fair value gap whilst also tapping a four hour or hourly gap. So, you have your daily gap here met, you have the hourly gap get tapped into on this example where you then see a daily gap and an hourly gap beautifully aligned. And as you guys see here, we have two prime examples. A daily gap being open alongside a four hour gap inside of it and also another daily gap with another four hour gap inside of it. Multi-timeframe alignment. Price is fractal. What the market does in a daily, it does in a lower time frame. The structure is identical. The fractal truth. Finding bias higher time frame. Daily, four hour, hourly, 30 minute, the macro picture. One, swing points, key levels and targets. Two, fair value gap {slash} inversion fair value gaps, the reaction zones. Three, stacked imbalances, highest conviction bias. Four, multi-timeframe alignment, A+ level confirmed. Finding entry lower time frame. Five {slash} one minute, the exact same concepts for execution. One, swing points, entry zones and stop placement. Two, fair value gap {slash} inversion fair value gaps entry triggers. Three, stacked imbalances, highest conviction entry. Four, five plus one minute conversions, A plus entry equals golden zone. So, right here you can clearly see that we believe that price is fractal. The same way that higher time frame operates, so does lower time frame. The complete sequence, higher time frame gives you the story. Opening range move gives you direction, lower time frame gives you the entry. Step one, higher time frame analysis. Daily, four hour, hourly, 30 minute. Mark swing points. Mark imbalances. Find convergent zones. Step two, opening range move confirmation. The overnight range builds. New York sweeps the overnight higher or low. Reaction confirms or denies bias. Step three, entry. Five minute fair value gap rebounds. One minute inversion fair value gap trigger. Same fractal pattern. Execute. The full picture. The five minute FVG at one minute IFVG stacking inside your higher time frame zone. That's the golden entry from video two. Same game, every time frame fractal. Here's a visual representation of your opening range move and your clear entry model after it. Let's show you a real example on the chart. And so now that we've went through that slide show and we've identified that price is fractal and my conviction is that I believe every time frame operates the same, let's see how price does here. Well, now we've marked out our higher time frame objectives, imbalances, and swing points. Now our job's to find out what price does from here. If we zoom to the five minute time frame, what we're able to see is we see price successively put in a low, then see a sweep of the low on the next session coming back up. What we did see price do is trade in a state of consolidation. So, if we are higher time frame, what we're able to see is a low being put in, a low being swept, and a bullish move. Two large components in identifying a MSS trade. So, utilizing that same concept on higher time frame, we dump down a lower time frame, and all we wait for here now is the opening range move. Let's see what we do. All right, and here's your New York open. You have your opening range move being a move into London highs. Here's the initial move and now the reaction will either confirm or deny our higher time frame outlook, which is bullish. Let's see. And there we go. A successful move past our London high showcasing that price via lower time frame wants a breakout. But again, what's the advantage here? We don't just have a lower time frame look. We have a higher time frame look. So, basing off higher time frames, what we're able to see is that after we had swept our lows and swung point, and we saw price come back up off the opening range move, we now also have levels to work off and where price could draw into. We have a daily fair value gap entry, midpoint, and fill alongside a 4-hour fair value gap entry, midpoint, and fill. And now what we look to do is being that our bias is bullish, we simply look for a continuation entry trade here. So, after the initial opening range move and after a bit of time, what do we see price do? Holds fair value, and we see price trading back at highs. Now, we're going to simply look for a continuation model trade, and we're going to take it the same way we marked out higher time frame. Well, how do we do that? Well, our stop placement, our entry, and our targets all will be based off the same way we marked out higher time frame. Our targets will be off our higher time frame levels in the 4-hour gap and the daily gap. And then our lower time frame entry will be off a 1-minute fair value gap retest and entry. And then our stop loss will be based off a swung point, the same type of swung point that we marked out through higher time frame. So, let's go. 1-minute fair value gap, clearest gap in sight, also a very displacive gap, which also took liquidity being high of day. We then mark out our entry waiting for a simple rebalance. Again, stop loss being the swung point, looking for a full fill as our ultimate target and partializing as the trade goes up higher into these objectives. Because keep in mind, this could be our ultimate target, but at any point we could see price reject off the 4-hour daily CE. So, all we're trying to do here is be safe whilst in this trade. Here is our retracement into the 1-minute gap. Now, let's see if price rebalances off the gap, respects it, and we see a bounce back up. And so, after a couple minutes, what do you see price do? You see price come back up here, and you see price close over the gap, respecting it. So, therefore, we have our entry right here, our stop loss being the swing point, and then we simply look to ride now. Let's see how this trade pans out. And right away, instantly, we see profit target get smashed. Now, I will say this is pretty volatile, but ultimately, you see draw getting met. And now, if you look at higher time frame, what were we able to see? Is we're able to see our 4-hour and our daily gap both getting violated and both running through, therefore, giving you conviction and price running higher. So, in situations like this, once your higher time frame and lower time frame align, clearly, you simply look to trail and ride higher. So, there it is. What have we done? We've identified our higher time frame outlook the same way we identify lower time frame. We simply combined, waited patiently, and executed when it was there. And here's your complete higher time frame framework. Four time frames: daily, 4-hour, hourly, 30-minute. Start from the top, work your way down. Every layer adds detail. Swing points, internal and external levels, where liquidity lives and where price is drawn to. Imbalances, fair value gaps, inversion fair value gaps, BPR, quality gaps with displacement, liquidity sweeps, and conviction. Convergence, when multiple time frames agree on the same zone, that's your highest probability setup. Fractal truth, higher time frame concepts equal lower time frame concepts. Learn one, you've learned both. Same game, every scale. If you haven't watched video one, where I go into the opening range move, or video two, where I go into my entry models, go ahead and watch them. They're linked in the description. These three videos together give you the complete system. I'll see you in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/h0SVib2ClhE" }, { "id": "0scAzDQ-jYc", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$77,000 Day Trading After Losing The First Trade! (FOLLOW YOUR PLAN)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0scAzDQ-jYc", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 4, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 6.4, "shared_a_plus_score": 10.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 3053, "duration_seconds": 521, "chart_count": 13, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 80.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 120.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 160.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 200.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 240.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 280.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 320.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 360.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 400.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 440.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 480.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0scAzDQ-jYc/chart_13.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "0scAzDQ-jYc", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$77,000 Day Trading After Losing The First Trade! (FOLLOW YOUR PLAN)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0scAzDQ-jYc", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 521, "view_count": 3053, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 10840, "transcript_path": "0scAzDQ-jYc/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 80.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 120.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 160.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 200.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 240.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 280.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 320.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 360.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 400.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 440.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 480.8 } ], "chart_count": 13, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "take profit", "fair value gap", "liquidity", "bias", "setup", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "loss", "making", "losing", "session", "nq", "es", "execution" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 6.4, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "drawdown", "invalidation", "psychology" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "fair value gap", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york", "invalidation", "invalidate" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:47 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm up over $77,000 on the trading day, and in this video, you'll see exactly how I was able to do that through my bias, my trade, and my execution. All done live in front of 700 plus people. If you're curious on what the trade was, the trade was right here. We took a beautiful long on ES after coming in and having a specific game plan. But, before we get into the trade, well, let's talk about exactly what we were looking for. So, coming into the open, we had a bullish bias. Looking at this real quick, a simple overview of why we had that bullish bias, well, three things, three main components. If you haven't watched my video going over exactly how I identify my bias, go back and there's a video on my YouTube channel, you know, precisely talking about it. Well, for this year specifically, in terms of today's session, had three components line up and I had my A+ bias. Well, let's get into it. First things first, higher time frame outlook. The first thing we recognized via higher time frame and is was how engulfing we were. Higher time frame bullish via trading four-hour fair value gap. If you look at the four-hour fair value gap here on both ES and NQ, what you're able to see is we had a very large and displace of four-hour gap. We see price come up and we see price raid that four-hour gap. Alongside that, we saw a very engulfing sequence through the new week opening gap, which is where you see your Friday close and your Sunday open meet, and we see a very bullish sequence. From there, I simply identified what I wanted to see price run into in terms of targets. First target of interest was this hourly and four-hour wick high. Right above that, you have your all-time highs. Next component, overnight price. If you guys know me, I'm a large advocate in using extended trading hours. Overnight price precisely was an area of interest where I wanted to see price move well in order to identify our bias a bit better, and that's what we did. Coming into the open, we had a glance at overnight price, and what did we see price do? Well, we see we see price gap up almost 1,000 points, maybe a bit more, and on top of that, not one point in time did we see price retrace at all through Asia and the bulk of London. You see price consistently create higher lows here, and you see price engulfingly or be consistent in the engulfing sequence and constantly create new highs. So, for me specifically first two components higher time frame and overnight price, you could see that as clear as day coming into New York New York open. At least at the very minimum overnight price was very bullish. Well, what is the final set piece in identifying our bias? It's the opening range move, which if you guys don't know, it's the first move off our New York open into an overnight higher low where we see the reaction and base our judgment and bias off it. So, us being bullish already through the higher time frame outlook in the 4-hour time frame and us seeing price engulf overnight and see price consistently trade bullish through Asia and London, all we need in New York do to do off the open with showcase interest in higher. Well, what do we do here off the open in terms of our open interest? We see price come up here in our London high created before the open and we see price engulf over and we see price cause a bullish reaction. So, now we have our higher time frame outlook, now we have our overnight price outlook, and now we have our opening range move. trade bullish. So, all three align and all we're now looking for here price is to clear up and take a clear entry model. Well, before we had our winning trade, we actually ended up taking a loss. We took a loss on an ES long, which we ended up taking off a 5-minute gap entry. So, after identifying our bias, we stuck to ES because we looked at ES and NQ in reference and we identified that ES was slightly more leading. We take the trade and we see price come down here and tap us 5-minute gap where we then confirm off this entry precisely at 10:03 a.m. Again, I want to make this a you know, reference or I want to be important with this real quick. You don't see me blindly enter longs. We have a large identity in terms of what our bias wants to be, what you know, we expect price to do. If price wasn't as clear with components in our bias, we wouldn't be looking to be risk on here. So, it's not cuz we're just taking a trade just to take a trade. Our bias is identified, we recognize that price is bullish, and now we're looking for an entry model. We see price come up here 5-minute tap, we then see price come back up here in a beautiful confirmation sequence. Despite the outcome of this trade, we had a beautiful confirmation sequence at 10:03 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. Unfortunately, price wanted to retrace a bit more before giving that second look. So, you see me mention that right right here. You see the setup. No longer true provided, excuse me, that was the first idea. This is the second idea here which ended up confirming and giving us a trade entry. From the gap tap, boom, you mentioned I am long and then we eventually end up getting stabbed out. Well, I think the reason and invalidation off this trade was to simply due to price wanting a replacement. But, here's the important thing. Wait, so we got stopped out here. Like, how do I provide these stop outs or how do I avoid these stop outs in the future? Well, here's the thing. Sometimes you're going to get stopped out even when you have the right bias or your bias is A+. You're going to sometimes get stopped out. The important thing is you size appropriately. And on a day like today, if you're in the room in the Discord, you know we are half our risk Mondays and Fridays. We half size on the week because we believe that Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursdays are the best moving sessions historically, right? So, we're basing off that. We go half risk here. We come down, take a loss. We're half or down. If you size appropriately, you are completely fine. And after this happened, I referenced and I talked to my chat about the importance of having the proper sizing needed and we simply looked for re-entry, right? Our bias wasn't, you know, invalidated here, you know, unless we saw a price come down here, shift back down, and completely you know, mitigate the opening range movement and see price heavily trade back down lower. Price was still there. I will say the one point for this trade right here specifically that took the L on, it's a bit a bit unfortunate because we ended up getting essentially bottom wicked off this invalidation point. We had this stop being this relative low. I In my belief, I thought if price were to come down here and close under, you know, there's a good chance we could see price come down and it trade even lower which is a good invalidation point. Here's the thing that happened though. We saw price wick the low instead. So, that was a bit unfortunate and it is what it is, but again, we simply stood patient and we were looking for price to clear up. Here's the thing I recognized. With price and how it was here before taking our second entry, we had recognized that price was slowing down, a bit more consolidated, right? We weren't as aggressive in terms of upside as we were off the open. So, for me specifically, I knew had we taken a second entry in order to offset this bad price, we would simply have to use a bit bigger of a stop. And that was kind of the outlook that we had here, right? Potential re-entry. Seems ES and NQ are even just slower than it opened. Idea here is the 1-minute bearish gap into a bullish inversion gap stop run of low. Break even stops once high of day's ran at target 7641 right here. And that was kind of the ideology. This is a 1-minute gap entry. Was this 1-minute gap as big as the 5-minute gap? No. But, however, we had swept internal liquidity and my bias was still there completely. We didn't see invalidation of that bias. Remember that. We come up here and we eventually provide entry again off a beautiful confirmation sequence where we see price engulf and seek a nice closure. Our confirmation candle on this trade was 10:29 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. We end up having our stop again based deep route of low. A bit wider, but again, in order to offset the potential risk of getting wicked out in choppy price. And here's the thing. We see price enter and we immediately deal with some drawdown initially. And the good thing about this stop is that we didn't get wicked out, right? Had we had our stop say this low, this route of low just because we wanted a better R on a trade potentially, we would have gotten bottom wicked. But, instead, we used price and we used structure to our advantage and use utilizing our system, we based our stop route of low, gave the trade breathing room in case we wanted to see a bit of a retrace, which is what it did, and then eventually came back up here and we saw price go. Um and we see price come up here and we see price take out that high of day, go risk free the moment that does happen. You see me mention that via right here after saying I am long, I am break even stops. We then eventually trail our stops as price goes higher and higher and higher to eventually where we see price ultimately smash our take profit goal, and that TP1 being that hourly internal high. At the time of this recording, I'm still holding this trade with trailed stops. Um I realized most of it on my props and >> [clears throat] >> you know, ideally, we'll see how the rest of this trade pans out. But, at minimum, a day where it was very good, right? Our trade Our a trade was a half hour loss and our second trade was a plus one R or in terms of half hour day size, our first trade was a minus one R and our second trade was a plus two R off TP1. And you see me kind of mention that in here. And the one thing I want to reference real quick is how awesome seeing my system and my model come into fruition for these traders in our community, right? These dope ass people because you see them just absolutely showcase their wins and their absolute, you know, mega trades that they held with us, right? You see you see it over and over again. You see these paths obviously you can just go into the testimonials channel. Awesome. But I think the most important thing that I want to stress when it comes to this review is the importance of your psychology. We didn't freak out after initially getting stopped out. We simply stuck to our plan and kept moving forward, right? And now we're green on the day because we stood patient and we finally had a second entry, adjusted, and saw the reward get panned out. $77,000 on the day, a beautiful session, and with that being said, that's the review. Hopefully you guys enjoyed it. Catch you guys in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/0scAzDQ-jYc" }, { "id": "qbZfXO1ZJb4", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$89,000 in An Hour of Trading! (Patience Pays!)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbZfXO1ZJb4", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 5, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 4.8, "shared_a_plus_score": 10.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 2702, "duration_seconds": 616, "chart_count": 15, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 82.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 123.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 164.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 205.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 246.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 287.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 328.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 369.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 410.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 451.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 492.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 533.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_14.png" }, { "file": "chart_15.png", "t_sec": 574.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_15.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/qbZfXO1ZJb4/chart_15.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "qbZfXO1ZJb4", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$89,000 in An Hour of Trading! (Patience Pays!)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbZfXO1ZJb4", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 616, "view_count": 2702, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 11766, "transcript_path": "qbZfXO1ZJb4/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 82.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 123.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 164.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 205.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 246.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 287.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 328.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 369.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 410.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 451.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 492.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 533.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_15.png", "t_sec": 574.8 } ], "chart_count": 15, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "textbook", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "take profit", "fair value gap", "liquidity", "sweep", "bias", "setup", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "making", "session", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 4.8, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "psychology", "fomo" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "fair value gap", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:52 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I made over $90,000 day trading the Nasdaq and I did it through taking one trade. This is the trade right here and in today's video, I'll be going over exactly what I did in order to define what my bias was and to define the entry model for today's trade. Again, another day where we were one and oh. If you guys have seen in the past week or so, I've only did recaps for the three days or two two days because we've only traded two days last week. We've been extremely patient getting back to our patient system and we've been getting rewarded. Last week we closed over a five hour on the week and we've only traded two days last week. Three days were break even. We still went live. We still did everything we usually did, but bias or entry model or both were not clear at what point in time. The two days we took a trade, they were. We capitalized. Today, came into the market, traded the PM session, and capitalized a trade which I made over $90,000. Yesterday closed or last week closed for over $200,000 in the week. This trade here alone made over $90,000 across all my accounts combined. So, a beautiful day. Well, let's all break it down for me. How the hell did you get this? So, what how did you get here? Well, first things first, this morning I had a flight so I couldn't be very productive on the AM aspect of today's trading session. Um I had no Wi-Fi on the plane. A boomer plane, I don't know what it was. Um but here was my insight before I took off coming into the New York open. Simple post here saying, \"Good thing for reference, higher time frame is the four hour. Quick annotation. Last night via the Asia open, we had seen a large push back to NQ at all time highs. Asia took and London saw a sweep of the high. Since the sweep, we have slowly traded into this four hour fair value gap where we have filled near perfectly. Watch the reaction. If we hold this gap coming into New York and the opening range move is bullish, can look to play upside. If we don't hold or see the opening range move violently through the four hour fill and invert, expect lower. Higher time frame four hour to the opening range move which would be lower time frame. All I looked for All I looked for in finding this via higher time frame was the largest gap in zone, happened to be the 4-hour for value gap today, and happened to be London low put in place. So, essentially, what I was looking at here for the 4-hour time frame was this 4-hour gap. This 4-hour gap was pretty significant at this point in time because it was a 4-hour gap, which was created coming up and displacing through all-time highs. Someone asked me in chat earlier, \"Lanto, why was this gap significant over the others?\" Well, two main components, as we always talk about when it comes to identifying fair value gaps and inversion fair value gaps, the best fair value gaps, in my eyes, are gaps that have you know, are displacive, one, and gaps that take liquidity. And you can see in this sequence, we have both. Displacive gap, on top of that, we had this gap displace and take all-time highs. So, we had seen Asia come up here, a beautiful move up. These two 4-hour candles are Asia. Then we had seen London kind of sweep back down and see a move back down into this 4-hour gap fill. Now, the reaction off this ideally would have dictated bias. Here's what happened, though. We had seen the reaction occur before the opening range move, which would be right after your your New York open. If you don't know what the opening range move is, it's typically where you have your first move after New York open into an area of liquidity, typically an overnight high or low. We did not end up having this uh occur in terms of in terms of the timing aspect. We ended up seeing the move happen before the open. However, what we did end up doing off the open was ended up seeing a beautiful push back up after initially coming down here and taking our one one of our targets of interest. You can see in this post here, I said 15-minute look, if we happen to see the move occur before the opening range move, look for the opening range move to validate further on, and then it can look for continuation in the direction of it. Key spot here, key levels below the 4-hour gap fill, Asia lows, 30,291. So, that was one of the low that we had marked out. And you see price come down here in the low of day that we ended up creating for the entirety of the day, including all sessions, happened to be around that 30,291 level. What what ended up doing off the opening range move, which after this New York open, was seeing a bit of a pump. The unfortunate thing I guess with today is the fact that we had not seen a textbook opening range move sequence, which was like ideally come down here, take out London lows, and then see the reaction back up. We didn't see any massive liquidity being taken out. Um but we did end up seeing structure after London had taken out this Asia low, then a push back up. Lentil, would you have done well trading AM today? I probably would have sat out due to the likelihood of the combination of the opening range move not being the best and price action not trading the best. But if I were to take a trade, I probably would have taken this 5-minute gap go invert um long back up after we had developed structure. A bit tougher because we had seen a good move off the open through New York here. You guys know me, I don't trade the New York opens. So this this trade here I I would have not taken, you know, a 5-minute gap go invert specifically here because I don't trade the opens directly. I look for a clear move and this 9:30 candle or this this candle right here which inverted this 5-minute gap was the 9:30 candle. So it was either I take this here or I don't take anything at all. Um didn't end up doing anything because again my Wi-Fi was out. Came back to Puerto Rico, landed, got back in here and like 2 minutes after I stepped inside my I'm still not even unpacked yet. Um um I went on the charts and I went live and my bias coming into the PM session was pretty clear. After seeing that low being taken out, although we had this 4-hour initiative, we see price violate on the 4-hour yes on that 4-hour gap. We do do that. But here's the thing. We end up coming down here and we see a combination of a good low, structure, and the opening range move come back up and completely violate the entire bearish sequence that we came back down here. Chat, you have to remember, we're trading at all-time highs. It's very hard for me to have a neutral bias here. I naturally sway bullish because we're trading all-time highs. It's just you playing with market sentiment. I found always through over time, when you play with market sentiment, you and you play with trend, you typically have a lot better of a probability in your trades. And so, for me, it's naturally a thing here where I tend to usually slightly um lean bullish. Am I going to do that every day? Entirely, no. If we were trading at yearly lows, if this was vice versa, I would naturally lean slightly bearish because of market sentiment. And so, we see price come up here. My bias PM bias is very clear. Again, good structure, good low, a sweep of the low that we end up seeing through Asia lows. The important thing here is we end up also creating higher lows. ES was a bit weaker here. So, the reason you see me take on NQ today is because ES wasn't as strong at that point in time. The first idea that we had in mind after our PM bias was developed, which was bullish again because of the fact that we had seen this move through AM, a good push through to the New York session, and then also a continuation of higher lows being created in our London highs and all-time highs being left wide open and draw. Our first idea was a long in mind that we had, which was a 5-minute bearish BPR violation. If you guys have looked at the past two recaps, this is the exact same setup I've been taking. BPR violation. So, I'm looking for a bearish BPR on this sequence to get violated. I did that for the last two trades I took, banked. The unfortunate thing with this sequence here was we ended up seeing the confirmation candle hit TP within the same candle, if that makes sense. So, on the 1-minute time frame, if you go here to the exact time of when this occurred, you see right when we go in for it, it happened on this candle. But, this candle confirms and closes after already taking out the high. So, a pretty displacive candle, obviously news oriented. Um and it could be very frustrating. I think what's key for anyone who's watching this video, this is a key key point, is take a look at how I did not FOMO in. I did not get upset. I did not, you know, immediately buy back into the market just because we were pumping. And I had a bullish bias, and I wanted to see higher, and we did see higher, but I wasn't able to capitalize, right? Um I simply stood patient, right? Simply moved on. And a great piece that I ended up mentioning in the mental we had chat was confirmation candle hit T uh hit TP the same time frame. I don't expect anyone to have caught that. So, I kind of mentioned that. But then you you see you see me say, um \"On to the next setup. Do not FOMO here. Plenty more time and trades to go.\" So, this is literally like a minute or two after this confirmation candle had hit TP within the same candle of confirming, which is very rare, but it happened here. Um And you see within like 5 to 10 minutes after we end up taking a trade with which ends up paying out and ends up, you know, validating what I said here. The next idea was a very similar concept. It was a, you know, re-entry idea where we had looked for a simple 1-minute gap go invert bearish gap go invert with the same thesis of believing that price will trade higher past all-time highs into all-time highs and past it. Um the stop idea was kind of the same, route of low, break even once highs got taken out. And our take profit one interest for this trade was 30,650, which was a psychological level. Um That was the ideology here. Um And you know, we end up seeing confirmation eventually pan out the trade pretty nicely. And we see price go. You see me mention break even off high day, boom boom boom. And you eventually end up see or you see me mention I am long at the confirmation sequence. And this trade here confirms directly at right here, 1:37 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. Your model fill on this trade is 30,595, which is the closure of the candle. We end up coming here going risk-free a couple minutes after. And then we see take profits get smashed. Um a 2R trade on this position here again by simply being patient and simply looking into our bias, into our model, and waiting until it showed up. A lot of new traders, what they do is they, first off, they don't even have a system. Second of all, if they do, they get they're still too impatient psychologically or psychology-wise, they're still not in tune with their emotions enough and still FOMO trades. Chat, do you do you realize how much money there is to extract in the market if you simply follow a system over time? I've never met a trader, and this is from personal experience as well, who has gambled their way into millions of dollars, right? There's a systematical data way you approach the market. That's what we do, right? Last week we traded 5 days and only took trades on 2 days. This week, you know, first day of the week we took a trade, we went 1 for 1, right? So, that's how it is. That's how trading is sometimes, and you just going to have to adapt and be patient. That's the most important thing. So, with that being said, hope you guys enjoyed this review. I'm going to catch you guys in the next one. Peace out.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/qbZfXO1ZJb4" }, { "id": "kOmp9b1ID2c", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$42,000 LIVE Using This One Entry Model! (STUPID SIMPLE)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOmp9b1ID2c", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 6, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 3.2, "shared_a_plus_score": 10.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 2647, "duration_seconds": 710, "chart_count": 17, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 83.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 125.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 167.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 209.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 250.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 292.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 334.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 376.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 417.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 459.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 501.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 543.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_14.png" }, { "file": "chart_15.png", "t_sec": 585.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_15.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_15.png" }, { "file": "chart_16.png", "t_sec": 626.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_16.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_16.png" }, { "file": "chart_17.png", "t_sec": 668.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_17.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/kOmp9b1ID2c/chart_17.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "kOmp9b1ID2c", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$42,000 LIVE Using This One Entry Model! (STUPID SIMPLE)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOmp9b1ID2c", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 710, "view_count": 2647, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 13865, "transcript_path": "kOmp9b1ID2c/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 83.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 125.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 167.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 209.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 250.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 292.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 334.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 376.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 417.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 459.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 501.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 543.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_15.png", "t_sec": 585.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_16.png", "t_sec": 626.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_17.png", "t_sec": 668.6 } ], "chart_count": 17, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "orm", "short", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "take profit", "fair value gap", "fvg", "liquidity", "bias", "setup", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "loss", "making", "session", "nq", "es", "execution" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 3.2, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "stop loss" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "fair value gap", "fvg", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:58 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "I made over $42,000 day trading today using this one entry model. In today's video, I'll show you exactly how I did that from my buys all the way into taking entry and seeing take profit get smashed. First day back in Jersey, phenomenal one visiting my parents. Very excited. Let's get into it. So, we ended up coming into the Asia session last night being a bit more neutral. A lot of times I'll look into Asia in case Asia trades well so I can get a head start for the trading session. And kind of coming into last night initially, wasn't really looking at it too aggressively. However, we then ended up seeing Trump um talk about a ceasefire with Iran causing a lot of volatility in the market. So, with that, I ended up looking to go base off Asia and looking to potentially go risk on because off the open, we ended up seeing tremendous volatility, volatility we have not seen in months in the market. And we ended up seeing price really push off aggressively. So, if you look at NQ here, obviously looking at the bulk of New York, New York hasn't really done much in comparison. Asia ended up pumping a total of 800 points. 800. Very aggressive. Like I said, I wasn't too one-sided kind of coming into the open a bit more neutral as I usually am on sessions through Asia because Asia Asia typically tends to usually trade slower. However, through the open, we ended up seeing price come down here initially, wick down for the new day opening gap, and then tremendously expand. For me, we ended up seeing some buy-side targets get hit initially. However, for me and how price was engulfing, it was clear in my mind that price wanted to draw higher. Now, Lento, what were your targets above that? Well, if you go to the 4-hour here, looking at the 4-hour, we had a 4-hour internal high, right? A wick high, a swing high, um a swing point as well. And we also had a daily internal high. These two levels right here specifically were levels of draw where I wanted to see price get into or get hit into ultimately. And we ended up seeing price ultimately do that. So, for me, being bullish off the open, what I was looking to do was simply looking for price to retrace in the market and give me a continuation entry model. Obviously, off the open, I'm not expecting price to rip this much so I can't take a reversal trade or I can't take a trade super early. I then just proceed to take a trade later on. And so for me, the way I was able to dictate how price was still continuously healthy and that price was going to continue to trade higher was that price was consistently making, you know, uh new highs after seeking retracements, right? We retrace here, obviously minus wick, we see price trade higher. Retrace here, trade higher. Retrace here, trade higher. Retrace here and ultimately trade higher. By the time we got here, I was fancying a potential retrace into an imbalance where we rebalance and then come back up, right? So, exactly, the first idea of the day was a long here where we ended up going base off of 5-minute bullish fair value gap. Now, this is not the BPR entry because this trade ended up resulting to a break-even trade. You see me mentioning here clear Asia trend, liking the potential and upside. Idea is 5-minute 5-minute 5-minute fair value gap rebalance to have CE and move back off it. Stop loss could be the swing point or the model stop loss. Target the 4-hour BPR fill one-day internal high. Those two targets were I wanted to see price draw into. Lento, why have such aggressive take profits in mind? Because price is aggressive. When price is aggressive, you step on the pedal. We ended up seeing price come up here. We ended up taking this trade here off price rebalancing on the 5-minute gap. We take entry. I mentioned I'm long. However, this trade goes break-even because it's not we were bearish. It was more so price was uh at a state of consolidation, right? Price was choppy understandably after seeing a 600-point rip, you're going to expect to see price start to slow down again. So, Lento, if price is chopping, why the [ __ ] would you take another trade? Well, here it is. One price and two, the type of entry. And this type of entry is called a BPR violation. It's a balanced price range violation, which if you guys don't know what a balanced price range is, it's essentially where you have two gaps in one time frame in one zone. Let me break it down. The second idea right here specifically was the BPR entry idea, 5-minute bearish BPR forming. Balanced price range. If we see a violation of it creating a bullish sequence, can look to re-enter longs. Same targets as last trade. So, with this here specifically, you have a bearish BPR. And what we're looking for price to do is violate it. So, a bearish BPR includes you uh um bear Excuse me, a bearish BPR includes a 5-minute bullish fair value gap which turns into a bearish inversion fair value gap. And then you also have a 5-minute um um bearish gap which you want to see price turn into a bullish inversion fair value gap. So, a violation of both sequences and you end up seeing a price ultimately come back up here and you see price ultimately look to draw higher, right? So, with me specifically, Lento, price was choppy off the first trade. If you know price is so bad, why not why would I take a second trade? Well, this is a big key component, right? If we have two imbalances which are theoretically bearish because we end up inverting this 5-minute gap on the 1-minute time frame, which is what I use confirmation for. For me, I feel okay. Bullish gap inverted. However, we see price come back up, come back up and invert this bearish inversion fair value gap, and then also invert this bullish or bearish fair value gap, what's what's stopping price price from drawing higher, especially with price already drawing up 600 points through the ceasefire news? Why would price not look to reach another, you know, 100 2-point 200-point pump just continuing off what we had already done into draw targets. That was my mindset. So, we ended up seeing a price come up here. We see a violation of two gaps, not just one as typical traders use, two gaps. Double confluence, extra confirmation, which is what we look for. We ended up seeing price come up here. You see me mention confirmation. We ended up placing stops off the swing low targeting the 4-hour BPR fill and also the daily internal high. We eventually ended up seeing a price come up here. You see me post executions. It was a slow trade at first, but we see price ultimately go and we see take profits smashed. Beautiful trade. You see price smash take profit one, which is a 1.6R. That's first target. We then go risk-free, right? If you haven't already, then we look for that take profit two being 25210, which is ultimate take profit. We see price come up here and we see profit target smashed. You kind of see me make a joke here, but I pretty much said, \"Yeah, we're going to draw into that target. Could put my net worth on the line.\" We ended up doing that. Very successful trade, very good trade. And off this right here, we could easily very much so called it. We could have called it a night. We could have called it a day. With my mentality and how I approach trading, I have a one-and-done mindset, right? If you're already asking yourself as a trader, how many times a day does your model present an A+ trade? For me, it's maybe once or twice, if that. So, for me to catch an A+ trade and capitalize tremendously, conclude your day and move on. You guys have to remember, trading is a long-term approach. It's You won't make You won't become rich overnight, right? It's a process where you have to get better and better and better over time. And eventually, you get to scale up a lot more quickly. So, we ended up taking the trade, come down here, and then we end up waiting until New York. The thing with London is, we didn't see much go on. We saw Asia rip targets. London pretty much just slowly chopped up into higher draw kind of extending a bit off of what we did through the ceasefire news. Then we ended up seeing price off the open essentially not really do much, right? Off the open, a bit consolidation prone, but then we ended up seeing price or we we ended up seeing price um come down here and we see price run into our London low. If you guys don't know what the opening range move is, I utilize the opening range move. The reason I do that is because I like to utilize a combination of overnight price and a combination of New York open to get a get dict or get get a gauge of what price is going to do. So, for me specifically, I use higher time frame, I use overnight price, and I use opening range move, right? And so for me specifically, in coming into the open, I was pretty bullish. A, because we had seen a 600-point move overnight. B, higher time frames are pointing upside draw. And C, the opening range move here, if it could hold bullish, would confirm that. The opening range move is key though. If you guys have If you guys don't know what the opening range move is, simply click on my YouTube channel, go back. You have a perfect video explaining exactly what the opening range move is talking about that. So, we ended up looking at this idea. The idea was model um stop loss looking for a 1-minute or excuse me, a 1-minute gap to go invert. We don't end up getting this trade. And so for me, the reason I was so comfortable with potentially putting risk on for higher here is because, again, with those components alongside the fact that price had put in a low of day initially off a 4-hour gap entry, a 4-hour fair value gap entry. And as you guys saw through the trade that we took last night, the first trade that went break-even, you see the 5-minute gap get tapped into. You see price rebalance, and then you see price go. That's [clears throat] how I view imbalances, right? When when you see price come down, rebalance off a gap, and then you see price come back up, that's telling you that price has filled liquidity, filled the void. Now we come back up and we see price trade back above. There should be no purpose in price coming back down here at this point in time after touching the midpoint of this gap or an entry off a gap unless it wanted to seek lower like the fill. And that's why I'm saying mindset with every time frame. And so for this 4-hour gap entry, we see New York put in a low of day off this, but then we ended up seeing price come back down, and we ended up seeing price take that low and look to trade lower. So, for me at that point in time, this no longer looks like a bullish setup. This more so looks like a lower high and lower lower trend, right? A bearish trend. Because we come back down after initially tapping and bouncing showing a bullish reaction off that 4-hour gap entry. If we're so bullish, we shouldn't need to see price come down and put in a new low, right? We should see price rebalance and go. Just like we had that Asia trade last night be. So, we ended up seeing price come down. From there, flip narrative, and instead of looking for higher, I simply looked for lower in the 4-hour gap entry or 4-hour gap fill and the hourly gap entry below it, right? Large array through higher time frame be just because we saw a 600-point rip within 15, 20 minutes, 30 minutes, whatever it was. So, pretty aggressive. Then you end up seeing me flip narrative and look for this potential short. This short idea here specifically was a 1-minute BPR violation again. Last night's Asia successful take was a BPR violation. This trade right here was also a BPR violation except a bear We're looking for a bearish trade here. So, last night's take, bearish BPR violation, this one's a bullish BPR violation. You can clearly see we have a 1-minute bearish gap turn into a 1-minute bullish inversion fair value gap with this candle. And then you also have 1-minute bullish bullish fair value gap right here as well. So, you have two bullish gaps right here at this point in time. And then you see price come down here and you see price violated. So, for me specifically, the reason I find so so much success with this entry is because you have that double confluence. And so, if you're ever indecisive in the market, even if you just want to use BPRs for bias, what you can more so look to do is look at something like this and be like, \"Okay, what what do we do off here? How will price react?\" And so, for me, if I were to see price come down after seeing the New York open trade so bearish, that simply looks like what? Continuation off what price was doing, just like last night, continuation off what price was doing, which was pumping. Today through New York, we dumped. We came back down here, we see price run through this low, and we see price violate this 1-minute BPR. As soon as we get confirmation which was a closure under, we met we then go short, I am short, and then 5 minutes after, what do you see? You see take profit smashed, a 1.1 R TP on this trade, a beautiful trade, and we cooked. Whole whole community cooked, done in front of 400-plus traders, and did very well. Very proud of them, and we killed it today at 2.9 R through Asia, 1.1 R through New York. If you're wondering what the target was here, like I said, it was the hourly FVG entry. Our stop was based off the swing high, giving the trade a bit or a bit of breathing room, and we see price come down here. However, price was still trash today. It was not good, but you can see how we're able to more so come out green and be versatile utilizing this idea because it helps with bias at minimum, and it could also be used as an asset for entries. So, that's pretty much that. With that being said, I'll wrap it up here. That's the review, that's how I use my entry models, and I'll catch you guys in the next one. Peace out.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/kOmp9b1ID2c" }, { "id": "glXzNtuS-hs", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$130,000 Day Trading LIVE (THE POWER OF PATIENCE)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glXzNtuS-hs", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 7, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 4.8, "shared_a_plus_score": 10.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 2211, "duration_seconds": 585, "chart_count": 14, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 83.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 125.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 167.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 208.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 250.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 292.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 334.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 376.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 417.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 459.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 501.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 543.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/glXzNtuS-hs/chart_14.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "glXzNtuS-hs", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$130,000 Day Trading LIVE (THE POWER OF PATIENCE)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glXzNtuS-hs", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 585, "view_count": 2211, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 10639, "transcript_path": "glXzNtuS-hs/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 83.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 125.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 167.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 208.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 250.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 292.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 334.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 376.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 417.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 459.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 501.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 543.2 } ], "chart_count": 14, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "take profit", "fair value gap", "liquidity", "sweep", "bias", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "making", "session", "futures", "nq", "es", "execution" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 4.8, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "invalidation", "fomo" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "fair value gap", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york", "invalidation" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:52 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm up over a $130,000 trading using this exact trade you see in front of you across all my prop accounts and my live accounts. A beautiful day where we stood patient and got rewarded. There was 2 days this week so far where I stood patient for hours on end and ended up not taking a trade. And today and Tuesday were 2 days where we stood patient, took a trade, and got rewarded up over a 5.5R on the week still holding this trade on my personal as we speak. Today, we'll be talking about my bias, my look, the entry model, and the execution aspect. So, a pretty awesome day today. If you go up here, you guys can kind of see the results on the look. Um essentially, what we were looking at for this trade was a 5-minute bearish BPR violation. So, we were looking for price to come up on these bearish gaps right here and violate them. But, before we get into that trade, let's get into my bias. Well, what was my bias for the morning? What was I thinking? Why did I think that we could trade higher? Well, if you look at higher time frame narratives on ES and NQ, starting off with the hourly, what we can see is that we had seen specifically NQ fulfill its 4-hour uh bullish BPR. So, we had a 4-hour bullish BPR, which instead of violating as we did through our entry model on the 5-minute time frame, we ended up holding. We do wick a bit under, but the 4-hour never closes, and we see price come back up, and we see price hold that 4-hour gap. On top of that, what was more significant was on ES, we swept our previous day low. So, today is Thursday, yesterday was Wednesday, and Wednesday's low was around here at 7515. And what we ended up doing through Thursday is sweeping that low. On top of that, we ended up also tapping this new week opening gap, which if you don't know, it's your Friday stock market close, futures market close, and your Sunday night open. That gap created over the weekend leaves a lot of in inefficiencies, a big imbalance in the market. We see price come down, and we see price fill that void by tapping deeper into this gap. We then see price overnight, which is important here. Not only do we put a significant low in, we also see price come back up, and we see price see a significant push back up into range. You see overnight price for the most part after creating that low and that new week opening gap. After seeing that sweep in PDL, we end up seeing price come back up, and we see price slowly trade higher. What we then see off the open through NQ specifically is we see a push into our opening range move, which if you guys don't know, that's something I use. It's where we typically have our New York open trade into the first area of liquidity, typically an overnight session higher low, and the reaction off that dictates and confirms the narrative through higher time frame. So, my narrative being bullish, oops, my narrative being bullish as I've shown through higher time frame just now, what I'm looking for this opening range move to do in order for me to be risk on immediately after the open or a little bit after the open, is I need to see a bullish opening range move. However, we do not end up getting that here. We end up seeing price come up here, sweep these overnight highs, our first area of liquidity where we met the high, then we had seen price come back down, and we see price follow through lower. ES off the open was actually a bit more bearish. It's funny cuz we took the long on ES, but ES is actually a bit more bearish off the open as it did not cause an opening range move. We end up seeing ES more so just come right back down. NQ pumped first and then came down. Um, but however, what we see a little bit later on is we see price essentially flip over and ES look a bit better for the upside trade. Now, Lento, what were you looking at here for specifically? At this point in time, I was not looking to be risk on because although my higher time frame bias was pointing bullish, the opening range move did not confirm upside interest yet. So, what I was looking for price to do, honestly, is essentially show me that it wanted to seek upside interest. So, the first things I had marked out was a 15-minute fair value gap, which was large in displacement. What I wanted to see price do was come down and retrace into that gap, tap it, and essentially trade higher. One of the first ideas that I had in mind was a 15-minute gap tap, and then we see price come back up. Oops, excuse me. We see price top of 15-minute gap, then we see price come back up, and we see price invert this 1-minute bearish um um fair value gap. That's what I wanted to see as a potential entry in the market. However, we did not offer that. We end up inverting the 15-minute gap, but looking at ES, which is what caused me to flip to ES, ES ends up filling the gap. We never invert the gap on ES. We simply fill, slightly wick under, and then come right back up. So, for me, recognizing that, oh, hold up, NQ inverted its 15-minute gap. However, ES did not. So, for me, looking at that, and then looking at the structure that we had developed off low, and then the type of displacement we got back up, I felt it was very fair to look at interest on ES for potential upside if we offered. So, so far, what we've identified is our higher time frame outlook was bullish through the lows that we put in. Overnight price was bullish, and we see higher time frames essentially come back up into range, telling you that price is also interested. Not only did we put in a good low, but price is interested in coming back up and trading higher. And then we see price on this ES 15-minute imbalance rebalance come back up. And so, for me at this point in time, interest sparked onto ES. On top of that, what's important here, which I want to go over, is you don't see me blindly enter a 15-minute gap fill. Although my higher time frame bias is bullish, and we're starting to see price turn around here, I'm not blatantly longing a 15-minute gap. What we also have here on top of this, kind of double confluence, is we have a 15-minute gap fill, and we have a 5-minute bearish BPR, which if you guys don't know what it is, it's a balanced price range. It's where you have a fair value gap and a inversion fair value gap in one zone. Typically on the review ZIC we trade or talk about, I usually have like a one one one type of gap entry. It's either an inversion fair value gap entry um where we look for, you know, an invert or we look for a fair value gap retest. For this, we looked for essentially a violation of this bearish BPR, the fair value gap and the inversion fair value gap. So, not only do we have this 15-minute gap fill here, but we also have two gaps where we're looking for price to mitigate. So, a lot of bullish confluence, a lot of bullish price needs to occur here in order for me to really long. We come up here and without much hesitation, little to no hesitation, we see price come up and we see price violate this BPR where you see a beautiful move back up. Menta, what was your stop placement? My stop placement on this trade was this wick low just below this road of low. You could have also done the road of low or road of low. That works as well. We end up coming up here and the confirmation sequence on this trade ends up being precisely at 9:51 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. You see me mention it here at 9:50 or excuse me, um Did I read that wrong? Um at 9:50 Yeah, there we go. At 9:52 um a.m. Eastern Standard Time is when we closed and right after we closed and gave confirmation, you see me alerted at 9:53. Beautifully with chat, we end up taking the trade. I said, \"Break even at London high.\" So, London high is here was our break even in mind. Our take profit one could have been London highs. I said though, you could hold for TP2, which would be Asia highs. That's what I held for personally. We end up seeing price essentially go up here and within 2 minutes we see a 34-point buy sequence. Obviously, this trade is news oriented to some extent, right? News helped propel. But honestly, if news never occurred here, I truly believe, right, conviction would have panned out. Had we What would we have seen um all-time highs? Sure. Maybe not, but I think Asia highs was a very high area of conviction, especially with our bias with identifying price and with our entry model precisely. So, a very good trade on the day. 1 and 0 mindset as we have in the room and you end up seeing a beautiful sequence where I end up capping my TPT make over $50,000 on there alone. And then you also end up seeing me show my calendar on Lucid, which in total I've made around $130,000 trading today across all my props, which would be TPT, it would be Topstep, it would be Lucid, and it would be Tradovate. And on top of that, I have my two personal live accounts, which I trade as well. So, great day overall and we catch a beautiful trade. We're still holding as we're talking about this right now. But a beautiful day overall where we had a very good trade. Again, the important thing I want you guys to recognize here on top of that, two things. One, how patient we were. Just because we had a bullish bias, we did not FOMO into a trade. We waited for a good precise entry in the market. Opening range move typically gives you good timing in the market if you have like a narrative via higher time frame and the opening range you know, move confirms direction, um, you can more so look to, um, you know, trade it then. We did not end up doing that here. However, we had a 50-minute gap rebounds and we had the VPR violation. We had such a bullish beautiful confluence here and then we end up taking risk and putting risk on. I felt a good invalidation point was around this route of low. Had we seen price, you know, come up here and then come back down under this route of low, it's fair to assume that price would trade lower at least into overnight lows. So, good stop point. We end up seeing price go here in a beautiful trade like I said overall as we consistently have been creating new highs, back to all-time highs and our next TP level right now is $7,600 or 7,600 um, on ES specifically. So, that's pretty much that. A beautiful day. With that being said, hopefully you guys enjoyed it. Hopefully you guys like this review. We're back on live stream tomorrow morning 9:30 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. And if you want to watch a video on the opening range move precisely. Literally click on my YouTube channel and scroll down a bit and you'll literally see that video. So, hope you guys enjoyed it. I'm going to catch you guys in the next one. Peace out.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/glXzNtuS-hs" }, { "id": "B0zo-B9HQDA", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +90,000 Day Trading Live (NO Bullsh*t Guide)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0zo-B9HQDA", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 8, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 4.8, "shared_a_plus_score": 10.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 2110, "duration_seconds": 979, "chart_count": 20, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 49.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 97.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 146.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 195.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 244.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 293.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 342.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 391.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 440.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 489.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 538.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 587.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 636.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_14.png" }, { "file": "chart_15.png", "t_sec": 685.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_15.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_15.png" }, { "file": "chart_16.png", "t_sec": 734.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_16.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_16.png" }, { "file": "chart_17.png", "t_sec": 783.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_17.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_17.png" }, { "file": "chart_18.png", "t_sec": 832.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_18.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_18.png" }, { "file": "chart_19.png", "t_sec": 881.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_19.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_19.png" }, { "file": "chart_20.png", "t_sec": 930.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_20.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/B0zo-B9HQDA/chart_20.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "B0zo-B9HQDA", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +90,000 Day Trading Live (NO Bullsh*t Guide)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0zo-B9HQDA", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 979, "view_count": 2110, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 18922, "transcript_path": "B0zo-B9HQDA/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 49.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 97.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 146.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 195.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 244.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 293.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 342.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 391.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 440.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 489.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 538.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 587.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 636.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_15.png", "t_sec": 685.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_16.png", "t_sec": 734.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_17.png", "t_sec": 783.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_18.png", "t_sec": 832.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_19.png", "t_sec": 881.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_20.png", "t_sec": 930.2 } ], "chart_count": 20, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "short", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "take profit", "fair value gap", "fvg", "liquidity", "bias", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "loss", "making", "scalp", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 4.8, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "drawdown", "stop loss" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "fair value gap", "fvg", "bias", "confirmation", "london", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:40 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm up over $90,000 day-trading live, and here's the exact trade that helped me make over $90,000. But before we get into this trade, I was actually red yesterday, and yesterday I lost over $61,000 day-trading. Well, how the hell did I come in today unfazed? How did I continue to follow my system? How did I not, you know, psychologically have a lapse and you know, continue on forwards with my system? Well, we'll get into it. Before we get into today and how I made $90,000 precisely, let's get into yesterday and how I lost $61,000. So, coming into yesterday, simply put, I had a long bias. With sentiment through our higher time frame and how price was looking, it was very easy for me to believe that price was going to draw higher coming into yesterday's open. The thing with yesterday specifically is I didn't have a direct bias outlook in terms of a mechanical sense. I simply was going off what trend was doing in the market, which you could see on the hourly time frame, the 4-hour, or the daily, were clearly bullish, by engulfing consistently and seeing large directional movement towards the upside. I I leaned on that. Now, the thing with yesterday specifically, right off the bat, immediately after I shut off my live with the red day that I had, one of the first thing was the what was was the bias outlook I kind of had a that was a bit better, right? So, if you're looking at price here specifically, although we were very bullish, I don't think it was the wrong thing to be bullish here or, you know, specifically with bias, it's a lot more so with timing on my red days. For example, for yesterday specifically, coming into the open with that bullish sentiment through higher time frame and just naturally leading on that, although we didn't have a pure mechanical look on exactly why we're bullish, you guys have to remember, including myself, and yesterday was a good reminder, that timing is very important for us scalpers. You could have the right bias, but if your timing's not there, you will still get stopped out. We could be trading at literal all-time highs, and you could still get stopped out on longs if you don't have the right timing for your trades. And so, for me specifically yesterday coming into the open, although bright price was clearly bullish, what I wanted to more so do and should have done was been a bit more patient. We had a bullish look higher time frame. Again, no mechanical look not no perfect low being put in place. We see price overnight not really do much more so in a state of consolidation and coming into the New York open, we have our bullish opening range move which where we see price come up here take out overnight highs and you theoretically see price still hold above the highs and showcase interest in driving higher. From there, what we ended up looking for for trade number one, which was trade number one out of two, was we looked for a one-minute inversion fair value gap rebalance. Now, here's the thing. Although this trade took an out although we lost money yesterday, this first trade here was easily voidable in terms of taking a loss. What I mean by that specifically is had we taken the initial inversion entry, we most likely would have been in a lot better of a position. Now, what we end up doing here through yesterday's we end up taking the retest. So, we initially invert the gap which would have been your initial confirmation right here. And then you see price essentially come back up. Then we end up seeing price come back down, rebalance, tap the CE, the midpoint of the one-minute bullish inversion fair value gap, and you see price come back up here which we then then we eventually take confirmation at this one-minute closure at 9:57 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. Now, that confirmation part is not the most worrisome thing, although it could have been better. It was more so me not being more so risk on or me being proactive a lot sooner in the market. Today we were. Today we were very patient but still very alert. Yesterday we were not. We took a retest inversion fair value gap which we often rarely ever do, right? We always typically take the inversion creation, that confirmation right here, um through our entry models versus the retest. So, that was kind of the first indication that okay, yeah, I'm I'm a bit off today. But more so specifically with confirmation going back to that, this was not the best confirmation to work off. I will say trade number two had even worse confirmation, but with this trade here, its confirmation it wasn't the worst in the world, but what you want to see ideally as we always talk about when it comes to confirmation on trades, is you want to see price rebalance, and you want to see price engulf past. We do see a good candle, but this is not an engulfing sequence where you see price come down deeply, and then you see price showcase a really good instance. We have that instance more so a couple days ago or constantly, but not with yesterday's first trade. We end up having our stop placement based off this one that went low. Uh but it's a model or excuse me, one minute fair value gap blow, it's a model stop loss, right? And we end up seeing price essentially come back up. We initially go in the money right after entry, but ultimately come back down, and we see price draw down lower. Now, Lento, what could you have done better here? What what what is something you could have worked on that could have improved you avoiding this entry or potentially, you know, uh waiting later on for a potential entry uh moving forward or even just avoiding it entirely. Well, for Reese specifically, although we had a higher time frame look, what I needed to do yesterday was have a complete mechanical look. Like I said earlier on, you can have a bullish bias, which I still think wasn't the worst thing to have here, but if you have no typical or systematical or mechanical uh look from your higher time frame aside from the fact that we're seeing price trend in one direction, there's not really going to be a precise timing aspect to your trading. So again, on the hourly time frame, it's not like we created a significant move or we saw a large imbalance or we saw something of significance or of significance. We see price essentially just trade up, and all we're looking to do is simply ride that trend further on. That was more so me blindly sticking to a bias due to the trend in the market. With our second trade in the market, it was a trade in which we ended up taking on ES. If you go to ES here, and you see ES, this trade entry was a bit after our first entry on NQ. So we took this as a trade entry on NQ at around 9:57, got stopped out a couple minutes later at 10:02. Our second trade on ES here was taken around 10:15, so about 7 minutes or so after trade entry on the first take or after stop out in the first trade, we end up seeing price offer something for us theoretically and we end up taking a second trade. Now, this trade here I'm very upset about. This is the only trade this week where I'm truthfully disappointed. The we've only had I think two losses this week, try to find right. The first trade yesterday and the second trade yesterday. The first trade I'm not going to be too upset about cuz it's not the worst thing in the world. We could have been a better with our timing through again our higher time frame look and if we had like a feasible or feasible actual entry criteria and and components to our system, we could have taken that. This right here specifically pisses me off looking back at it afterwards because we were a very choppy here coming into this trade. And not only that, I take a very bad entry model off this trade. What I end up doing is instead of looking for a proper entry in the market, I simply look at this. Well, I'm going to gap here, which was a bullish fair value gap, which it then got turned into a bearish inversion gap, which we then came back up and violated after. Now, I will say this, the gap's not the worst here in terms of taking because we had this instance before and we've seen it work out really well where we've seen a bullish gap come down here, close under, violate it, and then still come back up and take that trade. More so, what upset me here was the price action sequence and the confirmation sequence on this trade. We had stop loss based off the road of low. We wanted to go break even off the highs and then target a psychological level in 20 or 782 or 78 30 on ES. The thing that I'm upset about here going again is the fact that price was very choppy coming into the open. As you guys know, price action and confirmation, specifically confirmation itself, is the timing aspect of our trade. Right? As we talked about with the first trade, our timing was off through our bias. With this trade, our timing was off off the easiest thing, confirmation. Price did not confirm here well. We You price steadily over and over again stutter inside the gap, where we eventually see a couple closures over the gap, but you never see an enticing engulfing sequence. Right, a proper engulfing sequence off an entry, you go back a couple days ago, or go back to the last recap, and you can literally see what good confirmation is. You want to see price tap a gap off a rebalance, or in the case that we invert, you want to see price come up, invert with an engulfing sequence. You want to see price be consistent on the move up. This is not consistent. This was up, down, up, down, up, down. When in the history of the stock market have you ever seen price go to draw when you see price trade up, down, up, down, up, down and this is it's The reason we use confirmation is for timing. And when confirmation's clear, timing's clear. Confirmation was not clear, therefore not making this timing clear. We were actually going to get stopped out. This is more so pattern trade than it is anything else, truthfully. The first trade wasn't too, too bad. This trade right here was very bad. It's a rookie mistake from my end, truthfully, and this is a rookie uh take, right? Because all we essentially end up seeing here was, \"Oh, we got stopped out first trade. Our long bias is still there. Oh, one minute gap here. We see price come back up. Let's take the trade.\" Um I said, you know, of recently, previous recaps, and for today specifically, we had clear draw and clear bias. Let's move on to today, and let's talk about why today was successful as opposed to yesterday. Well, coming into today, first things first, our bias. The reason today was so successful coming into um our day was because of our higher time frame bias. As referenced earlier, what we talked about with our day yesterday was that we had no definitive lower high or extensive move put in place higher time frame to allow us to be bullish and allow us to be bullish now. So, with today coming into the open, what we end up seeing price do coming into the New York open was we ended up seeing price fulfill an hourly gap. We had an hourly gap fill here at 29238, and our low was put in ticks away from that 29238 hourly gap fill. We see a beautiful rebounds on the hourly time frame, paired up with the 4-hour time frame bit rebalancing on here. And on top of that, you have a clear displacive move off the low into our opening range move. So, we see a really go really good low being put in place through the hourly gap fill and the 4-hour gap tap. And not only that, as we talk about with our two components in reversals in the market, you see price putting in a low, but then you also see price displace clearly. What do we lack of yesterday coming into the open with our bias is that displacement. You see price open up through New York here on ES. And what do you see price do? This is your 9:30 open. We do nothing but trade in range, right? Now that 9:30 open, ever since that, we did not end up seeing price come back down and or come back down or up past this range until after 10:38 10:37 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. So, about an hour and 7 minutes or so after our open, we eventually see our first move. Well, with today, we end up seeing our first move right off the open. We see price come up here, and we see price end up putting in a low and displacing all the way back up seeking a move higher in the market. Now, initially coming into the market, I had a short bias. I wanted to see price trade lower. But after you see the displacement that we got off the open and the low that we put in, it was very clear to have your bullish sentiment um put in place. Idea, potential long in play. Break even off of London highs, target Asia highs. 1-minute FVG rebalance combining two similar gaps into one. So, as we talked about, three components: bias, price action, and our true model. You could see with today's bias clearly off the higher time frame look and your opening range move paired up with price action be very displacive and very directional. We had a clear look. So, not only do we have a clear look in bias in terms of being bullish here, but we had a clear look in price action which happened a or which helped a lot more with timing, right? And you could see that happened today. We end up seeing price come up, and with our entry model here specifically after getting our three components with our two components lining up the third. First component being bias, second component component being price action. And after those two components were A plus, we simply looked to for a good entry model in continuation here riding higher. Again, hourly low putting place based off the fact that we saw an hourly gap fulfilled, a 4-hour gap tapped into. We see beautiful displacement right back up. And all we simply look to do now is ride a continuation take after the reversal already happened into set draw targets. Another thing that we lacked yesterday, unlike lacking today, is yesterday we lacked clear draw targets. Specifically with the ES take, we end up seeing a trade entry where we had to use simply purely off psychological levels, no definitive um inefficiencies in the market, unlike NQ here for today where we see a clear London high and a clear Asia high. So, what we do today is we take this trade before liquidity was ran. We take a beautiful optimal entry where we combine two 1-minute gaps. What's a why combine two 1-minute gaps? Well, I wanted to create a bigger displace of area of interest where we could see price draw into. This 1-minute gap here was too small for my liking. This two 1-minute gap was too too small for my liking. So, I combined the both and I looked for a potential entry model there. I kept the stop placement, unlike yesterday being the model stop, I kept today's stop placement off the 1-minute wick low, had our take profit interest in these Asia high, and our break-even zone once we saw a closure above high of uh above London highs. We eventually take our long here and I say I'm long at 9:55 9:59 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. We eventually go break-even once we saw price initially consolidate off entry. Then, we see price eventually come back up here. And after a bit of consolidation, we see price eventually go, \"Lento, why the did we chop so much today? Lento, I took your trade today on the live, but why do we chop so much? Why did we always or why did we almost get stopped out?\" Well, here was the main thing. The SMT divergence. I made a short about this earlier today as well, but the SMT divergence today that we had in the market, this was caused this consolidation in this trade. We went We went from, you know, taking this trade to a bit of drawdown to seeing price points away from TP, to coming back down here and seeing price points away from break even, to eventually coming back up here and taking out highs. Well, here's a great way to tell. You guys know SMT divergence is a big factor when it comes to my trading, and this is a set piece to this edge right here. Like so, how are you able to tell? Well, if you look at slightly after our entry, what we end up doing here, the way you're able to tell, two good two main ways. You tell through price and in terms of how price delivers, through just the engulfing sequences that we have, or you tell based off highs and lows. Well, if you compare ES's or ES and NQ's London high together, what you could tell is that we end up seeing NQ come up here, and we end up seeing NQ take out its London high at 10:07 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. Remember that real quick, because if you look at ES, and you look at when ES took out its London high, ES does not end up taking out its London high all the way until 10:11 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. So, what does that tell you? NQ ended up taking out its London high 4 minutes before ES ended up taking out its high. So, what does that tell you? That tells you that NQ is the index in which wants in one or in which wants to trade higher sooner than the other index, which tells you this index is leading. So, we end up doing that. We While we end up holding this trade, we have a good realization of that, and we also have more conviction in this trade panning out. But, the reason you see this trade consolidate so much prior to take profit, more so is because NQ was trying to push and push and push, but ES clearly, once we took out that high at London high, you could see that although NQ was pushing up, ES was coming back down. So, this instance right here at 10:19 to 10:28, if you pair that up with NQ, you could see that from 10:19 to 10:28, we saw price come down, and we saw price come down at a discount or a smaller rate compared to ES because NQ was still leading through our identification. ES though was looking for a reversal, and we had no one end up seeing take profit get hit until ES showcases a relief in the market. So, you can see the sequence right here that ended up happening at 10:53 all the way until 11:10, about 20 minutes or so until our take profit gets hit. You can see in the same stretch, price on ES wasn't even moving towards the upside at all. All we saw was a bit of consolidation and a bit of a relief back up. And this simple move right here, right, is what caused NQ to come up and take profit. Being that we had recognized how bullish NQ was relative to ES, we knew we were in good hands, but we knew there was a risk factor in us getting stopped out break even in the case that ES wanted to see lower. Good thing is, NQ was so bullish to the point where it would still hit TP regardless of ES being the weaker asset, but I can promise you guys in chat, if ES was ever ever bullish at any point today after our entry, not only would this trade been at TP one trade on NQ, but this trade would have hit multiple take profits at once. So, that's pretty much that, and that's the review. Hopefully you guys enjoyed it. With you With that being said, I'm going to catch you guys in the next one. Peace out.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/B0zo-B9HQDA" }, { "id": "RFg6FNFceJw", "content_type": "video", "title": "How I Genuinely Made +$165,168.64 Today. (No Bullsh*t)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFg6FNFceJw", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 9, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 4.8, "shared_a_plus_score": 10.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1942, "duration_seconds": 574, "chart_count": 14, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 81.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 122.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 163.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 204.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 245.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 286.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 327.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 368.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 409.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 450.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 491.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 532.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/RFg6FNFceJw/chart_14.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "RFg6FNFceJw", "content_type": "video", "title": "How I Genuinely Made +$165,168.64 Today. (No Bullsh*t)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFg6FNFceJw", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 574, "view_count": 1942, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 11183, "transcript_path": "RFg6FNFceJw/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 81.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 122.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 163.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 204.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 245.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 286.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 327.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 368.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 409.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 450.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 491.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 532.7 } ], "chart_count": 14, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "short", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "take profit", "fair value gap", "liquidity", "bias", "setup", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "loss", "session", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 4.8, "keyword_hits": [ "drawdown", "stop loss", "invalidation" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "fair value gap", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "invalidation" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:53 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm up over $165,000 on the trading day trading prop firms in my two live accounts. In today's review, I'll be talking about exactly what I took at the trade right in front of your eyes. Let's get right into it. So, clearly a very productive day in the market. The beautiful thing is I do this live every single freaking day and we ended up capitalizing this on live. Um and let's get the breakdown. So, first things first, let's all What the hell were you thinking this morning? What was your bias? Well, easy. First things first, we start off the higher time frame. Obviously looking at higher time frame through your daily, through your 4-hour. Starting from the daily, you can see how bullish we are. We're consistently creating new engulfing sequences towards the upside. Every time that we've had a sell sequence in the market, we've always seen price come right back up in the past month and month or two. Um in terms of my bias for the morning, specifically intraday, what I was looking for was I was looking on the hourly and 4-hour. The first thing I had realized was that the 4-hour created a gap and we also tapped into it. So, this 4-hour gap right here on Sunday the 24th created around 6:00 p.m. was a gap that the price clearly came back down and tapped into through yesterday's session and last night's overnight session. So, for me specifically, looking at this 4-hour time frame, I was like, \"Okay, price being as bullish as it's been with engulfing sequences creating higher lows consistently and new highs consistently, new all-time highs consistently, if we see this 4-hour gap get respected via the opening range move.\" So, you see this 4-hour gap here and this 4-hour candle gap reaction. If we see that 4-hour zone, which is around here, get respected and we see price off the open trade bullish through our opening range move, which is the first area into liquidity, you know, that would be the ultimate indication that price most likely would like to draw higher. So, you have a combination of your 4-hour time frame higher time frame bias. This 4-hour gap being put into that low that was put in is this low right here specifically. And all we had to do through the open is for the opening range move, if we came up here, took out a high, and showcased bullish indication past that high, it's clear as that clear as day as that low put in is the low that's most likely going to stay, and that we were most likely going to trade higher. So, with that being said, we had a couple ideas today. We had one idea and one alert specifically. If we kind of go over the trade, um this is the first piece I kind of posted. Potential 5-minute IFG long in place. This 5-minute IFG That's the why I take this. First things first, in terms of the framework of the setup, it was a 5-minute fair value gap invert. The stop loss was planned based off of model stop, which if you guys don't know what a model stop is, it's basically where we go stop loss based off the fair value gap candle low or open, depending on, you know, if it's a long, it's the low. If it's a short, it's the high of the candle. And so, that's kind of what we did here. A great invalidation point. I felt as if if price were to invert this 5-minute gap and then come back down and trade below this point, I thought we most definitely would have seen price come back down and trade to this low and potentially this low, mitigating extra loss. So, we see price come up here, and the idea was a 5-minute gap go invert. Well, we also had bullish SMT off of lows. It was pretty extreme, but you see off the open here essentially NQ creating a higher low off that London low. It was a supreme higher low. We weren't even close to coming down here and taking that low. But however, if you look at ES, you see ES actually take out that low. So, you see clear bullish SMT as ES created a lower low past this London low. It wasn't too much, right? It wasn't much lower, but it's still a low that we see price get taken out off on ES, but however, on NQ clearly ends up creating a higher low. So, for me looking at that, looking at the indices or indices that took or created a higher low, I'm now looking interested in potentially taking longs off the indices, which creates that higher low, which is NQ here in this occasion. So, with our higher time frame bias being that 4-hour gap tap, and with our opening range move want and want to see price trade past this line and high here, what we essentially are looking for now is a clear indication of reversal back up higher. So, you see the bullish SMT currents, higher time frame sits you know, sits in play or fits in play, and then you also see NQ lead ES. What we simply looked for here was a simple entry model. Good alignment with every component, right? Bias, price action, and entry model. So, entry model always comes last. It's the third component, and we ended up ended up taking this 5-minute gap idea where we see a 5-minute bullish gap go invert. Remember, we took on NQ because of the fact that NQ was the stronger asset proven by the divergence occurred, and also the engulfing sequence that we got backed up. If you look at the 5-minute sequence that we got on ES compared to NQ, NQ ends up inverting its 1:09:30 a.m. 5-minute gap before ES does because ES ends up ends up inverting its 5-minute gap all the way up at 9:45 a.m. NQ ends up inverting it at 9:40. So, 5-minute candle before you see it go invert. In terms of confirmation on this trade, your model fill was taken at 9:41 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. Unfortunately for me, I kind of read this a bit late, not late enough to like miss it, but I didn't have all my trading applications open. So, what I actually ended up doing was mentioning confirmation has given personally looking to wait for a retest for the potential retest to potentially enter. So, what I was looking for more so being that I missed my entry, was waiting for potential retest if it offered. Obviously being that we were so bullish with the setup, it did not. People in chat did end up taking the trade and did a good job of doing that, which I'm very proud of you guys in chat who are watching this review right now, um who took that trade on your own because it was a good setup, great setup. Uh but yeah, for me, I personally missed out on this. So, we ended up seeing price come up here, take out Asia highs, seek a retracement, and then we have our second trade of the day, which is the trade I end up taking personally, and it was a 1-minute bearish BPR invalidation entry. Well, what does that mean? If you guys don't know, a bearish BPR is where you have two bearish imbalances in one zone. So, you right here, you have a gap, and right here, you have a gap. This is what you would call a bearish fair value gap, and this is what you would call a or a bearish inversion fair value gap. What I'm looking for price to do is I'm looking for price to come back up here, and I'm looking for price to invert and violate both these gaps. Right? The idea is Usually, you guys take an inversion entry, a fair value gap entry, those are one imbalance, right? That you're taking an inversion entry, a violated, you know, say bearish gap for a long or a violated bullish gap for a short off one imbalance violation. We're looking at two here. We see two, we end up seeing price come back up. The ideology behind this trade, we did not end up using model stop off this trade because I felt we didn't have enough displacement. It wasn't the best invalidation point. The best invalidation point for this trade, in my eyes, was these What was this throw out of low? We see price come back up, and we see price it confirm this trade specifically at 9:55 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. We then see price push up. The only unfortunate thing when it comes to trading to all-time highs is that we had to use psychological levels. So, that was kind of the ideology here, right? Potential re-entry if you could trade back above Asia highs with pace, I expect higher. Only annoying aspect trading all-time highs is above it, you can only use psych levels. No historical data. Target 30,050, break even there. So, you can see I clearly mention, \"Okay, this is what I'm looking for. This is what I want to see. This is exactly the target I have in mind for our take profit.\" And you end up seeing me mention, \"I am long. A beautiful take.\" And we end up smashing take profit about 15 minutes later or so um on a beautiful trade. It was snow and slow initially, but eventually, we end up seeing price pick up. We break through the 30,000s, and we see a beautiful push. Again, just extending on that bullish bias we had in the morning. I will say, however, if we came up here, and out Asia highs or took out all-time highs, specifically Asia for this sequence here, and we saw a reversal back down lower, I most likely would have been cashed the whole day. I only pertain interest in upside because of the fact that we had all-time highs sitting here, and every time we've seen price trade opens off the all-time highs, um we typically tend to usually create new ones in the past month and a half. So, we're kind of just relying off that alongside the opening range move here. So, we played that. For me today this morning at least, it was either I play upside or I don't play anything because the markets were telling me and giving me indication of upside interest. If the markets did not showcase that, I would have not taken a trade. So, that was that. We ended up seeing price come up here and smash take profit two. I ended up capping out on my accounts, and then clearly as I showed at the beginning of the video, up around $165,000. This is my personal trade of an account, personal trade of an account, prop firm, prop firm, prop firm, prop firm. So, cooked on all. If you guys are wondering why I'm up only this much on Lucid and Trade, Lucid and Tradeify, um it's because of the fact that I'm on cycle two of these account payouts, right? So, I only need $4,500 per account made before my next payout, which you know, if you trade straight or trade straight to funded accounts or lightning funded accounts, you know, 20% consistency, 20% of um 4,500 is 900 bucks, which makes the math there. Um so, yeah, that's pretty much that. That's the day. A beautiful day overall, executed well, and a great way to start off our week, right? I traded yesterday. I'll show you guys briefly. I was on yesterday morning, but there was nothing there. I kept providing insight, but there was nothing for us to take. There was one setup I liked, but it never presented as a result showcased interest in higher. So, we simply stood cash. And for most traders, what they would do is yesterday they would go, force a trade, put themselves in drawdown, and then come back today, still be emotional, and not trade properly. We did not take a trade yesterday, although we were on the charts for a couple hours. We came in today, and we simply executed, and now we're green on the week, right? And pretty nice as well. So, um with that being said, that's the review. Hopefully you guys enjoyed it, and I'll catch you guys in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/RFg6FNFceJw" }, { "id": "U_DmOfrsltY", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$21,000 Live Trading (With a 50% WR!)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_DmOfrsltY", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 10, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 6.4, "shared_a_plus_score": 10.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1903, "duration_seconds": 499, "chart_count": 12, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 83.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 124.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 166.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 207.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 249.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 291.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 332.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 374.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 415.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 457.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/U_DmOfrsltY/chart_12.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "U_DmOfrsltY", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$21,000 Live Trading (With a 50% WR!)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_DmOfrsltY", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 499, "view_count": 1903, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 9564, "transcript_path": "U_DmOfrsltY/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 83.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 124.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 166.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 207.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 249.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 291.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 332.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 374.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 415.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 457.5 } ], "chart_count": 12, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "orm", "short", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "take profit", "fair value gap", "sweep", "bias", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "profit", "loss", "making", "losing", "session", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 6.4, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "drawdown", "stop loss", "invalidation" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "fair value gap", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york", "invalidation", "invalidate" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:39 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm up over $20,000 daytrading live with a 50% win rate. I took two trades today, one loser, one winner, and I ended up making $21,000. If you're curious in the two trades I took today, here they are. They were a short which stopped out and a long. But before we directly talk about the trades, let's briefly talk about my bias. Why did I take the trades where I did today and where was my thought process behind everything? So, coming into the open, I had a pretty decisive look on what I wanted to see. For me specifically, I wanted to see lower. The reason being that we ended up seeing higher time frame really print down lower. After seeing a consolidated New York session yesterday, we ended up seeing overnight be quite productive. We ended up seeing a really good sell through the overnight range, which for me specifically entailed that price was very bearish. For me, specifically for me, it's very hard to go against bias or to go against, you know, market sentiment when it's as strong as it's been here. With New York yesterday primarily, I feel like having your bullish or bearish bias, it really didn't matter too too much because there was no clear sentiment in the market. With today, it was pretty obvious that the type of sell that we ended up seeing today through the market. And so for me, it was very hard to go against this, especially with the type of open that we had. I felt, you know, we we didn't end up installing a tremendous low. We ended up seeing price come down here on ES and NQ and sweeping a significant low being the London low. But again, it wasn't significant to the point where it was a higher time frame look. Kind of disregarded it, and for me specifically, I had that bearish bias again, expecting kind of a retracement here followed by a further sell lower. Just like we've had here multiple times through the overnight sequence. You see price retrace, then ultimately come down, retrace, then ultimately come back down. That was my expectation here through the open being how bearish the overnight range was, and being how clear we had a set area of draw being this hourly internal wick low on ES on NQ, and this 4-hour FEG entry and daily gap, which would be right right here at 7625. Now, first trade I ended taking after recognizing my bias was bearish due to the overnight range, due to the higher time frame look being bearish and validating consecutive arrays, I wanted to see lower. Initially, we saw the sweep of the low. We would have seen price come up here or come down here, then come up. But ultimately for me, I wanted to see lower in price, and ultimately, that's what we ended up seeing price come down initially and do. We ended up looking at this 1-minute gap go to go short off of requiring a bit more displacement for extra confirmation, and that price had interest in driving back down lower. We eventually come down here, quite potentially essentially get bottom ticked off our entry, but we then see price consolidate and ultimately come back up here and stop us out. The ideology behind this trade is we take short off this 1-minute gap go invert as we see price come down here on low of day for the potential interest of reversal off that low. We go break even, we go risk free. That way, we have no potential of losing money. From there, our take profit interest one would have been this hourly internal wick low as we said it was a higher time frame draw for ES. If we take it on there, it would have been this 4-hour fair value gap entry long side daily gap. But again, as we take entry, we end up seeing price immediately come right back up, where we eventually end up seeing price stop us out on this trade. Stop placement was a valid of highs. Felt it was a great invalidation point, and which what it it was because you see price come up here, stop us out, and ultimately trade much higher after. Now, at this point, sitting at a minus one R, a lot of traders nowadays, especially who are newer, could really get emotionally involved and get get really upset about what happened here and be like, \"Damn, I'm red. I really want to follow a trade.\" What you'll then see them do is you'll see them break the rules, gamble trade, might get lucky, but then start implementing that as a process they do over and over again. For me specifically, I sat out. I stood, you know, normal to my system. I didn't break any of my rules. I realized, \"Okay, we took a stop out, saw an invalidation off this trade, simply move on to the next one.\" And after seeing price sweep these lows and seeing price come back up, you did not see me marry a bias. More so than anything else, you see me look to actually look for a turnaround. In my Discord, after the initial first trade I ended taking, you see me kind of mention the ideology behind flipping narrative. You see me after the initial trade, where is it? Right here. I mentioned a short you mentioned me go short. After we stop out, I say, \"Higher is the clear look now.\" Invalidated take we had. The only issue is we didn't install a great low. ES didn't away with a hard bio. So, you see me not blindly continuously marry my bias, but more so adjust and recognize that price was more bullish here. How did we recognize that? Well, one, again, we swept overnight lows, not too significant, but we see a sweep of a low. Then, we see price start to install higher lows and see good displacement further on. From there on out, you then also see price eventually come up here and you see price invalidate and violate a 1-hour bearish gap. So, for me specifically, you see this hourly gap getting violated alongside the low that we had put in place with the sweep. And then, the displacement that we got, it was clear as day, \"Okay, price does look pretty bullish here.\" So, eventually, you see me end up coming up here and looking for the ideal entry point where we ended up going long off this 1-minute gap go in for. We ended up seeing price come up here, which I took an initial long here, which was a break-even long, so not much to really go over. But, you eventually end up seeing me wait for the retracement back inside the hourly gap, which you see me mark out here. We see a perfect rebalance off that hourly gap, and we end up seeing price essentially come back up and providing an entry. And similar to our trade number one, what we always look for is we look for displacement. So, very similar components on this trade to the first one, except we flipped narrative and we had a lot more conviction. Trade number one was more so off the look of overnight price. The opening range move wasn't technically bearish, right? Because we ended up seeing price sweep the low, but for me specifically, I was trying to anticipate it. Instead of anticipating this time, we more so looked to react, and we saw reaction off that hourly gap fill. We then see price come back up, and ultimately providing our long entry off this 4-minute gap go invert. Here was our entry. We ended up seeing price be dominant off the entry confirmation. We then eventually take the trade with our stops being break even near this 4-minute gap 4-minute PPR uh violation and fill. We ended up seeing price come up here, and instantly right after taking the trade, what do you imagine with all the consequences that we had? With the hourly gap rebound, with the lows installed off the sweep of London lows, with the price displacer that we got clearly showing bullish, what do we see? We see price validation. And not only do we see validation on this trade, but we take this trade, and we're pretty much in zero drawdown the entire trade. We see price come right back up, and we see price immediately go into set take profits. You see me alert this obviously on my Discord. We ended up taking the trade and going long. Again, ideology here was a similar concept through the entry model of the last trade. It was an inversion sequence with proper displacement met prior, but this time around, the reason you see success on this is because you have consistent data through New York telling you that price wants to trade higher, and then you also see a low installed off the retracement here, which was a good low off this hourly fill. This right here, this high that we ended up installing before coming back down was not that good of a high put in place. So, the displacement that we got down wasn't as significant because again, we didn't put in a significant high. We put in a significant low here. We eventually ended up coming here. Our stop loss on this trade here, the invalidation point, was the relative low, the low that we ended up putting off the hourly gap fill. And then we see price beautifully come up here, and we see a very nice move up higher where we eventually come come back up here and confirm into take profit being 29 311. This trade ends up panning out to be about a 1.8 R trade meaning our first trade was a minus 1R, our second trade was a plus 1.8R leaving our trading day at around a 0.8R in the positive. That's why you don't see me be be up too too much, but you see how our risk system or how our system in general really really clutched up for us today and we did a really good job. So beautiful session overall, a great review in a simple day simple simply put where we sat down, stood patient, and we were able to do this and achieve this within the span of about 2 hours or so. Now relaxing on the day and we simply move on. With that being said, that's the review. Hopefully you guys enjoyed that one. Catch you guys in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/U_DmOfrsltY" }, { "id": "W_g_aBoJyFo", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making $200,000+ LIVE TRADING! (Q&A)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_g_aBoJyFo", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 11, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 10.0, "shared_a_plus_score": 10.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1853, "duration_seconds": 2857, "chart_count": 20, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 142.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 285.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 428.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 571.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 714.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 857.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 1000.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 1142.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 1285.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 1428.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 1571.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 1714.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 1857.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_14.png" }, { "file": "chart_15.png", "t_sec": 2000.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_15.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_15.png" }, { "file": "chart_16.png", "t_sec": 2142.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_16.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_16.png" }, { "file": "chart_17.png", "t_sec": 2285.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_17.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_17.png" }, { "file": "chart_18.png", "t_sec": 2428.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_18.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_18.png" }, { "file": "chart_19.png", "t_sec": 2571.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_19.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_19.png" }, { "file": "chart_20.png", "t_sec": 2714.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_20.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/W_g_aBoJyFo/chart_20.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "W_g_aBoJyFo", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making $200,000+ LIVE TRADING! (Q&A)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_g_aBoJyFo", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 2857, "view_count": 1853, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 51050, "transcript_path": "W_g_aBoJyFo/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 142.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 285.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 428.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 571.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 714.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 857.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 1000.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 1142.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 1285.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 1428.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 1571.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 1714.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 1857.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_15.png", "t_sec": 2000.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_16.png", "t_sec": 2142.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_17.png", "t_sec": 2285.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_18.png", "t_sec": 2428.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_19.png", "t_sec": 2571.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_20.png", "t_sec": 2714.3 } ], "chart_count": 20, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "orm", "short", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "take profit", "fair value gap", "liquidity", "sweep", "bias", "setup", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trade", "pnl", "p&l", "profit", "loss", "making", "losing", "session", "futures", "nq", "es", "spy", "qqq" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "risk management", "drawdown", "stop loss", "revenge", "size down", "contracts" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "fair value gap", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:55 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "All right. All right. So, all right. Oops, let me do this again. All right, y'all. Welcome back to a brand new review. Shout out to you guys for rocking in here. I know it's a Sunday evening. A lot of you guys typically are you know, taking today off and just relaxing. So, shout out to y'all in here putting in the extra work. It means a lot, right? For yourself as a trader. Putting in the extra time is what's key in order to really get yourself to where you need to be, if that makes sense. And yeah, I mean the 100 guys you 100 people in you Excuse me. The 100 of you guys in here. That's what it takes, you know. It takes constant effort. You guys know, for anyone in here who's ever succeeded, say you know, any other facets of their life at all, you know how much work it takes in order to get to somewhere you want to be. It's the same same thing with this. Effort is what matters and most importantly smart work is what matters as well, right? You could work hard, but the thing with trading that's that trumps all every other kind of industry is that it takes smart work as well. You can't just come in put in a you know, certain amount of hours and expect to see results. You have to remember you get paid off your decisions, so you get paid off how you think in your IQ in the markets. So, coming in kind of going to be reviewing Friday and then what we can do is we can go over any questions about the entirety of last week and kind of go over that. I had one scheduled for Friday, but thought I would kind of do it together with the giveaway I I going to announce on on the at 8:00 p.m. Uh we also do have a class next week which I'm very excited for. That will be pretty exciting cuz that will be just kind of me going to go through the or excuse me, going over the entire model uh specifically for 2026. Um which is very similar to the past couple years, but obviously it's had its refinements. Um and yeah, we've had a killer year this year clearly um inside the Discord as well where we've had periods where we've just been really well. And most importantly, we have we've had periods where you know, we've consolidated or maybe seen a bit of drawdown. And the important thing with that is you guys have been able to see exactly how I've been able to handle it as a trader which I think is by far the most important thing. I think when you come into a Discord, it's not just about solely winning and seeing a person win. It's about losing as well and seeing how that trader takes losses cuz you want the full 360, right? You want the full experience and we do that here so which is good. And for Friday's kind of review, we'll be talking about the one loser that we had which was a half hour loss. Um and kind of kind of go over the session for what it was. So coming coming into the session for my bias, um it was pretty pretty obvious I was pretty bullish with price specifically starting off onto the daily and how we were printing. It's clear that sentiment was looking to push new consistent highs. You guys could see ever since that new week opening gap that we had weeks ago. It's maybe a month now since that happened. I don't But we had we had some um Trump news, Iran news which got down the market. We saw ever since we started seeing price come up and fill that new week opening gap and trade past it, it's been clear upside since and we've seen large ROIs in the past specifically for April um in our trading because of the fact that we had seen markets start to follow through. And specifically for me, as you see price cre- uh keep installing new highs, keep creating new higher highs in the market, there's no reason for me to look to play downside. And I made this clear on Friday. If there was going to be a trade that we were going to take, it was going to be upside because my interest in downside was not there reason being higher time frame is clear as day interest in an upside. For me when it comes to you know pivotal takes you guys know this the two main components are price and where we put in the set higher low. So for a bearish reversal in the market what we're looking for price to do is put in a significant high off an area of liquidity which we do not have here right every time we create a new all time high it's a new high where we have to use psychological levels because there's no historical data. Clearly since it's an all time high so for me it's very hard to kind of just go based off like a sweep of a high of day because there is no historical data behind that. I truly believe in the factor of higher time frame liquidity historically that we come up take moment react off of. So we did have a session where we did play a short. >> [snorts] >> That was because we had a very bearish New York open. We had seen higher time frame arrays get kind of validated and then we had our entry looking for a simple continuation into an overnight low. However since you know not since but the majority of the past month I'd say we've been relatively entirely bullish right we've been taking upside trades only and clearly so I think it's been very valid and so so for me specifically like I said on the daily time frame I was very bullish because of the fact that we were consistently seeing engulfing daily candles right you take you take a sample size on the higher time frame and you look at the past you know month let's let's let's do it let's do it right one bearish one two two bearish three one two three four five bearish candles that you see on the daily time frame but if you go all the way from down here one two three four five [snorts] six seven eight nine 10 11 12 13 14. So essentially the last 20 trading days which would be a month exactly cuz the weekends are two days and typically trade month has 20 trading days in the last month um 14 out of the 20 days have closed out green. Uh that's significant for you guys to look at because when I see something like this, it's very hard for me to look to play the other side. The only way I would look to do that is if we saw a price be very decisive and follow through like we had that one session. I believe it was Was it Thursday trade? It was Thursday where we had that short up briefly kind of talk about it. And I'll go back to it, which was a day which was pretty crazy um cuz we had I think we had two winners, two losers that day, which is unlike us. But you look at the trade that we had for that Thursday. This was the first I think short attempt that we had in a very long time. And again, the reason we say that is because you look at that daily time frame with how those daily candles have closed out. Mind the fact that we are at literal all-time highs, but just looking at the daily time frame, this should tell you how engulfing or how much um interest price has in upside in the stock market at the current state. So for me, naturally already kind of having that downside sentiment is very hard because when you play with sentiment here, trading upside it's a lot easier just to kind of capitalize off, if that makes sense. Then, going down to the 4-hour time frame, you could see it's very simple in the way that it's it's pretty much the same thing where you see price consistently engulf, you see price consistently be one-sided and upside, and you see price consistently have much more bullish displacement in closures off these candles than you do off the bearish candles, if that makes sense. So, kind of coming into the open for me specifically, leading into [clears throat] that bullish narrative identified through higher time frame, what I wanted to see price do off the opening range move was either come down here and grab an area of liquidity like a London low, or see price come up here and take out Asia highs. And based off the reaction, we could look to play narrative. The reason again I use the opening range move time and time and time again is due to the fact that when I come into the New York open, historically for me as I found for myself as a trader, when I trade right off the open, I feel like most times it's gambling. The reason I say that is because a lot of times you don't have the actual real move happen until um past that 9:30 a.m. open, if that makes sense. So, for me specifically, waiting for an opening range move, which is typically an area of liquidity being taken out like an overnight high, overnight low. What that sets is that sets clarity in the market. You know exactly what you're looking for in price and what it wants to do, and it also gives us a great tool in order to be able to recognize if conditions are good or not. A lot of times, chat, when you guys see us not take trades in a day or be very cautious, it's due to the fact that price through New York trades within overnight highs and lows. Whenever we see price trade out of it, typically I like it a lot more because you're seeing decisiveness in the market, right? Decisiveness in the market, which is what we always want. Even if it's a range day, even if it's a continuation day, you want decisiveness in the market. So, with the opening range move here, you see price come up, and you see price take out our London high, and then we see price take out our our Asia high. Within the same 5-minute candle from here, very clear that upside interest was there because not only do we see the opening range move initially be bullish, but we also see it hold. This 5-minute candle, as engulfing as it was, should clearly tell you how much interest price had in higher. So, you look at 1-minute time frame, you see price also, you know, trade at a very bullish state, consecutively being bullish. From here, I guess the only challenging part with price being so bullish is the point of retracements. We did not get that in the morning. We did have one idea in the morning, which we did take a beautiful excuse me, we did mark up a beautiful long, which never came into play. So, if we go down here, we could see this is the first idea, which was a simple two 1-minute gaps combined inside of a 5-minute bullish for value gap. So, we had a 5-minute bullish for value gap paired with a two 1-minute gaps here. Now, so why use two 1-minute gaps, why not just use one 1-minute gap? Well, these are two inefficiencies in the market, two imbalances, and for me, as we always talk about, which are the best gaps to always mark out? It's typically gaps that are displacive. And so, for these two, these weren't very displacive, but they did have voids. Um, so I simply what I did is I simply marked out two inefficiencies and kind of combined them into one acting as acting as if it's one zone, which is still valid, right? If you go to the 2-minute time or excuse me, if you go to the 2-minute time frame, these these 2-minute gaps become become into one. So, we see price come down here and we see price initially, you know, look like it could potentially come down and retrace further on into this 1-minute gap, but it did not. We saw price come up here and unfortunately, we saw price see higher almost right away. And then pair that with me having a migraine in the morning, I was able to simply get off and had to take care of my migraine. Came back to PM session. We did end up start to consolidate after initially putting in that high through that opening range move or at the open move. Our high of the day was instilled at around 10:00 a.m. We did see price PM-wise come up here and coming into lunch hour create a new high, but we didn't see much follow through past that. However, my interest was still higher. I'd said in the stream, if we were going to take a trade, it was only going to be upside and I Now, obviously, you guys know through the identification in our bias. And then we ended up taking our first and only trade for the day, which was a long. It was a potential PM take bullish ICT with ES off a turtle low, I high day as target. Entering off a 1-minute bearish fair value gap into a bullish invert or excuse me, bullish inversion fair value gap. So, you guys know, bearish gap, we come up here, we see a closure over it, we violate that gap, that gap now flips and turns into a bullish inversion fair value gap. We then end up seeing price come up here. Unfortunately, we stop out, but first things first, we see price come up here and commit a clear clear entry model, right? We see clear confirmation where we see nice displacement come up here and we see a good closure. So, with this trade, although it was a loss, chat, I was very content with this trade being a losing trade. Reason being, I really liked the setup and this was a very technical setup. So, the setup factor with that with that ID, excuse me, is after recognizing a time frame and how bullish we were in trading all time highs, literal all time highs, and with the opening range move paired that up, I think it was very fair to assume that we could see higher draw. I guess the only challenging part with this trade right here is we ended up coming into the trade or coming into the PM session with already having a move in the open. The idea behind this trade was a simple SMT occurrence with NQ and ES as NQ created a higher Excuse me, a higher low. You could see that our 11:00 a.m. low on NQ was a higher low. Um whilst on ES, it was actually a lower low. So, we see this 11:00 a.m. low, boom, come down here. ES came down here, swept this low, whilst NQ did not. We then see price propel back up and we see the trade get offered. The idea behind this trade was a 1-minute wick low, aka swing low. Um we could have used our model stop, which would have been right here, right at the fair value gap candle wick low. Um that could have been the factor. That could have been the um That could have been the um stop loss for this trade. Did not really matter. Um we came up here, we saw a good closure over. My break even was a 1-minute wick high, really close to that take profit interest, which was high of day, aka all time highs. We see price initially come up here and with good confirmation, our timing, I think, was pretty decent off the start, but then we see price start to consolidate and eventually we come back down here. So, I guess the unfortunate trade thing with this trade, which we could kind of refer to and look at um is is the SMT, the divergence occurrence in between. So, before we took this trade, it was clear as day that NQ was obviously the leading asset as we had seen the SMT occur and we had seen um NQ propel into this inversion fair value gap pretty nicely, a little bit better than ES. However, the moment we took the trade, we see ES start to hold a lot better. As you see, right, our time of entry on NQ was, I believe, right here um at right here at 1:16 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. And you see price, for the most part, not really do much after, but if you look at ES from 1:16 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. um 1:16 You see price being a bit more engulfing here on ES, right? A great way to tell as well is off the retracement that we end up seeing price commit. 1:16 candle, you could see that price was The entry would have been here, and then you see off the retracement in this move that ES never came back down into that 1:16 candle entry price, whilst NQ did. So, a bit unfortunate. I will not complain about that too much cuz it wasn't anything significant. But, we end up seeing price curl off, and we see price come back down. What you can say about price PM-wise is it was very range-bound. And so, for us specifically, I think we just got caught up in this range. This, however, is a good loss that I'm willing to take all the time. It was a half-hour loss, but it's a loss I'm taking willing to take all the time cuz it was a good technical setup that I felt, you know, I I could take most times. So, if I ever take a trade and I look back and I'm like, \"Okay, this is a trade I would wouldn't typically take.\" That's a bad loser. In my opinion, this is a good loser because of the fact that, again, this is a trade I think I feel I take all the time. Just that didn't pan out. Price was very range-bound. I guess we could have been a bit more patient here, not taking this trade, maybe closed out for the session break even. But again, I was very content with this loser. From there on out, what we did, Chad, which is important, is after taking this loser, we had recognized conditions, and we left it for what it was. We did not revenge trade. We did not We didn't tell We didn't do any of those emotional things, right? We simply stood grounded, and although we took a loss, and although we're red on the day, we don't get phased because we know at the end of the day, as long as we have proper risk management and we follow our system, it's always going to work out. Our week still closed very well. We still have did a good job overall in the week, and you don't want to ruin that by simply being greedy or wanting a bit too much on a day where price isn't offering that much. So, that's pretty much that. And [snorts] so, yeah, if you guys have any questions, let's get right into it. >> [snorts] >> How much are that close? I still haven't calculated it to be honest. We're definitely green though for sure. Um like PNL wise I'm green on the week. So there's that. I I don't I don't know exactly. I could probably base it off just my PNL. I don't know my exact risk per trade. Um so I'm not sure really, but that that long PM wise on Thursday really clutched us up cuz check the first days first couple days of the week if you recall correctly were compound days where we were up like a little bit under an R each day. Um and then that Thursday take was really a take that put us over on the week. >> [snorts] >> How we uh how we go into the current week? Any comments about how uh how to affront this week? What do you mean? Can you be a bit more specific? Try looks like we're going for that New York open and gap fill. I'm about to I would like to take or excuse me, I might look to take a long offside if you prevent or offer. Why sometimes you enter a trade before a confirmation? For example, you're waiting for a 5-minute close. No no no no no. But here's the thing I know we we don't do 5-minute closures. We always do 1-minute closures, right? Our confirmation is always the same which is a 1-minute closure, right? So there's there's your answer. Um if you know the model entirely, you know that we enter off 1-minute confirmations through one minute one minute and five minute entries every single time. >> [snorts] >> What is considered PM for you? I think you have your lunch hour then anything past that is your PM session. I think people either start it from 12:00 or they consider it from 1:00. But either one works. What's the game plan for next week? I'm going to wait it or wait out and see how we kind of come into New York open. Every single day, we used to have a game plan channel in here, but I kind of just closed it off and I put my insight for our game plans on the commentary channel, uh but then also on our live streams. Uh but for me, I'm going to look how we trade overnight. We have this new week opening gap and I think based off how we trade off this new week opening gap will give us a good idea behind what price wants to do. It's too early to tell in my opinion for tomorrow. But it's it's clear as day we're still trading at all-time highs. So, right now if I had to assume, obviously you naturally lean bullish. Do I hope we see a bit of downside so we could work off historical levels? Yes, I don't want to see prices consistently create literal all-time highs every day. I don't want I wouldn't mind it cuz we'd probably be able to capitalize, but I'd prefer maybe a move down to be able to offer us an opportunity to work off levels again. >> [snorts] >> Shout-out to 140 guys rocking in here. W chatters. If the trade keeps working, you hold till before 5:00 p.m. Yeah, yeah. Always always always. Mhm, 100%. Yeah. Um unless we close out. Yeah, for sure. I always hold my trade until 5:00. Typically on my personal. For sure, buddy. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you for the kind words. How would you scale from zero with prop? Like which ones and how many accounts to get to start and finish? Well, it it's relative for every single one cuz every single person because I don't know what every single person's capital stance has nor nor do I know their skill set. But if I had to go based off me specifically, I think and there's two different things with prop firms. There's scalability, right? You want to scale and there's just good rules. Now, I think if I were a new trader, where I would have started from zero, I wouldn't be focused on scalability yet. So, what I would start is I would probably start with Lucid because they have probably the best best rules in the industry. Um in terms of accounts, they have a variety as well. So, probably Lucid or Trade the Five, maybe even Topstep. I know Topstep's been kind of down trending. But their rules on their sim funded accounts are very simple. Um so, I'd look if I was a new trader, I would start off with a firm that has very easy rules because when you just start off or when you when you're less experienced, it's already hard enough to trade and imagine trading on rules that are very hard. So, that's probably what I would do and then over time as you get consistent payouts, I'll probably reinvest and then look to scale into bigger firms like a Take Profit Trader, like an Apex, where you have a lot more upside. So, on the personal accounts, you don't really set a sell limit at any targets. Rather, you just let it run and set trailing stops like you said, only close if it rides. Yeah, typically. Ideally, the only way I would ever close out is if how I say um There's typically never It's typically Yeah, it's it's typically just me holding and trailing cuz I found historically through my system. Here's the truth about my live account chat and and trading. There's going to be periods where not much happens at all. There's going to be periods where my portfolio is just consolidated. There's going to be periods where I'm in drawdown. But I thrive the most when the markets thrive if that makes sense, right? You guys know how the markets operate. I mean, look at this year specifically, right? First couple months of this year have been hard cuz we've seen First couple months were just price up down up down in a range. So are my personal accounts, right? I was still doing decently well cuz I was able to, you know, use the model to my approach, but nothing like how I did in April, right? You guys saw how I did in on And the reason I cooked up the way I did it in April is because markets cooked up, right? Markets saw a large follow-through. And so in that duration, like in April, where markets follow-through like that, all I do is I simply trail and I let price let me allow or allow me to capitalize more and more and just trail my stops. And that is able to gap me over gap me over through a duration, right? So for example, January, February, March, those three first three months, >> [snorts] >> I probably netted around an average of anywhere from $100 to $2,000 a month on my live account. Um and then April, boom, $2 million $3 million a month, right? That averages it out. People don't like people, I guess when they trade, they think it's oh yeah, you come in and you make $10,000 a month consistently. It's that easy. No. Chat, you guys know this. With the markets, there's inconsistencies and there're consistencies. The markets aren't going to be perfect all the time. And so for me specifically, the reason I do what I do in terms of trailing um my trade and just allowing it to run is because in the durations of the markets following through, I simply capitalize the most I can. The best in the world, what they simply do is they know how to handle drawdown the best and capitalize the best. And for me specifically, what I found is when I let a trade go and keep doing its thing, I'm not capping myself as a trader on my personal account, I'm simply capitalizing more on the move. You said the other day when you get when you go BE, you base it on the model entry, not the actual entry. Do you have any other things that like you do that you have mentioned before? No, not really. That that's really it. I guess what I've mentioned in the past as well is I always have my take profits. So if I ever long and I have a TP in mind, I always have it a tick under just so I can avoid the potential of equal highs. That's maybe the one but I've I've mentioned that in the past. There's nothing else I like everything I do on live or like I teach, I do pretty much. But me mentioning like you using a model stop, that's more for more so for chat cuz for me I always typically always get the models model entry and most so do most guys in here. Like you guys once you're like once you know enough in here, which what typically just have to watch a couple videos. Once you understand how we operate in here and watch a couple lives, like you know exactly when we enter. If you know model entry, you're typically break even at the perfect spot every time, if that makes sense. >> [snorts] >> So I'd say for people who are like newer, if you don't know what model entry is yet, I'd say just specifically have your break even place model entry. That way if Lanto, you know, sees trade hit TP but you go break even, there's no excuse. >> [snorts] >> Yeah, I think Was it you that asked the question last week? But I think someone else someone asked in chat about um risk per trade. I think just it's important to make sure that you follow all the trades, cuz if you follow all the trades this week you're you're thriving, right? You shouldn't be down at all, if that makes sense. Um if you follow every single take, you're you're definitely thriving. Um so that's mainly it. Um how do you confidently trail your stop on large moves like that? I think it's just as markets just have tendencies I've just been trading long enough and I've realized that when the markets go, they go. When they consolidate, they consolidate pretty hard. It's just markets are very extreme typically. And so in conditions where, you know, we do consolidate, I think it's I think that's the one thing I do have to work on as a trader, chat, even for myself, like calling myself out here. It I think it's the identification of good versus bad conditions. If you guys go back to I think March was it, chat? Like the month before April or maybe a bit before that, we had durations where I had set take profits that were large in relative to what the markets were doing. So there were periods where the markets were really range bound, but I had take profits as if I'm looking for continuation moves, if that makes sense. So I think it's just that adjustment. And I'm naturally like for me, my favorite type of trade is just obviously continuation trade. Um I like capitalizing on trend. uh Um I think that's the most successful way you can operate in the market. To those out there who operate who are successful off pivoting and catching reversal trades, um in terms of just extreme pivots, fair. I like reversal trades, too. But in terms of probability, your probability is always there through continuation in my eyes cuz you're riding market sentiment. Um Yeah, I think it's just That's just the adjustment. That's a small refinement. It's okay, yo, Lance, so when markets are, you know, ranging, take range trades. Have realistic range take profits. You know, instead of riding a trend on your trade all the time, maybe in these type of conditions, look for a set realistic take profit and take your profit as opposed to, you know, consistently having one approach in the market in terms of take profits. You need that versatility, which I talk about, which is key. So like, chow, if the market's go back to ranging, you'll see me, instead of taking, you know, trades that are 5, 10, 15, 20 yd plus, you'll see me consistently look go for, you know, base hits and look to take a TP1, TP2 type of trade, if that makes sense. But since we're thriving now and the markets are really expansive and seeing massive follow-through, as we discussed, um you're going to see me operate in a way where I look to let the trade run out run out, right and cut out. >> [snorts] >> Um In your classes, we could do over Yeah, I got you. What's the max payout on a 100K on Apex and how much should I aim for? I don't know what Chow, what's the 100K payout? I forgot what it was. Uh but just be comfortable with you what you can afford to lose. Like if you can't afford to lose the account, A, you shouldn't be trading them. And if you do, just downsize and take your time with it. I think Apex markets and narrative, oh yeah, get payouts in 8 days or 5 days, whatever it is. Chow, whenever you see that, that's them just trying to force you to rush. Never rush. Take your time with it, always, Chow. Always, always, always take your time with everything. Um especially if you have less capital, um and you're more inexperienced, I think taking your time is what's important. I mean, you look at my guy, a great example, and I'll pull it up right right quick. I don't know if he's in here, but my guy right here, a beautiful example, is [snorts] his name is Toshi Trades and you could see he has uh posted his calendar consistently kind of his um progress through the duration of a month and you could see chat like he's not aiming for thousands of dollars a day's, right? He's compounding and he's taking his time with it. And he's able to get four payouts last month, chat. Four payouts, right? He made a [ __ ] ton of money simply compounding, right? And I think if you're at the position where you don't have the most capital, you could do this too as well, right? You just got to simply take your time. Remember, P&L, it's all relative. What you see here, it's all relative. He has a process which he follows, right? That's it. He stays patient and takes his trade when it's there. The only difference between him and me is I simply take more contracts per trade. That's literally it. Remember, P&L is the result. You have to focus on your process. So, >> [snorts] >> um Uh hey lights are the smartest say I appreciate everything you do this group you're not I appreciate everything you do in here. I'm going to take out beautiful one, man. Love it. Love it. Thank you for the kind words, appreciate it. In your model entry, you said in reversals, uh shift focus on inversions. It confused me, what does that mean? Um Oh, okay. Um in in in terms of the the one I posted, yeah, I think the best type of entries when it comes to reversal trades probably would have to be inversions. Um for me in terms of my favorite because here's the truth about reversals, at least for me, I prefer having reversal trades not offer much of a retracement if that makes sense. So, what I mean is so say you have like a low and you say you see price come down here and say you see price take out that low, what you're looking for price to do in my opinion, what my favorite thing is is where price comes up and we see price come up and after offer one retracement most. But and you know, how many times have you seen previously in the markets where we come down here, take out a significant low, you assume we have a reversal, but then we slowly glide up, offer a ton of retracements and eventually just come right back down. I think the most clear way to identify reversals in the market is when you see a liquidity area of interest where price comes down, takes it, and then displaces back up in the same speed if not more aggressive that it that it came back down if that makes sense. And typically what that means is typically you don't have many reverse or you don't have many retracements in the market, right? Because if if price is very bullish, right? Typically you will just have an upside direction. But if price isn't that bullish, you'll have much more retracements, much choppier conditions if that makes sense. Um so I'd rather prefer this over this because of the fact that the likelihood of us just retracing and heading for lower is a lot less likely when price is much more bullish and seeking a lot more continuation. So your entry being inversion entries, um I think you're like excuse me, um you being able to capitalize off inversion entries here is or here is a lot more likely than looking for a retracement if that makes sense. >> [snorts] >> JB, I don't know, you can ask him. Add him in here. He's in here. W Mez. Um Yeah, you're probably right here by the way. Yeah. This is it. You're right completely here. The only yeah, the only that decisive thing I need to do while some of the trade every time is probably my trail stop. Everything else is always predetermined, which I think is the most important thing cuz it simplifies my approach. I don't need to worry about my stop, my TP. I don't need to worry about anything but simply trail my stop. This is definitely important. How is your plan um when you need to pass the vowels? How would you recommend to do that? For me personally, if I'm being honest, I just size up and I take the risk. If I blow the account if I I blow the account, that's because I have the capital and I also believe in my skill set, right? If I blow Typically on evaluations, I give myself a couple hour at max and I simply take that for what it is. Just because I know even if I blow it, I'm likely going to pass the next attempt and get funded and then get the payout to kind of, you know, um recover the loss and obviously be profitable 10 times over. Um high low resistance or let me continue off this real quick. If you have less capital, I just say take your time with it. Just take it at a simple simple approach. Again, there's no need to rush in the market chat. I will always be here. The markets will always be here, right? The markets will never be closed unless we get unless the [ __ ] US got nuked and we had to close down, right? The markets are always going to be here. I promise you that. So, just take your time with it. High and low resistance environments, for sure. Let's see what Trey's what's your favorite song to get locked in before trading? Um I don't have a favorite song, to be honest. I don't know. I don't I don't I don't like to listen to any songs cuz I think if anything, I think it riles me up emotionally and it slightly makes me want to almost need to take a trade that day, if that makes sense. So, for me, I'll probably just listen to nothing or at max, I'll just listen to like lo-fi music, some calm music. Cuz if you if you ever like get riled up and feel like you need to succeed today, which is aka take a trade in for most people's head, it's like you're almost forcing a trade. Prior time for analysis, do you base the analysis on uh where you predict the price will go? For example, if price were was it near a high and or would you predict it take out the high and then therefore you'd be bullish? No, I'll naturally have my insight of where price current price is before anything. So, I'll never I'll only have a prediction if I already have my insight plugged in and I expect that move to happen. So, if I'm already bullish and there's a high there, right? Then I'll assume that high will get taken out, but I'll never just assume a high will get taken out without any set bias, if that makes sense. So, I'm always just always just um reacting, if that makes sense. So, you have a compare or so, you have compared the P&L on your props that are almost always TP at target one and see if that does better than your personal rather underperform much more simply do the one fall periods that letting traders run allow you you to get. No, I mean I don't know what's happening to my forehead. Um For me, specifically, I think I don't know if you looked into the risk management channel. There was a duration of this Discord where I would include set set R based off prop R and then personal R, but the video that we have in here, the risk management risk management video, excuse me, is a very good video. It kind of goes over my set system per each way I risk and I I I take profit on each type of account if that makes sense. And I found honestly, I mean obviously you guys see my personal account thriving a lot more based off R and I and I will say trading on personal income or your own personal money is a lot better cuz there's no restrictions, but more importantly my mindset when it comes to trading my personal account is different to when it comes to trading a prop account. Most props what they offer is they offer consistency rules. So you have like a cap on how much you can make per day. When that's the case, you don't need to be capitalizing on tremendous R. What you can simply look look look for is for compounds. So my mentality, my approach, my model, my system is the exact same on both. The only difference is is when I enter a trade, I'm completely content on my personal account with A how much how it goes and then B say we're in profit we see price glide up and we see price follow through extremely, I'll let it ride. On props, I don't do that cuz you don't need to. And if you wanted to do that, then you simply just size down. So like say on a 150k Lucid account, straight to funded account, your consistency on payout one is typically 1800 bucks. You can either risk, you know, $1000, look for a one to one or like risk $600 per trade and need a three R to cop out on the day. Or if you want just kind of ride those big trades that are five R plus, you just simply downsize and your risk could be a fifth of that five R if that makes sense. That's kind of the approach. So it's just compounding for props and then for personal account, I specifically just look for trading the way I do. Like chat, my win rate on prop accounts is significantly higher than my personal account cuz there's trades in my personal account that I take that are high risk that I'm content with taking because I know at the end of the day, the moment, you know, I or I'm content because I don't need a high win rate on my personal account, right? My average R compared to props is significantly different because on props I take a TP1, on personal I don't, if that makes sense. So, yeah. Hello Silk, could I ask how you do or how do you know when not to take the first presenting entry? Example, on Friday there was room for shorts initially, but you didn't take off the initial for right gap. That was below selling session where we had pre-market selling. I don't get what you made when they take a good for long. Uh good question. I've here I've talked about this in the past as well. This is a large thing I talked about I think late of late last year. For me specifically chat, what I look for when it comes to reversal is displacement. That's the number one thing. In both ways what I'm going to say. One, displacement in the gap that we end up taking off of. So, you compare to this this gap as opposed to this gap, which by the way you marked out this gap wrong if I'm already did you don't, excuse me. This gap versus this gap in relative, you see this gap not be anywhere near the displacement as opposed to this gap right here specifically. And two, kind of going back to Braden's question with inversion entries. When it comes to reversals, I prefer inversion entries because what you're looking for price to do is come up and violate a bearish gap creating a bullish sequence. Um and so you see price come up here and showcase that displacement. The reason I'm comfortable with taking this trade, I want you in your mind to get rid of these gaps and simply look at price. In your head, are you more comfortable taking a long off a steeper retracement after just putting in a low, or are you more comfortable in price creating a higher low showing you that coming up here and um displacing a bit more, right? Is this is this this more convincing to you that price will go higher, or is this candle more convincing to you if that makes sense? That's why I kind of view it. When it comes to reversals, even though we're taking a reversal trade, I still want some type of probability and what always gives you probability or always tells you that probability is there, price action. And you see price here on the midst of creating a higher low, we see price come up and we see price just purely off displacement showcase a lot more bullish potential in this move up as opposed to this here if that makes sense. Now you pair that up with the gaps that we end up taking, which was this one minute gap go invert, which was a more dis place of gap, meaning had we come up here and seen price violate this gap, we violate a much bigger imbalance compared to this. That drives up your probability if that makes sense. So, that's kind of answering your question. For me specifically, I always avoid a gap like this because you're you don't have the most most bullish displacement. Like going back to Brandon's question cuz I just deleted it. Right here. Right. What you're doing here is you're taking an entry right after putting in a low. What I'm looking for as a trader in reversals is I'm looking for more displacement, right? More displacement gives you higher probability in my eyes, which is what you want ideally at the end of the day. Oh. I'm sorry. Yeah, that's why Oki asked a question but let me rephrase it. I'm sure you made mistakes on your way to different milestones but what would you do do differently knowing everything you know now? Is it just investing back into prop firms, investing into ETFs, like anything that I should know that is important? Okay, to get to that point, I think I think if I'll be honest, the mentality is what's helped me cuz when I initially first got profitable, I think obviously I was profitable but I wasn't as profitable as I could have been because my mentality still was not there. I think really slowing down and realizing, \"Yo, dude, I have a whole lifetime ahead of me. I could really just relax, analyze, and just simply take it day by day is what's most important. The reason I have installed, quote unquote, one and only mindset is because that mindset is for people who need to slow down. Look at myself, too, as well, cuz a lot of times, I'm sure, as you guys do, as I've done, we get ahead of ourselves. Oh, if I just take this trade today, boom, if I would just make this much money today, I can make this much a month. No, that's not the right mindset to more so have. I think if I were to tell myself when I first started is just to slow down because I always felt rushed because of the fact that I would still have in my brain. I would always be like, I need to get to this by this point. No. Chat, the craziest thing, here's a fun fact, my biggest winning days in the history of winning days I've ever had were not like I I didn't come into the session expecting that to happen, if that makes sense. Um My biggest My first biggest day ever was $150,000, I think, or $100,000 on Topstep. I did not expect that was going to happen. Then it was $150,000. I did not expect that happening. Then um TPT happened. Did I expect that happening? No. Then this happened in April. Did I expect that happening? No. It happened naturally because I simply took it one day at a time and I kept on following my plan, if that makes sense. So, the most important thing I would probably say is your mindset. In terms of like an investing standpoint, I think the best the safest way you can always go, as we always have or as we have an investment channel in here, is investing in proven assets. So, for me specifically, ETFs, um and then crypto, Ethereum and Bitcoin. Right, SPY, QQQ, Ethereum, Bitcoin, those four things I mainly invest in. Once those offer a severe discount, I always take entry. I don't give a [ __ ] what anyone says. People always on social media like, \"Oh, Ethereum's dropping this this this this this.\" I don't care. Right? If there's a proven asset, which I've shown which I shown you over sample size or a long extended sample size that it's consistently profitable, where you're seeing price consistently creating new highs, new all-time highs, like a SPY, like a QQQ, like an Ethereum, like a Bitcoin, I always simply invest in supreme discounts. Go back to last April when we had that massive dump last year April this time. You saw the markets historically dump. Most people were freaking out on crypto, on Ethereum, on Bitcoin, on stocks, on NQ, on ES. I was not. I was actually very grateful because we had a very discounted entry because specifically for NQ and ES, we've had over what, a century, 150 years, or however long it's been of proven data that prices consistently creating new all-time highs. Why the [ __ ] would I not invest when it's discounted if that makes sense? That's simply my mindset. So, yeah. >> [snorts] >> All right, I'm going to wrap this up soon, chat, cuz I'm going to do this giveaway, but a great freaking live. My throat's kind of cooked. >> [snorts] >> All right, y'all. I'm 21, making 10k in 2020 but during sales net worth 170k feeling behind comparing myself to you and Brian Desean after trading since 2020. I have money, should [snorts] I risk more than $200 to achieve my goal? No, bro. I mean, dude, here here You know what the [ __ ] part is, Nasdaq? I'm 23 and I still feel like I'm behind. Crazy as that sounds, um but I think it's important to make sure that you don't let that mindset What is this [ __ ] Why am I shoot Dude, you will never ever catch me wearing shoes like this. Uh-uh. Um >> [laughter] >> I think it's important not to get caught up in that mindset, um but just simply take it one day at a time. I think me installing the thing that I do in here Discord, which is that one and only mindset, is what's really helped me slow it down cuz the Like I said before, I feel like I grow the most when I slow it down the most, if that makes sense. As crazy that sounds, when I slow [ __ ] down, I feel like I do the most. Right? If you want to be straight up, how will premium Discord have a better chance at giveaway? If you want to be straight up, I'm going to go on Twitter, look at the comments, and people I know in here on the Discord, right? Um I'm going to pick out selectively. That's what it says, \"What is the hardest thing um and how did you overcome?\" I'll either do that or I'm going to just do a spin the wheel and just double-check and make sure most are you guys. What was the hardest thing you did to overcome? I think the hardest thing I don't know. There's a lot of hardship. I don't know. There's a lot of hardship. It's [ __ ] tough. It's a good question. Hardest thing I had to overcome. I think the hardest thing I had to overcome is when I first started trading, realizing that this is not going to work out for a little bit, right? When you first start trading, it's the biggest liability, but over time, as you improve that skill set and becomes profitable, it turns into the biggest asset. So, what most people will try to do is they initially come into the market, they go to social media, they see so many traders do super well, and they assume in in their head, \"Oh yeah, a couple weeks of work, I should get to that point.\" This that, this that, no. You have to put in time and effort, and I think I had to swallow my pride and ego and realize that, \"Yo, okay, it's going to take me quite a bit to get to where I need to.\" But I'm kind of blessed that it happened, if that makes sense. Um So, let's get back at PR, no, not yet. >> [snorts] >> How long will that to be for the service? I'll be here for for a minute. For a minute. Is Are you concerned cuz of the the mini retirement posted out on Twitter? Trey, you have to I've said this multiple times, you have to realize that post isn't relative to me what what it comes to my trading. As you guys know, like I've been sizing a large sum in order to make what I've been making. That post was talking in in reference to or in reference to my trading. So, in terms of that, like it's it's I don't know if I want to take a break when it comes to sizing. I've I've definitely downsized since then. But that was talking about that. When it comes to the Discord, like I Chat, here's the crazy thing. I don't think I'll ever like get off Discord if that makes sense. Like I'll never leave Discord cuz I feel like even if I retire, I'll get bored pretty quick and come right back and like at the minimum go live with you guys cuz I truthfully like most times I truthfully enjoy going live and like doing what I do. It's just like it makes me fulfilled and it keeps me busy. Um so I don't I don't think I'll ever stop that if I'm being honest. >> [snorts] >> Do you ever do options? Yes, that's what I started off at. I started trading options when I was 17 years old. This what it Discord was start off. Let me show you real quick before I wrap it up. Go to the archive. Chat, remember the 1 to 10k challenges? Let me go to the announcers the old announcers page. Announcers announcers announcers right here. Go all the way back. Let me scroll scroll scroll. 6 5 2022 Been doing this for a long time. Yeah, for anyone in here who Chat, if like here here here's what like if what the the moment I stop selling lifetime is when you knew when you like know within like a 6 to 12 month duration I'll like back off of Discord. The only way I see myself stopping though is if like I I start like family maybe. That's not coming for a long time. But like if I still have lifetime up like for for pay or if like someone to buy like at minimum it's a year guaranteed that I'm here if that makes sense. Did you stop or stop? No. I don't really stop. I just switch over to futures because the one thing with options is I was already an index trader so I already traded spy and QQQ. For me I feel like if you trade those two you should be on futures cuz there's there's no Greeks, right? As you guys know on options if you've traded it there's Greeks and specifically theta which is a pain in the ass and like with futures like it's very everything's very defined. So that's that's really it. >> [snorts] >> How many trades have I taken a day? Ideally one one or two. Sometimes we'll have a bit more like Thursday we had four. Uh but we have one and oh mindset. So if we come we come into the market we can if we capitalize on a good trade we simply wrap up the day and simply compound our day. I take it one day at a time. That mindset's really helped me with my trading so I just installed it in here. Yeah. All right y'all I'm going to wrap it up here. Great freaking stuff. Um 47-minute review beautiful. I'm going to upload this and yeah I'm going to have the announcement giveaway in about 10 minutes or so. With that being said stay safe guys. We are live tomorrow morning at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. Tune in and have a great rest of your day chat. Peace out.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/W_g_aBoJyFo" }, { "id": "KWr4tIbAkac", "content_type": "video", "title": "Losing -$34,000 Day Trading in 4 Hours (Psychology Was Off!)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWr4tIbAkac", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 12, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 6.4, "shared_a_plus_score": 10.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1803, "duration_seconds": 635, "chart_count": 15, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 42.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 84.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 127.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 169.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 211.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 253.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 296.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 338.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 380.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 423.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 465.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 507.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 550.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_14.png" }, { "file": "chart_15.png", "t_sec": 592.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_15.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/KWr4tIbAkac/chart_15.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "KWr4tIbAkac", "content_type": "video", "title": "Losing -$34,000 Day Trading in 4 Hours (Psychology Was Off!)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWr4tIbAkac", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 635, "view_count": 1803, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 12180, "transcript_path": "KWr4tIbAkac/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 42.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 84.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 127.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 169.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 211.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 253.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 296.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 338.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 380.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 423.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 465.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 507.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 550.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_15.png", "t_sec": 592.5 } ], "chart_count": 15, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "orm", "short", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "take profit", "fair value gap", "liquidity", "bias", "setup", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "loss", "losing", "session", "scalp", "nq", "es", "execution" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 6.4, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "drawdown", "invalidation", "psychology" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "fair value gap", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york", "invalidation" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:50 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm down over $34,000 day-trading, taking this one trade which stopped me out in the market. Recently, we've been thriving, but today we took a loss and it's obviously always important to be transparent. This was the trade right here. It was a 5-minute BPR violation short which we looked for and saw invalidation off of. But before we do that, before I explain the trade, let's get into exactly how I determine my bias, why I determined price was good enough to trade, and what we could have done better through our execution. So, to start off looking at higher time frames, what we were able to get a gauge of was price through ES and NQ. The first one of the most important things in the market to look at are the highs and lows that we put in through higher time frame. Well, if you look at the highs and lows that we put in specifically all-time highs on NQ, you could see that there was highs created on June 1st >> [snorts] >> which we had seen price on NQ come up and take out. But however, on ES, we had seen price essentially come up, tease the high, not take the high, and see a push back down. So, you see a SMT occurrence here through price. Oops, wrote that wrong. This is the right high. You see an SMT occurrence with ES not taking out its all-time highs off the June 1st high, but you see NQ do that. So, you have bearish SMT created in the market again as NQ creates a higher high and ES creates a lower high. From there, that was one of our key aspects in terms of our bias today. From there on out as well, a great way to get a gauge behind what the markets want to do is always price action. And price action trumps all. And so for me specifically coming into the PM session, which I avoided the AM session, I was sick this morning, skipped it, came and traded the PM session, we had seen a very large AM sell. If we dumb it down here, go to the 15-minute time frame, right, [snorts] and we're able to look at price, what you can see is we see a little large tremendous sell and you see the com- or combination of overnight price alongside New York trade relatively bearish. You initially are met with an Asia sell here off the open. We do see price chop for the most part, but London sold off slowly but surely and New York simply extended that. So, utilizing the opening range move and also identifying the bearish SMT that we had off all-time highs, we were already lining up for a bearish bias. I will say had I traded the morning, there definitely [snorts] probably would have been a better opportunity. The unfortunate thing here with price was that price was not the best at all today through AM and through the PM session. Let me explain. Well, if you look at the open here, as you guys know with the opening range move and what we use, that is called the ORM, right? The ORM is essentially where you wait for the first move of liquidity after New York open, typically an overnight high or low. So, for today's example, we would be using London lows because it's the first area, right, that we end up taking out in terms of liquidity. But, here's the thing. Off the open, we come down here and we take out that low, but we don't offer an entry model to play into that bearish bias. So, although I did not trade the morning, the probability of me missing out and not taking the trade was very likely because the opening range move occurred >> [snorts] >> and if you were short biased like, you know, I was in reference to the AM, even off the AM, there was not an entry. The only retracement candle that we had off the off the open was this 9:38 AM 1-minute candle. Aside from that, it was straight sell, all red candles, all black candles, and you end up seeing price come down more and more and more. And that was the by far the biggest move of the day. We do end up seeing a beautiful after-hour session dump, but obviously we don't trade after hours. We end up seeing price come down and we see a good move from there. What I was simply looking for was I was looking for clarity in price to continue down lower. Again, the unfortunate thing was that price was not the best. A great way to always get an indication of price is look at the time it takes to see the certain moves that we see. So, for example, off the open through here, down into the low created here, we end up seeing specifically from the high down [snorts] to this low on ES, within about 15 minutes of trading, we end up seeing about a 35-point sell sequence on ES. However, if you compare this swing high down to this relative low, we end up seeing a 36-point move within what? What would that be? 10:40 down to 12:45 in 2 hours. So, we see equally the same move in terms of points in 2 hours here as opposed to 15 minutes here. So, you see the volatility and more precisely, you see price in its eagerness and want and lower be a lot more higher here and significant here rather than here. So, I would say in the morning if I was live, there's probably a good chance I don't take a trade, but the bias would have planned or panned out. Now, coming into the PM session, my bias was still lower. Although, we were very consolidated, I felt had been seeing price pick up and seeing a good, uh, you know, tremendous sell sequence here coming down and confirming off this trade that we ended up taking that we could see price potentially trade lower. Here's the thing. We've done a great job in the past couple weeks being very patient. Last week, we only traded two out of the five trading days, closed out for over a five-hour of the week. You know, coming into today, we're up a four-hour on the week. Now, we're, you know, up around a plus three-hour because we took a minus one-hour hit today. But, what we were doing up until today, past couple weeks, is we've been very patient. What I mean by that is we recognize price when it's not the best, as we just discussed in that it's moving a lot slower through a longer amount of time. You see price trade very up and down. And for me, I still came into this with the potential of taking a short in mind. I will say this, the entry model was not the worst. We've taken these setups quite often the past couple weeks. If you guys have been watching live reviews as well where I post on YouTube, um, or you're in the Discord, um, we end up taking or we end up taking a lot of BPR violation entries. However, as we've talked about BPR violation entries, the entry model precisely is not just the entire trade. It's not like you see a violation of a gap and boom, you immediately take a trade just cuz we violated it. No. We have all our components and we can see that price was clearly not the best. The idea with this trade again was a 5-minute bullish BPR violation, which is a balanced price range. You have a bearish fair value gap and a bullish fair value gap, which turns into a bearish inversion fair value gap, right? So, what we're looking for here Excuse me. Excuse me. Excuse me. Excuse me. Excuse me. Excuse me. Said that wrong. You have a bearish gap, which turns into a bullish inversion fair value gap, and then you have a bullish 5-minute gap. So, this is a bullish BPR. We had them coming down here on the on the 1-minute time frame, we do end up seeing price close under with utilizing our confirmation. Our confirmation entry was at 1:18 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, and you see me mention via text, \"I am short\" to my community. I'm also obviously executing this via live stream. Um we end up taking this trade, and we end up seeing price essentially go into drawdown right away, where we eventually came down and traded past that relative high. I will say, I guess the unfortunate thing here with price is that we still end up seeing validation in our take profit interest. Our take profit interest in this trade was this 4-hour FEG fill, as I've mentioned in the commentary piece here. And we do end up seeing that low get taken out, right? That level in 7544, we do end up taking that area of interest. However, we end up seeing price chop and consolidate [snorts] for the most part before seeing that move. So, Lando, on any given day the past couple weeks, although he has his bearish bias and believes that we can see lower, he's still not taking a trade here because he recognizes how slow and how bad price action is. And today is a great example moving forward that we can use that chat. No matter what, even if you have the right bias, which is what we did in hindsight, we had our right the right bias as we traded lower and saw targets get hit, timing is very important. And the biggest indication of timing is price action. And when price action is not trading the best, it's not a good indication that you're you're going to be able time and have high probability. That was the case here, right? We took a trade in conditions which were good. We should have ideally sat out and not taken a trade. That was best case scenario. Um so, that's pretty much it for the short. We do end up taking a long furthermore going on after recognizing we end up seeing some SMT off the low. We had bullish SMT off low of day where we had seen NQ create a higher low and we had seen ES create a lower low right here. Um we end up taking a scalp idea. This is primarily just a scalp. I'm not expecting a full on reversal in the market, but I'm expecting a scalp idea where we end up taking a 5-minute bullish for rally gap retracement tap and entry. Now, what I tell you guys, this is probably one of my most like annoying trades I've held in quite some time. It was very annoying. This is probably the first time we've had to hold the trade like this for this long in consolidation probably since quarter one this year. Um and so, we end up taking this trade and this is another again another good indication of why it's important to recognize price and no matter what, just because you see a violation of a gap or just because you've been set bias, if if price is not following through and it's not there for you, price trumps all, right? You're not going to make money. And so, for today, we have that short which ends up ends up just consolidating. Price consolidates back in, you know, up higher and then sees that move lower, hard to time. And then you have this here as well, which we end up taking a long. We see price end up trading back higher. I'm not going to hate this trade. I'm not going to, you know, punch myself over it. But here's the thing is on a day like today, you ideally be patient and the best case scenario, you just don't end up taking a trade in my eyes. Um very low probability in terms of timing. Again, you could have the right bias, but when price is bad, it's very hard to time as scalpers. We end up taking entry and we end up seeing price come up here. We go risk-free on this trade, go break even stops. As you see me mention here, right? I say I am long. And then we end up seeing price furthermore essentially come back down and we go break even on this trade. So, about 4 hours of me live trading today and we end up seeing a minus one hour of the day. For most people, psychologically, they could get upset because of that. Oh, I traded, you know, I was online or I was doing this for 4 hours. I was working for 4 hours, and I made no money. I actually, indeed, end up losing money. I mean, I lost $35,000 today, right? But, here's the thing. It's trading. It happens. There's going to be days, as we've done had live reviews before explaining where we've made much more in a lot less time. What you do in trading is you get paid for the decisions that you make in the stock market. What we end up doing today is consciously make a decision to enter a trading conditions that were not the best, and we ended up paying for it. Our first losing session in quite some time has to be like almost if I had to assume it was within 3 weeks. Um and that's because we were just less patient that we've that we've been the past um couple weeks. So, that's pretty much that. Hopefully, this review helps. And if there's one thing I want you guys to take away from this, price trumps all and follow price. Hopefully, you guys enjoyed this recap. I'll catch you guys in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/KWr4tIbAkac" }, { "id": "E7NF4AL-1O0", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +51,000 Day Trading in 10 Minutes! (1-0)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7NF4AL-1O0", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 13, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 6.4, "shared_a_plus_score": 10.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1374, "duration_seconds": 528, "chart_count": 13, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 81.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 121.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 162.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 202.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 243.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 284.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 324.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 365.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 405.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 446.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 486.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/E7NF4AL-1O0/chart_13.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "E7NF4AL-1O0", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +51,000 Day Trading in 10 Minutes! (1-0)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7NF4AL-1O0", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 528, "view_count": 1374, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 10222, "transcript_path": "E7NF4AL-1O0/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 81.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 121.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 162.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 202.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 243.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 284.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 324.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 365.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 405.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 446.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 486.9 } ], "chart_count": 13, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "short", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "take profit", "fair value gap", "bias", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "loss", "making", "session", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 6.4, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "stop loss", "invalidation", "fomo" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "fair value gap", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york", "invalidation", "invalidate" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:41 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I made over $51,000 day trading live, and this is the trade I took right here. A simple one-to-one. Usually, my R is a bit higher, but today's trade was a very much so compound take. We'll be going over that, but before we go over the trade exactly, let's talk about my bias. Let's talk about what I thought about, why I took the trade where I did, and what caused me to take profit where I did. So, starting off coming into the open, it was pretty simple. Looking at price through ES and NQ, we had a pretty clear objective in mind. First things first, the low that we had put on on ES was a very confident low I was in. We had seen a good sell prior to the past couple of day days. So, naturally, if you've been bearish the past couple days, and maybe you were a bit more bearish leaning into that sentiment today, I don't think it was the worst thing in the world. But, what are the two components we always talk about in these reviews when it comes to identifying a reversal in the market? It's the low being put in place, and it's also the displacement that we get off the low. So, for a bullish reversal, we see a strong low put in on ES here precisely as we take out a higher time frame internal low. Then, we see price come back up here and start to displace through an overnight sequence. Most importantly and most impressively, when you see overnight price, which is component number two in identifying bias, you see price for the most part through London see a tremendous buy. A good buy sequence where we come up and we see a consistent push past these Asia highs, and continuing on forward. We had a couple levels here that we drew up coming into the New York open, and we did end up seeing price come up here and take those highs out. Coming into the open through NQ specifically, I was a bit more bullish compared to ES because of the fact of our range. I talked about this at the top of the live stream where I live trade every single day, and you see marking out our high through yesterday's New York session, or excuse me, yesterday's New York session to the low that we had through Asia last night. You compare that, and you can see coming into the open where NQ was trading in contrast to what ES was trading at. If you do the same thing for ES here, you could see that ES is high to low around the open. At best, what we were trading at was we were trading at the midpoint of the range, right? So, you see about at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Standard Time, so about right here, you see price come up here and you see price fill that hourly BPR. Then, we see price essentially trade and consolidate for a bit at the half point of the range from the high to the low. But, with NQ at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Standard Time, we're much higher, right? We're seeing price trade all the way up here, which is about 70% or so inside this range as opposed to ES being about 50% of this range. So, coming into the open, what I looked for was good displacement on NQ after favoring NQ for the asset which was leading. Again, higher time frame we put in a significant low through ES, and most importantly, we saw clear displacement through overnight price. Overnight price did not chop, it did not consolidate. What we saw is we saw a higher time frame low put in place, and we saw two sessions last night through Asia and London accumulate and distribute towards the upside, which is what you want, giving us a clear idea of what we wanted to see price do through the open. Now, all it is is the opening range moving. Clearly off the open, you could tell that NQ was very bullish. We see price open up and we have our biggest 5-minute candle through overnight price where we see price engulf up higher. This is a good indication for potentially what's to come in price. However, here's the one thing with today that was a bit of a tough battle similar to the past couple days this week. Although we've seen good movement off the opens through New York, which I completely agree with, it's been a bit more difficult. Reason being, these movements are completely one directional entirely. So, what I mean by that is we open up a lot of times and we see price just completely delivered towards the upside or the downside without a single retracement. We do end up taking a trade today after recognizing our bias and wanting to be risk-on due to the fact that we had clear draw in PDH previous day high. However, we don't end up or offering an entry until our only entry which we end up taking here through this time zone, right? So, you see price off the open pump and ideally I take a long essentially at a point where I preferably would not like to take which is very close into draw, but that was the only draw or the only trade that offered, right? Off the open it was just straight pump candles on NQ, NQ being the stronger asset. We see a much more aggressive buy and you see price essentially come up here. So, the entry model and the criteria for this trade after recognizing our bias, after recognizing overnight price, after recognizing the opening range move all point upside. What we were looking for here to do is be risk on and look to ride a continuation model trade with sentiment, with trend into our previous day high. We see price essentially come up here and we see price retrace initially off a rebalance, but we then close under. I got a couple questions about this today inside my Discord live and also on Twitter where some people were asking, \"Leto, this was one of a bullish gap right here that you wanted to go long off of and rebalance and saw closure over.\" Well, here's the important thing. That is true. We do end up invalidating and violating this gap. However, what I want you guys to do is to remember that trading is not perfect every day, right? It's not mechanical to the point where every single criteria is going to line up perfectly. For us, the reason we were risk on here, the reason we take this trade was not only because of the entry model, but it was due to the fact of how bullish we were. Like we said, our bias, overnight price, higher time frame, opening range move all were really pointing towards towards upside into a clear area of draw being that previous day high, PDH and 28178. For me specifically, the reason I'm more so prone into taking this trade more than anything else is yes, we wanted an entry model, but most importantly we wanted to time our entry into that high. So, that was what entry models or this entry model was and what entry models do overall. Entry models help provide timing in the market because sometimes if you FOMO in, if you have no entry criteria, you could enter at a very bad state, see price come down, invalidate your trade, but not invalidate your draw or your bias, right? That's happened a couple times to me, you know, in my career. It's happened a few times this week, right? We We took a trade a couple days ago. I think it was Tuesday where we went one for two, closed out green, but the first trade was a short that got stopped out, and we still ended up seeing price dump all the way down. Um So, entry models help with the criteria in terms of your entries, and more so the timing in the trade. So, we see price come down here. We see price close under this gap, but what we then do is we see price come back up, and we see price reclaim over it. So, I you know, although we saw closure below it, and we saw price create a 1-minute bearish inversion fair value gap, what do we then do right away after? We see price create a higher low, and we see price engulf back up at the same speed, if not more aggressive, through the rebalance, invalidating and violating this 1-minute bearish inversion fair value gap. So, you see a bearish gap, a bullish gap which which which turned bearish, then see violation. So, this this confirmation here acts as bullish of an entry as it did through the initial rebalance, if that makes sense. That's how I view the perspective. That paired up with the fact of how bullish we were, and how risk-on we wanted to be due to how clear our objective was here, um we then put risk-on here through our confirmation candle. We took this live in front of 100-plus people, where we saw price come up here, and we saw price run through PDH for beautiful TP. The R on this trade wasn't phenomenal. It was about a 1.1 to 1 R. Typically, with an R of my might, I usually trade about 1.5 to 2 R plus for TP1. Today was a lot less because, again, we did not end up getting an entry until all the way up here, right? Off the open, we just pump up pump. We did not end up getting our entry until here. And then, you know, this is the only entry into PDH the entire morning. That's what price has been doing a bit more consistently as of recently, but you see price offer that today. Our stop loss was this 1-minute wick low. I guess you could have gone gone route out of low if you wanted to keep a very tight stop, but I felt as if if price were to come down and take that route out of low there was still a chance we could see still see price trade up higher. So a good invalidation point there and we ended up seeing price for the most part afterwards initially create a new high, but until power hour consolidate. And I'm very happy with the trade today and I'm very happy calling it a one and oh day and this is what's most important. We just went over our trade, but what's important is what we did afterwards which is stay cash and be content with our day. We've recognized that price as of recent in the past couple weeks maybe couple couple months now not trade at the best state. So when we capitalize our trade it's most important to know that you stay cash. Why? Well, realistically already in typical good conditions you maybe have an A+ trade one to three times a day. So in bad conditions once you capitalize on your good trade and you see price run into draw what's the likelihood you'll have as clear of a bias, as clear of a draw, and as clear as price sentiment again today, right? So just being realistic we took our day for what it is and we simply moved forward. So that's pretty much that. That's the day. Hope you guys enjoyed this review and I'm going to catch you guys in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/E7NF4AL-1O0" }, { "id": "42cw8do-POs", "content_type": "video", "title": "Losing -$40,000 Trading SLOPPY on Live! (-1R)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42cw8do-POs", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 14, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 3.2, "shared_a_plus_score": 10.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1229, "duration_seconds": 400, "chart_count": 9, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 44.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 88.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 133.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 177.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 222.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 266.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 311.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 355.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/42cw8do-POs/chart_09.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "42cw8do-POs", "content_type": "video", "title": "Losing -$40,000 Trading SLOPPY on Live! (-1R)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42cw8do-POs", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 400, "view_count": 1229, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 7397, "transcript_path": "42cw8do-POs/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 44.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 88.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 133.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 177.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 222.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 266.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 311.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 355.5 } ], "chart_count": 9, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "fair value gap", "liquidity", "bias", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "loss", "losing", "session", "nq", "es", "execution" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 3.2, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "stop loss" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "fair value gap", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york", "invalidate" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:54 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm just down over $40,000 on the trading day, and in this review, I'll be talking about the losers that we ended up taking, um how we more so had our bias developed, what went wrong, and how we could improve from this. So, let's get right into it. Today was a pretty tough day. Again, it was a half hour day, which you guys don't know, with the room that I uh have, we size specifically on certain days, and we use R as our risk as it's the most transparent in my um experience. Through doing Discord, right? It's easiest to follow. Everyone has their set dollar risks defined cuz not everyone has as much money as I do, or some people might have more, some people some people might have less. R essentially is just the most transparent way, that way we could all equally be up or down R wise. Today, we're down a minus one R, took two half hour losers, and I'll be going over them. So, kind of looking at the screen, you could see that the first idea here in play was a potential long. Now, why was your bias upside here off the open? Well, if you look at the open here, and you look at the 15-minute time frame initially on ES, we did a good job through building structure overnight after initially seeing ES come down here through Asia, and then see a dump. We saw structure develop. We saw a good push back up through London, and we saw a good push past Asia highs for us to potentially look to take a long in play. We see a retracement here, but we see price come down into this 15-minute gap, then eventually see a push back up. But, the more important thing, and why I was relatively bullish here for price off the open, was because of the fact that we had an hourly time frame BPR. So, if we go to that BPR real quick, you could see that this is the BPR that we had, if I recall correctly, right here. This is the BPR that we had. So, this in conjunction with this right here, we had an hourly BPR, which which is a balanced price range. Um and you see, right, obviously not this price this p.m. This is after our trading session, but you could see up until the point of the open, we see price yet again bounce to BPR, right? We have bounced it several times. Here, once, here, twice, here, three times, and now a fourth time, right? So, for me, hourly bounced off the PPR, and then you see London coming into the open trade relatively bullish. So, that junction is what caused my initial bullish upside. However, here is the thing with the trade. If you look at the trade here and we end up taking it, was a 5-minute bearish gap go bullish inversion, and we end up seeing price essentially come up here and offer the initial inversion entry. Here's the problem. I still end up taking this trade after our initial liquidity target gets taken out. So, if you look at the idea that I end up posting, right? Ideally, the time and place in which we take this trade as the as or would be the initial inversion, right? We always typically take our trade entries off the invert sequence. So, instead of my entry being here, it should have been more so around here. Therefore, I would have taken this trade with liquidity still being open. However, after with our actual entry, we end up taking this trade after liquidity was already taken. So, that was the one improper thing that we did with execution on this trade. I think the overall idea behind this trade was good. It was just an internal day, and this trade idea did not pan out because we had already taken liquidity in the London high. Um and so, we end up seeing price essentially create a lower high as opposed to create a higher high, and eventually see price come back down. So, the stop loss off the trade, if you're curious, was the model stop in place, which was the 5-minute fair value gap wick low, right? Wick lower candle open, um preferably. And we see price essentially come down here and essentially get rid of that. It was a good stop and validation because we see prompt price drop quite a bit lower, eventually leading into overnight lows. But again, the thing that we could have done here is avoid this and utilize the proper execution. As every time, chat, what's the number one thing we always focus on when it comes to developing our bias? It's also draw. And draw was clearly taken out here. There was no interest for us to take this. This, more so at this point in time, is a pattern trade than it is anything else, in my opinion. This was not. This was, because again, you have liquidity sitting there. But with us taking out a good area of liquidity and actually getting our first opening range move, right, chat? Like we talk about. Utilizing the opening range move, we did not wait for that here, right? The opening range move had occurred here. This is when your opening range move happened after the New York open. We simply took a trade prior. So, just a bit bit of patience from us. Then, we ended up looking to flip our narrative to trade towards the downside. And after initially seeing a hard dump, especially with NQ being the weaker asset and looking for downside more, I looked for price to finally come down here and look to validate invalidate the hourly BPR. Here was the idea. After that sell that we had, after initially getting stopped out, in my head, okay, London high swept, and now we're seeing a good intraday sell. This could look to target overnight lows, which we eventually did. Here is the issue. We ended up taking a trade in price that was supremely choppy off the second take here. Very choppy. That's number one. Number two, we ended up taking confirmation off not proper confirmation, right? We ended up taking this trade right as the candle closes what? A tick or two below the gap go invert. If you guys know me, if you guys have watched the trend of our reviews, if you know how I trade, I look for conclusions. I look for good candle inversions. We do not do not end up doing that here. So, it was a sloppy day from my end. Um, execution execution's aspect, should have been a bit more aware. Um, cuz I feel like I like to think that our trading strategy is very simple when you bring it down to the T. And I just kind of messed up on the simplicity of it. So, it happens. This is good to show you guys that even a trader like myself, we still have off days. There's still going to be days where you're not going to be perfect, and it is what it is. Um, but yeah, could have definitely been a bit more patient. This trade, as soon as we took, instantly wanted to draw down and instantly hit uh our stop. I guess the unfortunate thing with this trade too as well is that we got top ticked where we had our stop being the swing high, came up, swapped that, and eventually came back down and actually ran our objectives in mind, but just a bit of an unfortunate entry. Um, and so yeah, that's that's pretty much that. Bit choppy. Eventually got like I said, we got the move, but could have definitely got a bit better. So, that's pretty much that. If there's one thing I want to learn and you guys learn from today, it's just make sure you stick to your system and you stick to your executions. When it's really there and once you're dialed in, execute. If not, make sure you stay dialed. If you're not dialed, don't trade at all. Simple as that. So, um with that being said, hopefully you guys enjoyed the review. I'm going to catch you guys in the next one. Peace out.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/42cw8do-POs" }, { "id": "sy2pF5eXTcE", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$120,000 Day Trading in 1 Hour!", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sy2pF5eXTcE", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 15, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 3.2, "shared_a_plus_score": 9.8, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 2672, "duration_seconds": 698, "chart_count": 17, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 82.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 123.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 164.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 205.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 246.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 287.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 328.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 369.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 410.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 451.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 492.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 533.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_14.png" }, { "file": "chart_15.png", "t_sec": 574.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_15.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_15.png" }, { "file": "chart_16.png", "t_sec": 615.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_16.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_16.png" }, { "file": "chart_17.png", "t_sec": 656.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_17.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/sy2pF5eXTcE/chart_17.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "sy2pF5eXTcE", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$120,000 Day Trading in 1 Hour!", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sy2pF5eXTcE", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 698, "view_count": 2672, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 13185, "transcript_path": "sy2pF5eXTcE/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 82.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 123.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 164.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 205.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 246.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 287.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 328.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 369.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 410.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 451.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 492.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 533.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_15.png", "t_sec": 574.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_16.png", "t_sec": 615.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_17.png", "t_sec": 656.5 } ], "chart_count": 17, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "orm", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "fair value gap", "sweep", "bias", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "making", "scalp", "nq", "es", "execution" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 3.2, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "invalidation" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 9.8, "keyword_hits": [ "fair value gap", "bias", "confirmation", "london", "new york", "invalidation", "invalidate" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:46 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm up over $120,000 in a trading day, and this right here is the exact take I took. It was a 1-minute bearish BPR violation. But, before we go into this trade, let's talk about our bias. Let's talk about our execution, and let's talk about what made me think and going long where I did. So, bias. Coming into the open, today was a pretty hard day off the open. Um in terms of gauging bias through higher time frame, pretty difficult because if you look at recency price, it's been very up and down, very consolidative in terms of price action where we just have not done much. On the hourly time frame here specifically, we're just trading up and down, and we're not seeing much of movement at all. But, what we're able to gauge obviously with our components is we have three components in identifying my bias. If you haven't seen my YouTube video on exactly how I talk about that, go ahead and watch that video after this. Um but, with this here specifically on the hourly time frame for today's example, again, very tough. Same thing with the 4-hour time frame. Same thing with the daily time time frame. Not much to operate. But, for me, what I simply did is, you know, although we didn't have a clear higher time frame look, I used the other two components, which was overnight price and the opening range move. Well, if you go down here and you look at our overnight price, we end up seeing price essentially create a bullish sequence, quite of a slow one, but we see a bullish open through Asia, and then we see continuation onwards for the most part coming into New York open. What does New York open do? Well, we essentially see price off the open create a bullish opening range move. Now, NQ off the open ends up coming down here, and we end up taking out this London low, which we then sweep up and come back off of, right? That is a bullish sequence. But, what ES ends up doing here off the open is ES actually ends up creating a higher low, which also creates bullish SMT. ES created a bullish SMT by creating a higher low here, whilst NQ created a lower low past that London low. So, bullish SMT paired up with the overnight sequence trading for the most part bullish, and then you end up seeing the opening range move trade bullish. My bias was sitting higher naturally. Now, this at this point in time, my higher time frame outlook wasn't still very clear, but I like the idea behind higher price because the fact that price off the opening range move was bullish, price off overnight price was bullish. Now, after seeing price trade the way it did off the open, I wasn't necessarily too entertained in trading upside yet, although I had two out of three components. I specifically more so wanted higher time frames to clear up a bit. I talked about I talked about that today on my live stream. First piece I end up posting out for today is I said open bullish SMT wiped or this is after, excuse me, um our bullish SMT got wiped. Um open bullish SMT got wiped and Q leading the sell, ES lagging the reaction. Under the low and low for ES will determine what we do. In Gulf past, I expect NQ to run Asia lows reverse. I expect a move back into its range. So, essentially, looking at price here after the open that we had and having the bias that I had, right? Again, it wasn't A plus because we didn't have a clear higher time frame look. However, we did have the other two components swaying towards upside. We end up seeing price essentially come back down here and we see a tremendous sell, which was obviously significantly more than what the buy sequence was. So, at this point in time, I'm like, \"Okay, I have an unclear picture on price because at this point, I'm bullish, but price is printing bearish.\" So, for me, I'm telling chat, I'm on live, I'm like, \"Okay, yo chat, if if we we see price trade past this on a low, we most likely engulf into Asia into Asia lows for NQ.\" And I said that knowing that price is most likely to do that even though I had a bullish picture in my mind earlier on. And I think this is important for you guys watching this video and for traders watching this video that even Lento, even the best traders in the world that are way better than me, you have your moments where sometimes the charts don't make sense. And I think it's completely normal to think, you know, that it's fine that you know, when when whenever that happens because I said this a couple minutes ago before I started up the review, but as, you know, the great thing about scalpers, the great thing about the system that I follow is I only need to know what the markets want to do or are going to do or try to predict it when I need to put risk on. And when I put risk on, it's simply following my model and when my all my components line up. Were our components lined up here? No. We had a bias, but price wasn't trading well and we never had an entry model. So, for me, bull bias coming down here, what I wanted to see price essentially do is actually come down here and sell into this Asia low on NQ. One of the pieces I had past my first initial piece that I posted on Discord, um right, especially with this being here. And gold past, I expect NQ to run Asia lows, reverse. I expect uh for price to move back into range. So, with this here specifically, what I was mainly was saying here is that we had bullish SMT through ES and NQ. And for price to come down and wipe out that SMT, tells you that price what? Potentially wants to trade lower. Now, Lento, why do you think NQ was going to hit Asia lows? Why not ES also hit Asia lows? Well, that's because NQ was actually leading the sell. And you could get a good gauge by that because you could tell you could look at exactly when price took out the low on London lows through NQ and then when ES did. And you could see that obviously clearly off the open, NQ ends up taking out the London low off the direct open. But ES does not end up taking out its London low all the way down until 10:10, so about 40 Excuse me. Yeah, about 40 minutes after the open, we don't end up seeing ES act into its low until NQ sees a tremendous sell. What you could also see is when we did see the bearish SMT invalidation the bullish SMT invalidation, look at the New York lows that we had set in place. NQ ends up taking out its New York low specifically right here at around 10:00 sharp. ES does not end up taking out its New York low of day until 10:00 right here. Until 10:06 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. So, ES does not trade past its New York low day until 6 minutes after NQ did. So, that's how you can get you're able to get a gauge behind price and get a gauge behind which asset is stronger, which asset is the weaker sell. And you see price come down here and you see a tremendous sell through NQ. And all I pretty much said in this comp piece is I said, \"Okay, we invalidated bullish sentiment. If we see price trade past London lows on ES, expect Asia lows.\" knowing that NQ was obviously the weaker asset. We actually come down here and we see price take out Asia lows. This is still with me not having a major clear bias. Then we end up seeing price sweep the low and recognizing that ES was the leading asset at this time, we actually ideally wanted to look for a potential long in play after seeing price flip back to being bullish into that bullish bias. We see price sell off tremendously and we see NQ put in almost a perfect low by sweeping its Asia low almost to the tick and seeing a move back up. And recognizing the hourly time frame, but one thing you could get through the hourly time frame here is that you could see that the sentiment in terms of the market has been very range bound, right? Price has been very up and down. So, for me in my head I said, \"Okay, great sell here, but what's the probability we see continuation today on a Monday, right?\" Not that likely. The likelihood of us seeing a move back up and a trade back into range was likely. And so, from there, with that recognition through sentiment on the hourly time frame, with this recognition through the Asia sweep off the low, what I wanted to see price do was simply flip back up here and violate the bearish sequence that we had back down, aka violating bearish PD arrays. We end up seeing that happen and with us recognizing earlier on that NQ was the weaker asset, we then wanted to go long and go long on the leading asset, which was ES. And the first idea that I had in mind was a 5-minute gap, which went invert, that I wanted to see price come down and retrace into and retest that 5-minute gap alongside this 1-minute bullish gap. Wanted to see price come tap and see a beautiful confirmation sequence confirming back up and then heading higher. Um, Um we unfortunately do not end up getting that trade because price just went off the get-go. The moment we inverted, we saw price just go higher and higher, but we stood poised and we stood chill. And eventually we had a second idea, which was the idea behind two 5-minute gaps where we wanted to see price rebound rebalance, again being patient, and then going off there. We eventually end up seeing price come down here. And we see price retest the gap. What do we eventually do? Confirm where we take entry at the confirmation sequence right here, being the closure back above the gap. We want break-even stops at this 5-minute gap CE, right the midpoint, and then we simply uh let the trade go from there. But the unfortunate thing actually behind this take, right when we took this trade on ES, was that ES and NQ had a divergence flip mid-trade. And you could see that based upon the fact that NQ at that point in time, after initially bouncing back up, NQ was trading past swing high and holding consistently. But if you look at ES here, you were seeing ES consistently not hold because you were trading underneath that swing high. So it was a bit of frustrating. We eventually end up going break-even stops, and this trade closes out for a break-even, which was a bit annoying because we we had our bull bias, we had our components in, and had we simply taken on NQ, this trade would have panned out first try. From there, we sat still, and we simply waited for price to clear up again after initial consolidation. Then we eventually end up seeing a good second trade entry, which was the entry I showed you at the beginning of the review, which was a potential long run play. NQ hourly internal high still not taking. Right above, we have a CE of an hourly gap. That would be target. Stop right at low. Idea is bullish gap rebalance confirm, and then jab long. If we come back down, violate the gap, create a momentary bearish gap, then come back up, then invert that creating or invert that creating a bullish IFG, I like it even better. 1-minute bearish BPR invalidation. This is essentially what it was. So we had a bullish fair value gap, which I initially just looked for price to bounce off and see higher. We did not end up doing that. We instead come down here and we violate that gap creating a bearish inversion alongside a bearish fair value gap. Now, in my head I was like, \"Okay, this is somewhat bearish, but really if we come back up and we see a violation of this somewhat bearish gap, and we see price reclaim above the gap, now we have these two gaps which were bearish gaps and balanced price range in the same zone get violated, right? So, that a lot today. And that's exactly what I was looking for. Stop route of low, closure above violating that bearish BPR, which gives you bullish sentiment in price. Our target of interest for this trade was the hourly gap CE after our initial ultimate draw, which was the hourly internal high. We eventually say I am long taken on live, and then we eventually see price build up nicely off this NQ position, where I then go risk-free once high of day is taken out. TP1 interest eventually gets taken, where we see price gets smashed for a 1.5 R. From there, we simply trail stops continuously, and we eventually get trailed out for this trade at about a 2.7 R. This is our trail stop right here, and we eventually get trailed out there right around here before the market close, where we then see price um essentially just consolidate coming into the close. So, what did we do today? We stood patient. We initially had a bull bias. We then saw a tremendous sell-off the open, and we were confused. We didn't know what price wanted to do, but the most important thing is we stood still, stood patient. Then we saw price sweep overnight lows. We saw a beautiful move back up recognizing the hourly time frame, recognizing the sweep of the low, bullish sentiment. We then saw price follow up on that by showcasing consistent displacement violating this bearish sequence. And then we we eventually get two trades, first one going break even due to the divergence flip between NQ and ES mid-trade. Then we take the second trade on NQ recognizing that NQ was a leading asset now, went long and saw a beautiful return on investment here for about a 2.7 R resulting in to be $120,000 on the trade day. That's pretty much it. Hopefully you guys enjoyed the review. Catch you guys in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/sy2pF5eXTcE" }, { "id": "8b2vUNIThpE", "content_type": "video", "title": "Losing -$73,000 Yesterday, Then Making +$131,000 Today! (Day Trading)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8b2vUNIThpE", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 16, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 6.3, "shared_a_plus_score": 9.8, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1886, "duration_seconds": 714, "chart_count": 17, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 42.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 84.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 126.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 168.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 210.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 252.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 294.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 336.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 378.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 420.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 462.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 504.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 546.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_14.png" }, { "file": "chart_15.png", "t_sec": 588.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_15.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_15.png" }, { "file": "chart_16.png", "t_sec": 630.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_16.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_16.png" }, { "file": "chart_17.png", "t_sec": 672.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_17.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/8b2vUNIThpE/chart_17.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "8b2vUNIThpE", "content_type": "video", "title": "Losing -$73,000 Yesterday, Then Making +$131,000 Today! (Day Trading)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8b2vUNIThpE", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 714, "view_count": 1886, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 14345, "transcript_path": "8b2vUNIThpE/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 42.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 84.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 126.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 168.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 210.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 252.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 294.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 336.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 378.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 420.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 462.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 504.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 546.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_15.png", "t_sec": 588.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_16.png", "t_sec": 630.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_17.png", "t_sec": 672.3 } ], "chart_count": 17, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "orm", "short", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "take profit", "liquidity", "sweep", "bias" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "p&l", "profit", "loss", "making", "losing", "session", "nq", "es", "execution" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 6.3, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "risk management", "stop loss" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 9.8, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:43 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today I'm up over $130,000 day trading live. And this was the trade that I took to make me over $130,000. But before we get into this trade and the day, let's talk about yesterday. Yesterday was a bad day for me. I took three losses and lost a good amount of money. But this trade here specifically made back all my losses and more. Lento, you were one for four in the last two days. How is that possible? How could you close out green? Well, let's get into it real quick before if you guys recognize the background. It's different. I'm visiting family and I'm here for a little bit. So excited about that. In terms of our trading, yesterday was a hard day. Not only through the charts, but through my execution. I felt I traded pretty piss poor yesterday. Did a bad job. Took three losses, which I broke my rule already because I have a rule of thumb where if I go over two, I call the day. Did not decide to call it. The great thing with yesterday, the only upside was that it was a halfhour day, which if you don't know what that means, essentially Mondays and Fridays I risk half my size as I do to Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursdays. The reason I do that is because statistically through the course of my career, my best performance days are Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday. Mondays and Fridays I don't perform the best. And yesterday was a good good example of that. In terms of yesterday, well, we came into the open with a pretty bullish bias. Referencing NQ, we ended up coming into the open with a bullish bias due to the opening range move alongside the higher time frame. Look on the hourly time frame looking at price coming into yesterday. We had seen a good move through price where we had taken out a significant low in this hourly wick low on ENQ last Friday. And so what I was looking for price to do coming into New York open was continue that sentiment. Well, two main components when it comes to identifying reversals, right? comes to making sure that a low that was taken out is a good area of low in terms of significance and the displacement that we get back up is a good displaceive sequence. We see price do that, right? Coming into yesterday's open, we see price essentially on Friday take out a significant area of liquidity. And what do you see price do through price uh through overnight sessions coming into yesterday? Well, you see price pick up and you see price continue on forward to what we were doing um earlier on. And so for me coming into the open, as long as we got a bullish opening range move sequence, my interest was potentially going long. Now, two of the three trades that we ended up taking were longs. One out of three were shorts and all three trades got stopped out. The very first trade here, the idea behind this trade was a entry where we ended up taking after liquidity got swept through our New York low of day. It was simply put a one minute gap or one minute break structure where we wanted to see price come up here and engulf past this one minute wick high breaking this lower high sequence and seeing price trade back up. My stop loss on this trade was this one minute wick low. Now, here's the thing about yesterday referencing now the funny things. I went back and I journaled yesterday, but after realizing, you know, today and having the type of trading day that we had, I could easily go back and go back to yesterday and say this is probably one of my worst performing days of the year, not P&L wise because it was a half hour day, but it was one of my worst performing days because of the fact that I took trades that I would never need usually take. So for instance, for this trade, the reason this trade was so awful was because of the fact that typically within my system, what I do is I require displacement and I required a good gap for entry. We did not have a gap here, nor did we have the best displacement. Did we come up here? Did we see a break of this lower high pattern? Yes. But a break of a lower high pattern, is it the most bullish indication or for this instance not even worth enough taking a trade? Yet, we still did. We took this trade here with the expectation of price potentially drawing back up into New York highs. I think more so what I was too interested in here was with my bullish bias. Um on top of that New York swap low. So I was still interested in the fact that we could see price draw higher. However, you guys know me when it comes to our views and identifying and taking good trades. Whenever we take an area of liquidity, we want to see price go immediately. We did not see that happen here. We saw price retrace and we saw price meet back down lower. However, we structured out and for some reason, for some instance, I found interest in partaking longs here. Um even though price was not trading the best. Um, and so specifically with price here, just a bad trade overall. This was the second trade that we ended up taking. It was a one minute gap, go invert. The idea here, the consensus was going short after initially getting stopped out off this long recognition that was price could potentially draw lower. Again, another sloppy trade here where typically I look for good displacement coming into entries and we did not get that here. We were more so looking to take a short off a higher low sequence that was created off the low of day. This is just not the best type of entry that would have. I will say the stop implements or the stop placements for these trades that we ended up having yesterday were not the worst. The bad part was the entry. The entry should have never been taken here. And specifically with this trade, we don't see the worst confirmation sequence coming back down. But again, we ended up creating a higher low. So you see me take a long here off one instance of a lower high being broken. And then you see me take a short here off one instance of a of of um what you want to call it, a lower high formation, if that makes sense. We had a lower high here that we ended up forming. And you see me find interest in taking a short whilst we ended up creating a higher low. Again, just very unlike me. When I look for trades, I look for clear components. I look for a very one-sided confluence in price. This was not the case. You see me end up taking a short and the short did not pan out the best. The third and final trade for yesterday's trading session was a one minute gap go long. Now, this one was the worst trade out of all despite us getting trumped or getting stopped out by this Trump candle. The most frustrating aspect of this trade was I I did not we wait for clear-cut confirmation. The easiest part to my system is waiting for confirmation. We do not end up waiting for that completely yesterday. What I end up seeing price do is come down this gap gets rebalanced. We see one candle to splice back up and not a candle that we're looking for price to engulf up. A simple candle where we come up here and seek a closure over and I instantly take that trade. If you guys know me with confirmation, especially on retraces into gaps, what I want to see price do is confirm well off the gap. You want to see price displace equally or even better off the retracement and the speed that we came back down. We did not happen that have that here, right? When this candle closed, we were still on this one minute structure, right? This one minute wick that we ended up forming was one minute structure that we had. And you see we just had a small move back up and that caused me to take this trade. This tells me right here that I was just sloppy yesterday. That just that's what that tells me because I've been trading the system for years. This trade that I had yesterday was pure slop from me. And my expectation for this trade was after seeing price put in the low that it did and seeking displacement back up. I was expecting continuation and higher. Now this with yesterday was a combination of price and more so my execution. I'm at fault here, right? I took these trades. A good trader in these conditions or any type of conditions is rec, you know, recognizes it and and adjusts for what it is. I took a I took three bad trades yesterday. But again, the great thing is if you're in the Discord and you know the sizing plan right here, you go down to sizing. Um, in the Discord, you know exactly what our sizing and what our risk is per day. Yesterday happened to be a half hour day, which means coming into today, we are one Risk. Journal that, reflected on that, simply moved on and realized that I took too many trades in bad conditions and I just poorly executed. Came in today was a lot clearer of a look. Now coming into the open, the difference between yesterday and today starting off was that yesterday was more so we put in a low and we put we saw a move. That's purely what my entire bias came off. I looked for I looked at two things and I was like, \"Okay, I'm bullish.\" We saw a low get taken. We saw a bit of displacement and I instantly assumed that we would see price drop higher. Now, when it came into today, we had definitive definitive bullish buys. Let me explain. You guys know we have YouTube videos on this as well alongside more detailed education in the discord. What I look for when it comes to bias is I look at three components. Higher time frame, overnight opening range move. Well, strictly with overnight price, if you just purely look at that for what Asia traded last night, what we end up doing for our low of day on Asia, this low that we end up sweeping and coming back up off of is a low that we installed through yesterday's Asia low. So, first things first, overnight price is clear already because we see price come down and the low that we put into the session. The actual MSS that we get was a uh very clear MSS. That is a similar component that we got to yesterday. But here's what we have more of today. A you have much more displacement coming back up. So, a great thing with price, especially when it's displaced like this, is it's a good indication that price most likely wants to do what? Trade higher. And so, we see price essentially come up here and we see a reversal in the market for a potential look and continuation. So for me specifically, price tells you that it has interest in potentially drawing up higher. It has interest in seeking higher arrays um and violating cons consistent bearish PD rays. What we also see here coming into the open is we have a definitive area of draw. Yesterday's trades, if you guys go back to yesterday and the trades that we ended up taking, our highs were purely put off high of day. Not the worst, but we have a definitive area of draw being this previous day high. And you have a definitive area of draw of this daily gap on NQ for ES precisely. You have previous or you have these equal set of highs on um um on price right here which we have two sets of equal highs right one where London created through Asia or excuse me one where we created one through London uh where we tapped the Asia high equal high and then one right before or right into New York where we see price essentially come up we see price set another form of equal high. So two sets of equal highs here that we end up seeing price come up here and putting in place. So we have clear area of buy side. On top of that, we have much more displacement coming into today's open. So you have a lot more data showcasing to you that already that oh, we're seeing movement towards the upside. We're seeing good movement. So what I did here for the New York opening range move to in order to confirm our entry was I wanted to see a clear low in the overnight low get taken. And instead of waiting and being okay with seeing price draw lower first, I wanted to see price sweep the low and sweep it fast, right? And so what you end up seeing again through yesterday's trade coming into the open is our first long was a long taken after initially taking out our New York lows and then seeing price essentially consolidate. Then we took a long when we didn't even see any true displacement off the low. What I wanted to see here, what was a non-negotiable for me specifically off the New York opening range was if you were to come down and run London lows, I wanted to see price take that low out and take it shoot back up, right? Trade right back up. And that's what you exactly see price do. And we end up entering a long here. The idea behind this long was an ES one minute BPR rebalance. We ended up seeing price initially come up here and invert this one minute bearish gap which turned into a bullish inversion for value gap. On top of that, in the moment of us displacing and inverting past it, we created a one minute bullish BPR. And so what we ended up looking to do was looking to ride higher price off it. Right? And again, you have more of a definitive bias through your overnight sequence through the low that we end up putting in through Asia. And most importantly, definitive buyside targets and a definitive opening range move. You see the low get taken out. You don't see any rambling. You you don't see price stutter. You don't see price consolidate. You see price almost immediately come right back up after putting in that low and see price draw higher. We take the trade, go risk-f free, take profit one is based off our equal highs that we set in place, a definitive area of draw. And then we end up seeing price come up here and essentially hit our our take-profit two in the PDH. PDH ends up realizing at about a 2.7R. We do trail our stops and get wicked out right here, which realizes our day for a plus 2.1R. But you can see off yesterday's three losses, which equaled a minus 1.5R because each trade was a half take. This trade right here being a 2.1R ends up being more than the losses yesterday combined and puts you back green. So this is the the importance of risk management and why I appreciate this so much. If you install proper risk management and you trade your system properly, you could always get out get out of any funk. Um and so it it's fractal. It on a day-to-day basis, on a week to week basis, on a month-to-month basis, you could always get back utilizing proper risk management and you know consistently believing in your system. So, that's pretty much that. That's the review. Hope you guys enjoyed it.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/8b2vUNIThpE" }, { "id": "1Y_dsrZpQ-s", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$130,000 Day Trading With 1 Trade! (PROOF)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Y_dsrZpQ-s", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 17, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 4.8, "shared_a_plus_score": 9.8, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1463, "duration_seconds": 574, "chart_count": 14, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 82.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 123.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 164.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 205.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 246.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 287.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 328.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 369.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 410.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 451.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 492.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 533.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/1Y_dsrZpQ-s/chart_14.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "1Y_dsrZpQ-s", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$130,000 Day Trading With 1 Trade! (PROOF)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Y_dsrZpQ-s", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 574, "view_count": 1463, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 10932, "transcript_path": "1Y_dsrZpQ-s/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 82.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 123.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 164.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 205.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 246.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 287.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 328.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 369.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 410.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 451.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 492.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 533.1 } ], "chart_count": 14, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "orm", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "take profit", "fair value gap", "bias", "setup", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "loss", "making", "losing", "session", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 4.8, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "drawdown", "stop loss" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 9.8, "keyword_hits": [ "fair value gap", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york", "invalidate" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:40 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm up over $130,000 day trading live and here is the performance card via Trade Copia. A beautiful day across all my prop accounts and today was a perfect example of what it means to take stick to your system throughout any course of any period. If you guys recall back to a couple weeks ago, we had a period where we were in drawdown and it sucked, right? Obviously, being in drawdown isn't fun. It's not something you'd like to do as a trader. But we stuck through our system and today, you know, alone, not including yesterday, not including this week, not including last week, not including the week before, today alone mitigated almost, you know, the entire drawdown period that we were in, um, completely. And this was the trade that caused it, right? We were up at peak, I believe, a 9.8 R, but the trade realizes at a 7.2 R, right? That's because you see me mention at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time is when I will close that trade. 4:00 p.m. candle open was about a 7.2 R, but before we talk about the trade, let's talk about how we got here. Talk about my buys, talk about what precisely caused me to take this trade and make me over $130,000. Well, let's get into it. So, starting off coming into the morning, I ended up coming into the live at around 11:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. Typically, through our schedule, we're live at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Standard Time every single day, live trading. And what we specifically just ended up coming up coming into the open expecting a bit of chop just because of how productive we were overnight. Usually, historically, and what we've seen as of recent is every time we've seen an overnight session trade well or sequence happen, we've seen New York tend to usually slow down a bit. Well, that wasn't the instance for today. I did end up missing a good chunk of the morning pump, but however, price was very directional today and we were able to capitalize in a very good trade. Now, through our 11:00 a.m. open or 11:00 a.m. session where we started trading live, this is the point in time right here, 11:00 a.m. For me, I was still very much so in the interest of higher price. I think bright or I think bias is pretty clear here because with our three instances or three components when it comes to identifying bias through higher time frame, through overnight price session, and through the opening range move, every instance was extremely bullish. Higher time frame on the hourly time frame, on the 4-hour time frame, on the daily time frame, whatever you want to mark it, you see consistent engulfing candles towards the upside off our open through last night Asia. Coming into the London session and coming into the New York, we traded bullish completely all the way through overnight price, and most importantly through the New York opening range move, which is your open move into an overnight session higher low. We instantly pop into our London highs, and we see price immediately engulf past that. So, if it not if that's not the most bullish indication of um price to come towards the upside, I don't know what it is. Every higher higher time frame looked bullish. All sessions through overnight looked bullish, and um our New York opening range move looked really bullish as well. So, coming into the session here, right, not even having a draw level in mind, I was pretty much keen on upside because of how clear it was. Now, what we wanted to do and go ahead and do is mark out some levels. So, on the hourly time frame we zoomed out, we had a couple levels here, an internal high here, internal high here, internal high here as well. And what we ended up deciding to do was stay the course and play the sentiment towards trend. Now, I said this on the live stream today, you could have the right bias, bias could be A+, but your if your timing is not there, you will not catch a good trade. So, although we popped on at 11:00 a.m., and although bias was A+ and very much so clear, what we wanted to do was remain patient because if you're not patient and you don't wait for your entry criteria, you could easily still get stopped out in conditions that are very clear for your bias. Let me say that again. You could have a long bias per se for today, and it could be A plus and as clear as it was today through our three components in identifying that, but if you don't have a clear entry model, a clear way of entering the market, you could have a very bad time trade and it could still invalidate your stop loss while still validating your long bias, right? So, all we did here was precisely wait and although we did see a bullish, you know, open and we could have easily blindly took long here, we did not. We simply waited for the opportunity for us to capitalize in a good trade and here it eventually came. This trade here, the two components or the main component with this trade here was I used two 1-minute gaps to mark out two 1-minute bullish fair value gaps, which did happen to come back down here. It did happen to get violated, but what we then see price do is immediately come right back up and we see price violate this 2-minute bearish inversion fair value gap pattern. So, what's that? What do you mean? Well, as you guys know, these two 1-minute gaps, they were initially bullish. I was coming down here and closing under means they violate them. So, we do have a bearish sequence here, but then what do we see price do? We see price come right back up in a much more displacive way. We see price within 2 to 3 minutes come back up and violate these two now two 1-minute of bearish inversion fair value gaps and we see price come back up and for me that was equally as good as a rebalance in mind because we ended up creating a higher low. We ended up seeing the 5-minute time frame rebalance and we ended up seeing price come right back up. Draw instances where I marked out. We had the internal highs 29686, 29749 were initial take profit targets and you could see me mention that in here, right? Very clear, very easy to follow along. You see me mention the fact idea potential long and play. Combining two two 1-minute gaps. Idea is we draw higher into 29749. Break even stops with a closure above high of day. So, essentially we wanted to go risk on through the closure and confirmation and go risk-free once we saw a candle closure above these highs. A pretty tight high of day or a pretty tight break even stop, but you guys have to remember you still want to be risk appropriate here. Although we took a very good entry, you want to make sure your risk is in, you know, check and I think the high of day break even was clear because in the case we saw price close overnight sleep above above high of day and came back down into entry. The likelihood of us wanting to retrace down lower was there, right? So what I mean by that is chat this necessarily doesn't have to be the most bearish thing, right? If you were to see price come up here off entry, take out highs and come back down immediately, that's not necessarily me saying, \"Yeah, I think we're you know, going to see downside reversal back down lower.\" That's me more so saying, \"Let's take risk off because in the case we do want to retrace lower, you know, say past this relative low, we avoid the potential of getting stopped out and taking a loss and having the potential in waiting for a deeper retrace before taking longs back up higher.\" So that was the instance for today. We managed to end up confirming and anticipating our entry a bit early where we end up taking this trade at there, you know, you see me mention I am long right at the closure and we end up taking this trade and it immediately goes. The very next candle, if you're on live, you had a perfect fill, um, you know, through our model entry. We see price immediately shoot back up, go break even within the next 1-minute candle, which is really nice to see and we eventually see take profit one get hit in this London high. Then we end up seeing price, you know, kind of consolidate for a bit where we then eventually met up met higher price and we went all the way through. So from TP1 onwards, it was simply continuation and the best way to manage your trade from TP1 onwards is to simply trail and trail effectively. If you guys don't know how I trail in the room and how I trail through my system, I always do two ways. I either do previous take profit levels or previous areas of interest that we go based off in the case we never see retracements, but fortunately for today we do end up seeing retracements. Therefore, we're using our we use our second way, which is basing off the second most relative second most recent relative high or relative low for a bullish setup. So, what I mean by that is say for example, we come up here and we see price showcase, you know, a new high right here. From this high, we trail our stops to the second most relative low, which this would be the most recent. This would be the your most second recent. So, trail stops here, and you can see me vividly mention that right here. Boom, 29695. And then from there on out, as you create a new highs, we just kept trailing and trailing and trailing, where we eventually held this trade all the way into the closure of New York, realizing this trade at a 7.2R at the 4:00 p.m. um candle closure. So, um a beautiful day, a beautiful trade, and we happen to take NQ because NQ was the leading asset. Stop placement on this trade here was based off a 1-minute wick low. I thought stop on this trade here was pretty good, and we saw a good ROI off it. Today's markets were just completely pumping, and this is me This is what happens, chat, when you just completely follow your system. And, you know, you see that today's trade alone wipes out the bulk, if not all of your drawdown that you experienced through the other period that we have in a period that we had in here. And that's what I keep on saying time and time again >> [clears throat] >> because although drawdown sucks, obviously, it always sucks. You never want to lose money, right? You never want to come into the market, put in a lot of time, and lose money, obviously, but it happens, right? It happens through trading. What's most important is those periods of drawdown that you completely continue to follow your system, and the periods where price is good, you follow your system as well, day in and day out, and you see the return on investment on today alone, not mentioning yesterday, not mentioning the 4-day win streak we're on, not mentioning the 3-week we're on pace pretty much. This week we're going to close out green regardless of anything. So, this week, last week, the previous week before, we've been green all 3 weeks, and just absolutely cooking up, and you're seeing why. So, a beautiful day overall. That being that, hopefully you guys have enjoyed the enjoyed this review. I'm going to catch you guys in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/1Y_dsrZpQ-s" }, { "id": "iSwj-o3-aWE", "content_type": "video", "title": "Trading Is Hard Until You Build A System Like This", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSwj-o3-aWE", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 18, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 8.0, "shared_a_plus_score": 8.4, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 18294, "duration_seconds": 586, "chart_count": 14, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 83.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 125.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 167.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 209.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 251.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 293.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 335.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 376.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 418.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 460.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 502.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 544.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/iSwj-o3-aWE/chart_14.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "iSwj-o3-aWE", "content_type": "video", "title": "Trading Is Hard Until You Build A System Like This", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSwj-o3-aWE", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 586, "view_count": 18294, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 13479, "transcript_path": "iSwj-o3-aWE/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 83.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 125.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 167.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 209.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 251.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 293.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 335.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 376.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 418.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 460.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 502.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 544.3 } ], "chart_count": 14, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "orm", "long", "stop", "target", "fair value gap", "liquidity", "bias", "setup", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "p&l", "loss", "making", "losing", "session", "nq", "es", "execution" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 8.0, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "invalidation", "psychology", "revenge", "fomo" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 8.4, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "fair value gap", "bias", "session", "invalidation" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:49 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "What if I told you the reason trading feels so hard is not because you need a new strategy, not because you need a new indicator, or not because you need a new concept. It's because you do not have a system that controls your decision-making before your emotions get involved. Most traders are not losing because they don't know anything. They're losing because once the markets open, they start making emotional decisions over systematical ones. They chase, they revenge trade, they hesitate, they over trade, and hence they break their rules. Then they blame the strategy and go looking for a new one. But the real problem was never just the strategy. It was lack of system because trading is based off decisions, not hours put in. Remember, smart work over hard work. You can sit on the charts all day, put in as many hours as you want, but the moment you become emotional and let those emotions win, you lose. This is what I struggled with early on. It was greed that was the main killer for me. I just felt like I needed to make money every single day. The moment I would come into the market, I would have that instant pressure put on myself to do that, which makes trading a whole lot worse. That pressure you instill in your mindset causes you to think different, which allows your decisions to be different, which is everything in trading. So in this video, I'm going to present to you a five-step process that will take you from trading in chaos all the way trading with a proper system. It doesn't matter if you trade ICT, it doesn't matter if you trade supply and demand, it doesn't matter if you trade the opening range move. This system I'm about to show you guys is here to make your decisions a lot more simple. Let's get into it. Step one is clarity. Before you wake up and go on the charts, you got to make sure your mental is right. A lot of traders come in not with the right mindset, take a trade, and solely blame it on the trading strategy. When most times, it's before you even start trading that messed you up. Maybe you're frustrated. Maybe you woke up tired. Maybe you went online and saw someone make a ton of money, and now you feel behind. Maybe you're comparing yourself, taking that what you saw coming into today, and thinking you need to make more money. And now without even realizing it, your mentality through your trading has completely shifted. Now you are no longer trading off your system. Your decisions are being made off frustration, off competition, and from greed. You are trading the need to make something happen. So before I start trading today, always ask myself, am I feeling mentally sharp? Am I ready to go? And can I conquer today with the trading mentality? Or truthfully, do I feel emotional? Do I feel tired? Do I feel desperate and feel the need to make money now? Because if I feel sharp, I can attack the day. Sometimes, taking the trading day off is the best trade you could take. The simple act of writing down a problem is often 50% of the solution. It forces clarity. And that is how I look at journaling. I sit down, I'm not trying to overcomplicate my trading, simply write down what is in my head. Therefore, I can look at it, attack it, and get some clarity out of it. For me, the first part of my journaling is raw. How's my day? How am I feeling? Did anything outside of my trading affect me? Did I come into the session sharp, or was something already off? A lot of times, you guys won't even know you're off until you journal and really reflect on it. You could come into the day with the right mindset, but essentially see someone make a ton of money, and assume that you need to do the same thing and speed up your process. That causes greed, that causes P&L fixation, and that causes you to take trades that you don't need to be taking. So, the journal is here to catch that, not after you blow the day, before. Keep it raw. And once you do that, you're on to step number two, the execution rule. This is where you define what a good trading day actually is like. Most traders come in, and they assume they have a good day if they make money. That's not the case. What's the case is following your system. That's it. If you see a trade present within your system, take the trade. >> [laughter] >> If you see the trade present in your system, take the trade. If you don't, simply do not. Make a plan, come in, and follow it every single day. Because P&L's not the plan, P&L's the result of following and breaking your rules over time. If your plan says you need a higher time frame outlook before you take a trade, you need a higher time frame outlook. If your plan says you need an entry model before you take a trade, you need an entry [music] model. It's as simple as that. The goal is not to come in and find action. The goal is to come in and execute a plan. Because when you start trading based on I need to make money today, because the moment you allow that to happen, that's when greed takes over, that's when your emotions take over, and that's when you start making bad decisions and start chasing. This is when you break the same rule you wrote down before the session. A one might be taking a trade within my system. A one might be not taking a trade without my system. Or, a one might be taking a trade hitting my TP and then closing off the platform. That is how you start rewiring your behavior. At first, you have to force it. Your brain's going to want trades. >> [music] >> Your brain's going to want to break those rules cuz it's so used to it. But a rule removes those decisions from the heat of the moment. It tells you this is what I trade, this is when I trade, and this is when I stop. So the question is simple. Did I make the most money possible? Did I catch every move? But did I follow my system? That's the execution rule. Step three, know when to stop. Because every trader has off days, just like athletes. You're not going to come in the market execute perfectly every day. You're not going to come in the market and read everything perfectly every single day. So you need a rule that protects you when you're not at your best. So for me, over two and I'm off. I don't sit there trying to make it back. I don't convince myself to take another trade, but simply get off and journal it. Reflect, recoup, and move on to the next. Because most times the loss isn't even the problem. It's what happens after the loss. One loss could have turned into revenge trading. One miss entry could turn into chasing, FOMOing. One red day could turn you into breaking every rule you had. And that is what causes real damage to traders. It's usually just not one bad trade to be honest. It's the decisions that come after that bad trade. So if you hit your loss limit, you're done. If you go over two, you're done. If your trade does not present, you're done. Not because you're scared, but because you're protecting your mental clarity for the next session and all your capital. And you're essentially making sure one bad day doesn't turn into anything worse. Once you have clarity, the execution rule, and the stop rule, you now have structure. But structure isn't good enough. Now you need proof. Step four is the proof system. This is where most traders skip the work. They learn a model, they see someone else trade it, and they want to risk money instantly. But seeing something work once is not proof. Forward testing it and back testing it is where you see it multiple times. There's no specific amount where the model suddenly becomes perfect. The more you see it, the more familiar it becomes. You start to understand it better. You start to see it better. You start to predict it better. You start to understand what conditions are clean. You start to understand what conditions are not. Most importantly, you understand what days to avoid. And if we're talking about the opening range move, this is where most traders need to be careful. They need to know how the opening range move actually works. ORM is the first movement to overnight liquidity. Most people understand that part, but the most important piece is higher time frame context. Without higher time frame, the opening range move is nothing. If you don't understand higher time frame, you're essentially just trading lower time frame. You can see the opening range move happen, you can see the displacement occur, you can see the reaction. But at the end of the day, if you don't see the bigger picture, you don't really know what we're trading into. So before you trust the model with real risk, you need proof. You need to know what the bias is, what the setup is, and what the entry is. You need to know the invalidation, you need to know the target, you need to know the risk, and you need to know the management. This is what turns a strategy into a system. Back test it, forward test it, watch it live, journal it, use small risk. See how it behaves across different conditions, because confidence shouldn't come from one screenshot. It should come from proof of concept. And once you have proof, losing no longer feels personal. It's just a part of the data. Without proof, every single loss makes you question everything. With proof, it's simply a trade and a system that you know. Which brings us to the final step. Step five is the psychology lock-in. But this is the domino. Most traders can learn how to read a chart, they can learn how to read liquidity, they can learn how to read fair value gaps. Being able to learn a model is one thing. Being able to follow that model for a long time is different. That's where most traders break. They know exactly what to do, they just don't want to do it. They know they should wait for higher time frame, they know they should wait for their entry model, they know they should wait for their risk to be respected. But in the moment, their personality takes over. Greed takes over. Impatience takes over. Comparison takes over. This is why the final step is not just locking into a model, it's locking into the type of trader you need to become in order to follow that model successfully. Because the model could be simple. The hard part is simply following it every single day. When you're bored, when you're red, when someone else is winning, that's the real test. That's why jumping from model to model, strategy to strategy, doesn't fix the issue. One week it's supply and demand, the next week it's ICT, then it's support and resistance, then it's order flow, then it's somebody else's Discord set up. And because you keep on trading your strategy over and over again, you never truly learn how a model operates, never truly learn the characteristics, and never truly learn what was your issue, execution or the system. You think you're learning by switching strategies, but in reality, you're just restarting. The goal is not to know every single model, it's to become dangerous with one. One model, one session, one bias, and one execution plan. That is how you build clarity. And if you're using the opening range move strategy, that means understanding the model, understanding higher time frame bias, and repeating that process over and over again until you know yourself inside out with that strategy. So, here's the challenge. For the next 30 days, lock into one model. Not five, not a new model after every single loss, one model. Break it down, write the rules. Journal before and after the session. Follow the execution rule, respect the stop rule. Collect proof, review the data, then repeat. In 30 days, you'll start seeing a pattern. Not just in the markets, but in yourself. You'll see when greed shows up, you'll see when you need the feel to make money. You'll see when you overtrade, you'll see when you hesitate. You'll see when you force entries, and you'll see when you break your rules. And if you do this for 90 days, that's when it starts to compound. Because now, you're just not watching trading lessons, you're building a trading identity. The trade that changes your career might not be the one you're taking, it might be the one you're not taking. Most people will watch this, they'll feel motivated, and they'll wake up tomorrow and open the charts up the exact same way. No journal, no execution rule, no stop rule, no [music] proof, and no lock-in. And then, they'll wonder why the same problems keep happening. But if you actually run this for the next 30 days, trading will start to look different. You will know how you feel before you trade, you'll know what rules you're following. You know when to stop, and you know when your model will have proof. And you will know what you're committed to mastering. In 30 days, your understanding your mistakes better. In 90 days, you'll have data around your model and around your system entirely. And in a year, if you really stick to this, you won't even recognize the type of trader you used to be. So, stop looking for another entry before you build a process around the entry. Because the strategy tells you where to enter, but your process tells you how to survive long enough to become consistent. And if you actually want to learn the opening range move model that I've been talking about throughout the video, simply click right here, and you have the full playlist. Go through that next, learn the model, then come back to this video and build the rules around it. Because once you have the process and strategy together, that's when trading starts to become repeatable.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/iSwj-o3-aWE" }, { "id": "5fcBYtYqKsA", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$224,000 Day Trading LIVE (10R Trade!)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fcBYtYqKsA", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 19, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 6.4, "shared_a_plus_score": 8.4, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 3846, "duration_seconds": 499, "chart_count": 12, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 83.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 124.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 166.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 208.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 249.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 291.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 332.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 374.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 416.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 457.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5fcBYtYqKsA/chart_12.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "5fcBYtYqKsA", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$224,000 Day Trading LIVE (10R Trade!)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fcBYtYqKsA", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 499, "view_count": 3846, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 9424, "transcript_path": "5fcBYtYqKsA/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 83.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 124.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 166.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 208.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 249.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 291.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 332.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 374.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 416.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 457.8 } ], "chart_count": 12, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "orm", "textbook", "short", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "take profit", "sweep", "bias" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "loss", "making", "losing", "nq", "es", "execution" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 6.4, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "drawdown", "stop loss", "invalidation" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 8.4, "keyword_hits": [ "bias", "confirmation", "london", "new york", "invalidation", "invalidate" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:48 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm up over $224,000 trading and this right here was the trade I ended up taking. The trade I took on live where I caught over a 10 R trade. A 10 R trade. Probably one of my biggest trades I've alerted in my Discord in my community in a while. The markets have been absolutely volatile recently and today we'll be going over exactly what caused me to take this trade, my bias, my look, and my execution. So, with that being said, let's get right into it. First things first, want to briefly go over the bias in terms of how we came into this idea of taking a short. Well, if you look at price here coming into the open, believe it or not, although we caught a short, I had a bullish bias. That was my narrative for today. I did want to see upside in the market and the reason was was because we saw an overnight sequence where price is relatively bullish and we had a nice build-up constantly creating higher lows and seeing price come up here and then distribute past these bearish imbalances. That on top of the factor that we had seen some bearish SMT off the highs as you compare NQ and ES here before the New York open, we had a high in ES which was made at around 11:00 a.m. on Monday where we ended up seeing a lower high being formed at minus week again. This is after open and on NQ, NQ had taken out that high. So, if we reference smaller time frame real quick and we see what we mean. Well, if you go to the 5-minute time frame and you see when we took out this high precisely, NQ ends up taking this high here at around 9:05 a.m. So, this is before the open. ES at 9:05 a.m. in relative to the high does not end up taking out that high until after the open at around 9:45 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. So, we have some bearish SMT and we see price offer um a a potential move back down. So, you have a bearish indication there in price for the market. And the reason I kind of mentioned that was because I wanted to see price off the open through our opening range move traded to a bearish state. So, I wanted to see price come down here off the open 3 and Q, and I wanted to see price ideally come into that and low. So, although I was bullish, I wanted to see a bearish sequence because I wanted to see the opening range move come down here, take out a gigantic area of sell side, and then see a sweep back up for a potential long riding continuation of what sentiment has done overall. So, again, higher time frame outlook bullish. Um and what I wanted to see was that SMT that we talked about getting violated, and then I wanted to see overnight price continue to do what it was doing, and then I wanted to see the opening range move, which was been which would be classified as New York price, to continue doing what it was doing after coming down here and taking out sell side. We've had many textbook days, and this would have been A++ had we came down here, seen London lows get taken out, and then seen a push back up. However, in hindsight, well, what we ended up doing was seeing a push into that SMT, which we invalidated, right? We saw price immediately come back up, and we ended up seeing price immediately trade um into higher price. So, for me specifically, I was entertaining the fact and upside in one of my first ideas for the day, which did not end up confirming, was a take that we had in mind on a long. And this is the trade here. It was on ES. And the reason you see me look to go ES here, by the way, is because of the fact that ES was leading between ES or between both assets, ES and NQ. Right? Reason you're able to tell that? Well, if you look at London highs here, and you see ES, you could see ES off the open Excuse me. Was very directional of where it wanted to go. If you look at NQ here off the open, well, that candle here at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Standard Eastern Standard Time was a bearish candle. However, ES's candle was bullish, right? 9:30 a.m. Eastern Standard Time, you see it actually closed at end up closing a bit of a doji, but this indication tells you that price off the open has divergence as we've had similarly in the past couple trading days, and then we see price end up trading higher. This is the idea here, and the idea was to ride back into this 4-hour gap CE and 4-hour gap fill. Stop was this one minute wick low or this one minute candle wick low. And then ultimately, um, going invert off this one minute gap. That was the idea, kind of a continuation take building on that higher time frame outlook. However, we end up start to see or we end up seeing a sell back down in the market. And this trade never ends up confirming as I do end up saying that, right? It never confirms and you never see me mention that I'm long um in the Discord. But then you end up seeing me pretty much say this, \"Interesting open. Had bearish SMT off the open plus divergence.\" Then we invalidated the SMT, bullish sequence by the way, um, to then meet a sell after. \"Need price to clear up. Good push down to London. Watching with you guys and waiting.\" So essentially, what I mean by that is that SMT that we referred to, we saw that bearish SMT get wiped out. So a very bullish confluence, only playing more into that bias. But then we end up seeing price come down here and eventually trade into those London lows, which is what we have initially wanted as the opening range move through the New York open. So for me, recognition here, what causes sell? Well, if you look at the daily time frame, we had a daily gap which we saw price come into play, right? This daily gap that started here and the end of here where we came into this daily gap and we had seen price come right back down. So that was the cause. And so for me specifically, all I was doing here now is I didn't have a plus bias. Bias was very clear. And that's okay. You have to remember, chat, sometimes your pri- your bias isn't going to always be there. You're not going to have a bias every single second of the market. And I was a bit neutral here. I don't know what's going to happen right here. But we end up getting clarity as price eventually comes down here. And after being patient, we see price run London lows. Excuse me. And you see price ultimately showcase interest in driving lower. And so from here, once London lows were ran, once that daily gap got tapped into and we saw higher time frame and an opening range move look here, um, once the stop got taken out, it showcased no hesitation in flipping back up. That told me, \"Okay, draw interest in Asia lows are likely here.\" We eventually end up seeing that happen. We come down here, and we eventually end up aligning the stars, right? Multi-time frame alignment, higher time frame daily gap, and then you see price sees good sell-off through New York lower time frame. We then were simply waiting for a retracement in the market to potentially capitalize. Now, this trade here was not A+. The reason you don't see me up millions of dollars today is because of the fact that this trade here wasn't A++. The trade I took on Friday was. It was a bit more through overnight and in New York. This is not that. So, I took standard risk, put $20,000 of risk on this trade, and you end up seeing me take this trade here on confirmation, which confirms at 10:30 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. Stop loss could have been right out of high here easily, but I ended up placing this one right at wick high just below it just cuz I felt if we saw price come back up and take that high out, there was a good chance of invalidation even higher. So, we end up seeing price come down here, and we end up seeing price consolidate, come into drawdown, but then eventually we meet the move into Asia lows. That was take profit one on the uh low was the hourly gap fill about a 1.1 R. That is when I trimmed on my consistency accounts on my prop firms, and then you end up seeing me look to ride the rest of this out on my personal account. We then see price just continue to continue to or continuously go. And similar to Friday, we just kept on dumping and dumping and dumping, creating lower highs and seeing price push down. And you can see as I learned this trade here, right? And I said, right? Potential short in play. Boom. Shorted, right? Mentioned I am short. And then you see me mention my targets. Every time something significant can happens, every time we had a TP or trail stops, you always see me mention that. All the way into the point where we end up seeing this trade come down here and move a 10 R. Trailed my final stop, and we ended up getting trailed out here at 28541 for about a 7.5 R if I remember on the personal account, a 10 R TP trade, and you see a beautiful move in the market where you end up seeing me make around $224,000. Again, reason being I was up around and my risk was around $20,000. And then, you could buy in the factor with um my other accounts combined $224 on the day. Um realistically, if I did size how I did on Friday, I probably would be up How what how much would I be up today? Maybe over half of what I'm on this trade. Um but again, like I said, I I took standard risk. And we ended up taking a good move on this trade. Still very blessed right? $220,000, I mean, chat Why am I you know, there's nothing to complain about that. Um so yeah, awesome day. With that being said, going to wrap it up here. Hope you guys liked my hat and the review TPT. And um see you guys in the next one. Peace out.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/5fcBYtYqKsA" }, { "id": "48ITl5FyKUg", "content_type": "video", "title": "Losing -$15,000 Day Trading Live (1 POINT AWAY FROM TP)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48ITl5FyKUg", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 20, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 4.8, "shared_a_plus_score": 8.4, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 2786, "duration_seconds": 410, "chart_count": 10, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 82.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 123.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 164.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 205.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 246.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 287.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 328.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 369.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/48ITl5FyKUg/chart_10.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "48ITl5FyKUg", "content_type": "video", "title": "Losing -$15,000 Day Trading Live (1 POINT AWAY FROM TP)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48ITl5FyKUg", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 410, "view_count": 2786, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 8110, "transcript_path": "48ITl5FyKUg/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 82.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 123.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 164.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 205.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 246.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 287.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 328.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 369.3 } ], "chart_count": 10, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "take profit", "liquidity", "sweep", "bias" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "loss", "losing", "session", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 4.8, "keyword_hits": [ "drawdown", "stop loss", "psychology" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 8.4, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:35 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm down a 1R. I'm down just shy of $15,000 in the trading session, and today's day was quite frustrating. This is because I ended up taking a loss. And after that loss, I ended up taking a second trade, which came all the way down but one point away from take profit. A day in where we're going to review and talk about Here were the two trades. This was the loser. This was the winner. But before we talk about exactly what the trades were, let's talk about why I took the trades where I did, why I got to here, and what was my bias coming into the session. So as you guys know, three main components when it comes to identifying our higher time frame looks, or excuse me, our bias. Higher time frame, overnight price, opening range move. Clearly, through the hourly time frame, as you could see, yesterday's New York session suggested a sell into our overnight low or into our hourly lows, which we then sold off from. If we reference ES real quick, on the hourly time frame, you could see that price on ES came down, and we had seen an external low get taken out within here. But then within yesterday's New York session, we also came back down and took out that low, in which took out this low, and traded back up higher. So for me, my perspective and thought process was, okay, we could potentially see a move higher into this potential hourly wick high. Um that's an area of interest where I felt price could have drawn into. And where where price could essentially go into due to the sweep of this low and due to price overnight trading bullish, right? If you reference the 15-minute time frame, and also the opening range move being bullish for the most part as well. Right? So if we head back to NQ here, and we look at kind of what we were doing here, again, with the lows installed, with the overnight sequence, with the opening range move, it was pretty clear in my eyes here that I felt price wanted to trade higher. So my bias coming into the open was I wanted to take a potential long. And the look that I had here was specifically pretty simple. The first trade that I ended up taking was a long based off a 1-minute gap rebalance paired up with two 1-minute gaps, which I combined for us to go in for. We came back up here, saw a beautiful sequence where we saw price essentially come back up, displace through the gap, but ultimately, we came back down after taking entry into stop loss. What I will say about this trade and my thought thought process behind this trade was I wanted to do a smaller stop smaller TP kind of mindset or kind of trade here because of the fact that price has been slower overall. As of recent, I found, at least for me, um even on days where we do well, a lot of it is mainly, I'd say, getting the bias right, but the timing's been not the best. And that's because the markets have been a bit more up and down recently. And so, for this thought process, I thought, \"Okay, coming into this first trade, I'm going to try to test something different, which is still have the same criteria, still have the same everything, but for me specifically, have smaller TPs, smaller stop, just so we could be able to potentially, you know, catch a move into into profit as opposed to waiting for the full, um you know, target to get smashed. So, we took entry here, got stopped out. That obviously did not work out. We saw price immediately come back down into drawdown. Then, after initially playing into that bull bias bias through that higher time frame look, through the overnight look, and through the opening range move, I think what came very clear very clear to me was that price potentially could have installed good highs. And good highs being the hourly BPR. Now, we did not take the fill of it until a little bit after. But, you see this hourly BPR getting filled where we see price come up, tap the fill point, and eventually come back down through reduced candle. ES as well had also installed decent highs as we had seen ES come up here and take out an hourly wick high, which we then saw price base around it, build off, and in hindsight, install our high of day. Now, going back to NQ after seeing that, a large part of what I looked for as our second trade came into place was how price would react through the highs that were installed. So, if we briefly look at this right here, you can see that I said, \"Idea, if we could see successful installment of those highs on ES and NQ plus the 5-minute gap being inverted, can see a nice push back into range. For now, ES is pushing well off the gap, but if we were to flip, could see a nice sell. NQ seemingly is weaker, so that would be or that would be the take. Here's or here's a very look at what we could see. So, essentially, I was marking out a potential 5-minute gap going inverted as a trade that we could end up taking because we ended up seeing assets start to flip off or flip turn around and flip flip around um lower potentially. So, that was kind of the ideology with this look here is with the highs installed and the displacement that we're getting off the high, it made sense that we could potentially flip narrative. And I'm not necessarily looking for for reversal here. You know, we had a this FOMC move and we saw overnight lows get taken out here in a crazy displaceive move. I'm just looking for a sequence where we come back down and take out internal lows. That's it. Um and so, eventually, we end up coming down here and this 5-minute gap eventually gets up eventually ends up getting inverted. We end up taking our entry through 1-minute confirmation, right? Ideal 1-minute confirmation off this trade is right here at 12:00 12:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. I ended up taking my entry around uh 12:24. Just waited a bit more. Um we ended up taking entry, going a bit of drawdown, but ultimately come back down here. Here's the frustrating part. Being down a minus one R, we ended up taking this trade here. Had we hit TP, we would have mitigated a loss and been in profit. Um and you end up seeing price come down here and almost tease a point away from take profit. Now, for a lot of traders, and I made a reel about this, uh but a lot of traders, what they end up doing is in situations like this, they can get very frustrated, emotionally trade, feed into their emotions, just do something dumb that would completely not only cause them to trade down, but cause them to wipe out and get into deeper drawdown than they should be, right? For me, from a human standpoint, there's a human standpoint and a trader standpoint. A human standpoint is is very frustrating. To me, obviously, it sucks from a human standpoint because we moved to 99% of the way into the direction of the target, but then we turn around right before target got hit. So, through the liquidity aspect, through ICT aspect, it's a a frustrating, but from a trader's perspective, Chad, I've been trading for over 6 years. And every single time I've not followed my system, every single time I've gone against my system, it's never worked out, ever. So, for me specifically, what I'm doing here is I'm looking to just continue to follow my plan. It's either that or you do nothing. That's it, right? As a trader, you have two options. You either follow your plan or you gamble trade and it never works out and you do nothing. So, um that's the honest truth. This is You continue to follow your system on occasions like this or you just go against it and it never works out. And I know this could be very frustrating, but I felt like this is a great review for you guys who are watching because we could really go over and you guys could see that traders like myself we still have these type of trades. We still have these type of days where price could trade pretty pretty bad. So, uh with that being said, I'm going to wrap it up here. That's the review, a bit of a psychology one, but make sure you guys continue to follow your system and keep doing well even though, you know, you can have days like this like I had today. So, stay safe, y'all. Peace out and I'm going to catch you guys in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/48ITl5FyKUg" }, { "id": "tFY2f23U_Jw", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$117,000 in 2 Hours of Trading! (BANGER)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFY2f23U_Jw", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 21, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 1.6, "shared_a_plus_score": 8.4, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 2319, "duration_seconds": 393, "chart_count": 9, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 43.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 87.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 131.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 174.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 218.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 262.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 305.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 349.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/tFY2f23U_Jw/chart_09.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "tFY2f23U_Jw", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$117,000 in 2 Hours of Trading! (BANGER)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFY2f23U_Jw", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 393, "view_count": 2319, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 7438, "transcript_path": "tFY2f23U_Jw/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 43.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 87.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 131.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 174.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 218.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 262.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 305.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 349.3 } ], "chart_count": 9, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "textbook", "long", "stop", "take profit", "fair value gap", "liquidity", "sweep", "bias", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "making", "session", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 1.6, "keyword_hits": [ "risk" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 8.4, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "fair value gap", "bias", "session", "london" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:51 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I made over $117,000 day trading using this one simple strategy. And if you want to know what the trade was, this is the trade right here. Took one trade, made over $117,000. And in today's review, I'll be going over exactly what the trade was, what my bias was, and how I was able to pinpoint this entry, and execute it live in front of 500 plus people. Let's get into it. So, a beautiful day. I had to wow, 117k on the day. Well, you guys have to remember, it's a total sum of every all my accounts combined. Did really well copy trading utilizing Trade Copia. And what we were able to do, well, we were able to catch a long on ES here specifically. Well, why ES? Before we get into it, let's talk about our bias starting through higher time frame. Looking at ES and NQ off higher time frame narrative coming coming into the open, we had seen price through Monday seek a large sell sequence. Our prior to Monday, we had seen a large sell sequence. Um and also into Monday, we had seen this hourly low get swapped. This hourly wick low, which was an area of significance that we ended up seeing price um take out. And so, essentially, what I was looking at for price to do, as we referred to yesterday's review, was looking for price to see a reaction. We see a bullish reaction as we sweep the low, and we see price come all the way back up inverting and violating these arrays. And so, my bias coming into the open was naturally leading towards upside. However, we had seen a pretty stagnant overnight sequence. If we reference higher time frames on NQ on the hourly time frame, what you could see is that price was kind of doing a very similar thing. We don't end up seeing as clear of a move on NQ in terms of the low, but we do see a good move. In terms of overnight price, what we were able to get a gauge here of was price through London and Asia. As you guys know with our three-step process in identifying our bias, part one, higher time frame, part two, overnight price, and part three, the opening range move. In terms of price overall through the overnight session, you end up seeing price for the most part sell off initially through Asia, build back up, and then chop through the majority of London. So, a pretty stagnant, volatile, but rangy overnight session. We were trading near the highs on NQ kind of coming into the open. However, here's the important thing. Off the open, what we were able to identify was we were able to identify a bullish sequence on ES compared to NQ. If you look at our open here at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Standard Time, what you could see is that 9 that 9:35 minute candle on NQ happened to be a bearish candle, whilst on ES at 9:30 specifically, we end up seeing a bullish candle. So, what you see off the open here is you see divergence created in the market. You see price on ES lead by creating bullish movement towards the upside, and then you see NQ be the weaker asset by creating movement towards the downside. Now, for me kind of coming into the open utilizing the opening range move, I was more neutral than anything, but if I had to lean towards one direction, obviously it would have been higher for you via the higher time frame markup. What I was looking at now was I was looking for an area of interest where price was around to get a gauge off the opening range move. What I mean by that is out through higher time frame, referencing the hourly, price was trading around this point in time. And what I was looking for price to do was I was looking for price to react off a certain area of liquidity through higher time frame injunction with our opening range move. So, I wanted two in one essentially to occur. And you see that happen here. You see price come down, and we have an hourly BPR, balanced price range. I've been almost in love with them past week or so, but I've been using them a lot for my entries and for my buys. You have a bullish, right, fair value gap, and you have a bearish fair value gap, which turned into a bullish inversion fair value gap. From there, we see price wake up, and the opening range move indefinitely sweeps the low, and for NQ, as we talked about, to be the asset which was weaker because you see price on or you see price on NQ sell off the 9:30 open, but on ES, you see price um build up. We knew that ES was the leading asset. So, from there, we stood patient and simply waited for an entry in the market. We end up taking that eventually down the line as we see the opening range move on NQ end up being a bullish one. And again, the bearish asset, the asset which is weaker, causing a bullish move here is very bullish for ES. And so, we end up taking our trade here. And the entry model per se off this take was a 5-minute bearish inversion fair fair value gap violation. So, that can sound a little bit confusing. Let me explain. Initially, we had a bullish fair value gap here on the 5-minute time frame. Then we turned into a bearish imbalance by bearish inversion fair value gap. And now we're looking for price to come back up and violate that bearish imbalance for a potential entry in the market. But again, remember chat, this isn't us just taking our entry purely off entry. We're not looking at a simple gap to go invert, and boom, that's our entire confluence. We had our bias dictated, the opening range move, and higher time frame outlook, and we combined that out All we simply did was look for an entry model that was simply clear. And this is one of those, right? There wasn't many imbalances offered on the 5-minute time frame. ES, this was like the only imbalance off the open that clearly offered. You have this right here, but it was very small. We then see price essentially retrace after initially taking out liquidity. There was a risk factor with this trade being that we Asia highs were taken out prior. So, there could have been a potential reversal, but what I was looking for was I was looking for price to override that. As you guys know, I view price over liquidity. And so, for me, although we took it in a good area of liquidity, if price was still showcasing interest in higher, we simply looked to take this trade. We create a higher low here, right, as price consistently creates more bullish displays. Then we end up taking our trade as the trade confirms specifically at 10:31 a.m. Eastern Standard Time as that 1-minute candle closes above, and we confirm and invert the 5-minute gap. Stop was the swing low. We went risk-free once high of day was taken out, and our take profit one interest was clear as day, which was our 1-hour BPR entry. If you look at the channel here in which we end up seeing here, right, I end up mentioning that, right, break-even stops high of day, TP1 entries off the hourly BPR. We go break-even stops once high of day gets taken out, and then we see price take out that take profit one, which ends up putting us up at our 2.3R on the day, and then we see price go higher, and we simply trail with that. So, a beautiful day overall, and we end up capitalizing on a textbook trade with a textbook entry. We've had very similar entries the past week and a half, the entirety of last week and this week so far. It's been like the exact same framework every single day. So, a beautiful one, a beautiful trade. That's pretty much it. Hopefully you guys enjoyed the recap. I'll catch you guys in the next one, and I'll see you guys live on Discord tomorrow. Peace out.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/tFY2f23U_Jw" }, { "id": "km8lPYin8FE", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +39,000 Day Trading Live on The NinjaTrader Show! (1800+ People)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=km8lPYin8FE", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 22, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 1.6, "shared_a_plus_score": 8.4, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 2079, "duration_seconds": 442, "chart_count": 11, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 80.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 120.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 160.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 201.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 241.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 281.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 321.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 362.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 402.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/km8lPYin8FE/chart_11.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "km8lPYin8FE", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +39,000 Day Trading Live on The NinjaTrader Show! (1800+ People)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=km8lPYin8FE", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 442, "view_count": 2079, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 8399, "transcript_path": "km8lPYin8FE/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 80.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 120.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 160.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 201.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 241.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 281.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 321.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 362.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 402.3 } ], "chart_count": 11, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "orm", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "take profit", "fair value gap", "sweep", "bias", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "making", "session", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 1.6, "keyword_hits": [ "drawdown" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 8.4, "keyword_hits": [ "fair value gap", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:38 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm up just shy of $40,000 day trading live, and here was the trade that I took that got me that result. It was on NT Live, Ninja Trader live show, where I hopped on with great people like Anthony Crudele, Trader Kane, and Leo, and we caught an absolute beautiful long. They ended up taking a long a bit earlier than me, but I still capitalized in a beautiful continuation model trade, and yeah, before we talk about the trade, let's talk about the bias, let's talk about why I thought about taking the trade where I did, and essentially why we got the result in which we did. So, coming into the open, my bias is pretty clear. What I wanted to see price do was off the open provide some clarity. I mentioned this on the NT Live if you were there this morning in front of 1,800 plus people. Um, we ended up seeing price through the overnight sequence come down here and take out a pretty significant low. For ES, not so much overnight where we had to see this 4-hour fair value gap entering this daily gap being tapped, but with NQ specifically through the instance of London, we ended up seeing price come down here and take out a major area of low, which was our previous week low. Pretty I believe so, if not an hourly uh internal low. We then see price essentially cause a reaction off that low. And one of the first instances, one of the main two components of identifying when we want to see reversal in the market, simply put, is when we see a major low being put in place. And the second uh main component is seeing the reaction off the low. And Trader Kane had a good point this morning, which I completely agreed on. If price ever wants to take out a low, it should theoretically move off the low immediately. And that's exactly kind of what we did here on the hourly time frame. We ended up seeing price come down here, and we saw an aggressive sell into that low, which we then came down, took, and immediately met back back up higher. However, we did start a we did start slowing down before the London open. And so for me, a great point in what I wanted to see price do was see how the opening range moved with trade. So, we come into the open, obviously through the higher time frame look, we see some major area of sell side being wiped away. Right, although sentiment has been more bearish overall, we see a major low being put in place, which is good, you know, important. And then we also see price off the overnight sequence display, so we kind of kind of get that multi-timeframe alignment. We see higher timeframe low getting taken out through the overnight sequence. And now the third and final part with our bias is identifying the opening range move. Off the open here through NQ, what we're able to see is that ES between ES and NQ ES was the leading asset. And the way you're able to tell that >> [clears throat] >> was because prior to the open, you had seen ES dominate the buy sequence in terms of buy to buy versus NQ and ES. Right, you could see that NQ is creating lower lows. You were seeing that ES was creating higher lows. But most importantly, off the open, you see price come up at the top of this range, and you see price immediately attack our London high, where NQ does not end up taking out the London high until later on in the session. For reference, if you always want to compare and contrast purely based off time in, you know, um in the market, go based [clears throat] off recent highs and recent lows. So for today's example, our London high, you see that we end up taking out this high specifically at um a.m. You don't see ES or you don't see NQ take out its high through London or Asia all the way until we end up seeing price trade into 10:18 a.m. So 18 minutes after is when NQ ended up taking out its high as opposed to ES, which took it out 18 minutes earlier. So we were able to recognize, okay, we put in a good low, we end up taking out a good low overnight through a higher timeframe level, we see a bullish move off that low, right? Two main components for reversal. And now the opening range move is trading bullish, but more specifically, the opening range move is trading more bullish on ES. We see price come up here, and eventually what we end up doing after seeing that ES high is we end up seeing a slight retracement. Now my initial entry that I did want to enter off in the market was this two one or this two-minute Excuse me, these two one-minute gaps right here where had we seen price come down here and rebalance off taking area of interest for entry. The idea was we see price come down, rebalance and tap the gap, and then not only are we seeing a bounce confirming the entry to the trade, but we're also seeing a bounce confirming a confirmation for price trading higher. Again, chat, every time we always talk about this, whenever we take out a significant high, we always have one of two reactions. We either see price obviously sweep, or we see price to show indication for higher. And what do you see price do? The moment we see a retracement sequence, we immediately buy back up, and price price showcases strength through the push in this one-minute high, and ultimately trade up higher. This my entry there. We ultimately ended up getting a take on the live right where I essentially looked for a one-minute gap retest here on this ES gap right here. This gap wasn't as obviously decisive as these two one-minute gaps right here, but it was still a decent size gap. You see price essentially come down here. We see price retrace into this gap, and we ultimately end up seeing price draw back higher. The confirmation candle here, ideally in terms of this take right here, was around 10 10 10:10 a.m. or 10:10 a.m. Excuse me, but I ended up taking this trade here at around 10:13, the end of uh 10:13's candle closure. We then had to ultimately end up entering or excuse me, entering this trade. Our first take profit is our yesterday New York highs, and then our second take profit is based off an hourly gap fill right here. So, this this level right here, 76.87, was an hourly gap fill, and as we always talk about when it comes to marking out levels, two main things: Look at higher time frame and look for large gaps, and look for large wicks. We ended up seeing price come up here, and we completely smashed these targets to where we eventually end up getting trailed out on this position on my runners or on my live account through this one-minute wick low. So, TP1 realized the majority of the trade through prop firms realizing, okay, I'm just going to look to compound one and all mindset. Personal account, I typically always hold and just look to trail or we eventually end up coming down here and like I said, trail out off this one minute wick low. So, beautiful trade. The entry model again confirmation was off the one minute gap. We bounced, closed a very strong closure and what do you know, whenever you use confirmation, typically you're more so more so than not you tend usually have trades go into immediate profit, which is what we did here. We take this trade and this is immediately in profit. There is no drawdown to this trade at all. Stop placement was based off this one minute wick low. And we ultimately end up seeing price validate and trade up higher. TP1 was about a 1.1R. TP2 was about I think a 3R but I ended up getting trailed out for about a 2.2. So, beautiful day nonetheless after recognizing our bias higher time frame with that hourly low being taken out through overnight price and seeing a very bullish opening range move on the asset through ES, which was the leading asset. So, simple day but overall but a day in where we came in and capitalized. To be honest, I'm just glad price price performed today because I was able to go on that NinjaTrader live for the first time and actually take something. Um, you know, price as of the past couple days has not been the best. Again, you go back to Monday, Monday was just a show in price action. Um, so I was kind of hoping, you know, we weren't doing that. Not going to lie, off the open it did look like it did a little bit but ultimately we saw price eventually come up here and we saw price offer um, you know, continuation higher and validation through our look on the hourly sweep. So, with that being said, that's the review. Hopefully you guys enjoyed this one. I'm going to catch you guys in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/km8lPYin8FE" }, { "id": "0rcuKmquqJw", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making $100,000+ Day Trading Live in 1 Hour! (BANGER)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rcuKmquqJw", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 23, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 1.6, "shared_a_plus_score": 8.4, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1969, "duration_seconds": 534, "chart_count": 13, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 82.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 123.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 164.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 205.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 246.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 287.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 328.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 369.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 410.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 452.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 493.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/0rcuKmquqJw/chart_13.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "0rcuKmquqJw", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making $100,000+ Day Trading Live in 1 Hour! (BANGER)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rcuKmquqJw", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 534, "view_count": 1969, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 10018, "transcript_path": "0rcuKmquqJw/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 82.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 123.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 164.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 205.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 246.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 287.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 328.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 369.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 410.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 452.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 493.1 } ], "chart_count": 13, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "short", "long", "stop", "target", "take profit", "liquidity", "sweep", "bias" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "loss", "making", "session", "nq", "es", "execution" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 1.6, "keyword_hits": [ "risk" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 8.4, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "bias", "session", "london", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:47 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "I am up over $100,000 day trading live and this is the trade I took. One of our mindset took an ES long where we saw a price validate and run into our take profit. But before we go into the trade and talk about the trade, let's talk about my bias. Let's talk about the execution and exactly why I thought the way I did and why I put risk on where I did. So, coming into the open from the top looking at the hourly time frame, you could see that price was very consolidated. We haven't had or we didn't see much of movement in price coming into the open. Um and so for me, you know, my bias coming into the open was a bit more neutral to start off. What I wanted to see price do was I wanted to see price have a good opening range move. Essentially, the first move after New York open is what I wanted to see price do and more so have a good reaction. What we end up seeing price here off the open do is we end up seeing price take out London lows and then see a move back up. Now, what I will say before taking our trade, it was a pretty choppy session, right? It was pretty up and down. Price wasn't the worst, but we were seeing price consistently trade up and down in range. However, what fit into my bull bias, what made me a bit more bullish was New York specifically. If you take a look at NQ here and you look at NQ and ES, first things first, ES was the leading asset. ES was the asset in which was dominant today and you could sell you could determine that based upon the fact that NQ had seen Asia lows get taken out versus ES not doing that more so, right? So, you see you you take a look at NQ, you can see that NQ dumped so much to the fact that we traded into our overnight lows, specifically Asia lows, and you look at ES and we're nowhere near to be seen. So, first things first, recognizing conditions, we were able to tell that ES is the asset in which is holding better. From there, what I more so looked at is large liquidity areas around that hourly time frame. So, recognizing that the hourly time frame wasn't trading at the best pace, what I was more so looking to base off here if you're if you're going to take a trade today, was more so off the range highs and lows. Recognizing that we were in a range, we're looking to take range trades. And so, looking at NQ here, after recognizing that ES was the leading asset off the open, and recognizing that NQ had come down here to take it out take out Asia lows, what I wanted to see price was showcase an interest reversal in the market. And after seeing price come down here again, sweeping New York lows again, and then seeing price take out our previous day low, which was right here, what I wanted to see, just like how we did initially here, is instead of just seeking a short-term pop back up, I wanted to see price ideally come all the way back up and showcase interest and reversal through the range. Again, hourly time frame is trading up and down a pretty large range through overnight in New York price the past couple days. And so, all I was trying to do was I was trying to time that in the market. So, I was looking for a reversal trade up higher. There's a 100% chance where off the open we could have came down here, took out PDL, took out Asia lows, took out this hourly wick low, and then seen much lower, for sure. We could have seen a breakdown. But, we did not, and we were able to recognize that through staying patient and waiting for price to clear up. So, after recognizing that, you know, we've been in range and we're trying to more so anticipate the move through market structure shift, and recognizing that ES is a leading asset based off the fact that NQ took out Asia lows and ES did not, what I wanted to see price now do after taking out liquidities, I wanted to see displace. So, Lanto, why take your entry up here? If you wanted to play a range and you had the anticipation of a reversal, why not take your entry lower, you know, before that area of interest? Well, like I said, when it comes to reversal trades, not only do you want to predict, but you want to react, and you want to have a high probability in your reversal trades. How many times have you guys taken a trade and you guys have gotten caught up with a simple take of a low and then a move back up, inverting a 1-minute gap, for example, then coming right back down. For me, what offsets that and what drives up probability in reversal trades, which are tougher to catch, is displacement. So, you don't see me look for a trade here up until we see price come back up and we displace a certain amount. And what I wanted to see was multiple gaps get violated, multiple bearish gaps get violated for potential in upside interest before taking this long. We eventually end up coming up here and we end up seeing price reclaim back above this once used to be previous bullish BPR, where we then see price close back over. So, my initial entry when we came coming into the morning was this BPR retest, which I wanted to see price come down into and tap into. What do we end up seeing price do? We end up seeing price instead of initially just tapping, we see price do come down and we see price violate the gap. But from there, we see price take out liquidity in this low low of day on New York again. And again, after recognizing that ES was the leading asset, we looked at ES to take the trade. We then see price come back up and once we reclaimed over, I justify this entry just as good as it was before, maybe slightly off cuz we saw a violation of it. But what did we see price do? We saw price violate the gap but then come back up and claim back over, which was what most most important. And ideally, what the most important thing is price action here. So, the stop idea for this trade was this one minute wick low. Initially, I had low of day but I felt had price were to come back down here, the idea of price running back down lower, at least into its low of day, is likely. So, we mitigated some potential loss there just to kind of offset it and we end up confirming on this trade here at around 10:25 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. But before I talk about the trade specifically, what I do want to talk about is I want to talk about price and the main risk factor when it comes to taking this trade here today. And that being the range. If you guys look at this chart and if you look at this chart here specifically looking at MES, what you could see happen today through ES is you could see five areas of swept liquidity. So, if a look, number one, swept London lows right here. We swept London highs right here. Right, we swept low of day through New York right here. We swept high of day through right here. And then we end up sweeping low of day again at this number five point in New York. So, at this point in time, you could be like, \"Mikel, we're very range bound, right?\" And I completely agree. But specifically with price here, what I was looking for was for an major area of liquidity to get taken out through NQ and look for that reversal back up. Chat, had there not been any divergence today, had there not been any indication or any major low being taken out today, there would have not been a take because price was truthfully range bound, especially on the hourly time frame. So, for me, unless there was a good area of liquidity being taken out and we got that signature reversal look, there was no take again, chat. Two points Two main points when it comes to looking for reversals. Market structure shift and liquidity taken. So, when it comes to the MSS specifically, we want to see price displace aggressively in price action. After taking liquidity in sell side, you want to see price displace. And what do we do here? We do just that. So, when we see price come back up here and displace, we have clear objectives for NQ being overnight highs and for ES being this hourly wick high. Target of interest on this trade was this hourly wick high. And the main risk factor behind this take here as we took was this here specifically. Looking at this right here and recognizing that price was consistently sweeping not only highs, but lows, what I was more so curious about and what we were going to do was how we were to react once taking out highs. You see me kind of mention that in the commentary piece today and discuss it on live a little bit after saying we're long. I pretty much talk about the factor of the reaction in the high of day that we do take out on ES here would determine whether we hit take profit or we hit break even on this trade. And for us, what do we see price do? We see price come up and we take out high of day. We engulf past and we see price ultimately come up here, and we see price run into take profit for about a 1.8R. So, to start off the week, we're pretty flat, right? We took a half our loss Monday, paper cut. We took a half our win yesterday, paper cut, or or more so a small winner. But, today we finally end up seeing price follow through, and we see validation of our thesis, which again mainly came with the idea and the adapt adaptation of what the markets have been recently. So, again, looking at the hourly, recognizing that price was slow, more so in range bound high to lows. So, what I was looking to try to do today was catch range bound moves. And so, we see price come down here. We see price sweep Asia lows, New York low of day, and previous day low within this move here. We come back up, and recognizing that ES was a leading asset, we then took there, went risk free at highs, and we knew as soon as we engulfed past this high of day on ES, that probability and us driving into take profit was there. And that's pretty much that. So, that's the review summed up in a nutshell. Then amazing, over $100,000 earned across all my prop accounts and my live accounts combined. Killed it on Topstep, Lucid, TradiFi, and the chat killed it as well. Got a beautiful trade to set us up for the week. With that being said, that's the review. See you guys in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/0rcuKmquqJw" }, { "id": "rsbGjXOSJq0", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$26,000 in Less Than 2 Hours! (Today was HARD!)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsbGjXOSJq0", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 24, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 6.4, "shared_a_plus_score": 8.4, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1780, "duration_seconds": 551, "chart_count": 13, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 42.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 84.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 127.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 169.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 211.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 254.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 296.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 338.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 381.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 423.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 466.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 508.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/rsbGjXOSJq0/chart_13.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "rsbGjXOSJq0", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$26,000 in Less Than 2 Hours! (Today was HARD!)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsbGjXOSJq0", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 551, "view_count": 1780, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 10565, "transcript_path": "rsbGjXOSJq0/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 42.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 84.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 127.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 169.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 211.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 254.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 296.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 338.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 381.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 423.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 466.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 508.3 } ], "chart_count": 13, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "orm", "short", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "fair value gap", "sweep", "bias" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "p&l", "making", "losing", "session", "scalp", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 6.4, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "psychology", "revenge", "fomo" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 8.4, "keyword_hits": [ "fair value gap", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "invalidate" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:37 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today I'm up just shy of $26,000 day trading live. And here was the trade that ended up making me that money. But before we talk about the trade directly, let's talk about today overall and how I had an instance earlier on this morning where I had a trade that I missed out completely. A beautiful short that I just completely missed out on. And let's talk about that. So come coming into the open perspective was pretty neat. inside the Discord. We had a look through the overnight session that I wanted to see price do. Let me bring that up for you guys real quick. Right here, you can clearly see I say a couple reference points today on the hourly and 4hour look. Looking for a move into either internal points 29720 or 29468. The reaction off either point will help the clarity and bias similar to the opening range move. Look, it's a higher time frame look move. Make a move into either level. take the level and reaction confirms interest. From there, we have a couple draw levels to work with. Monday's price seemingly wasn't good enough to trade as we just stuck inside the very small range from Friday. So, looking at price through overnight, what I wanted to see price do was react into an overnight or inside an internal high or low to the higher time frame. Look, these would be external levels through your lower time frame um levels or lower time frame um alignment. What I wanted to see price do was either take out the significant area and buy side or the significant area and sell side. That's what I wanted to do. This would help us get an identity behind what price wanted to do coming into Tuesday. And we did ended up seeing that. What we ended up seeing price do through the hourly time frame in the overnight sequence on ES and NQ was more so specifically ES in comparison. NQ was a bit weaker. It was slower slash weaker. But specifically with NQ again, if you look at that visual that we just talked about right here, we wanted to see a higher low get taken out. What do we see price do on the hourly time frame? We see price immediately come up and we see price tag out this buyside level in 29704. Now coming into the open, we saw a very good sell because we ended up seeing price come up, take out that high, then eventually reverse and head back down lower. So for me in my instance the what I wanted to see off the open was I wanted to see price come down here through NQ and I wanted to see price attack that sellside side. So when we ended up coming into the open and saw the sell that we did I was pretty happy because I wanted to see that area low get taken out. We eventually end up seeing the open which we did came down here took out L on lows. Then we eventually look at that draw level in 29468. First idea that we ended up having coming into the open after initially seeing that sauce had taken out was the thought process I had was I wanted to see price come back into range. There was two possible scenarios here similar to opening range move. We either see price take out a level and seek continuation or we see price take out a level and seek reversal. So we would either come down here and take out this low and showcase interest and reversal back up higher or we would come down here take out the low and showcase interest and continuation. What do we see price do? Well initially after taking out that low we see price immediately come back up. And so therefore I was interested in the potential reversal take back into range. One of the first looks I was looking at right here was the idea and the potential one IG long seeing a reaction off lows if we could invalidate array can look for promising move back into range. Need good displacement here engulfing candles plus good confirmation. So the initial intent was okay we came down here. Look at that hourly time frame. We see price on the hourly come down. Take out that low after taking out that high over overnight. What I wanted to see price now do is I wanted to see price react that off that low. We then see price come back up here and we see price essentially trade into this one minute gap which we never inverted. The important thing as you guys know time and time again with Lanto's confirmation is we look for a good engulfing sequence with a closure above validating the inversion sequence. We never got the closure. We did wick above it slightly never invalidated. But as this was going on what this more so showed me than anything else was that price was not prepared to head back up um yet. So for me what I was thinking about was okay in the case price initially did sweep here off the reaction off the low if we wanted to see price respect this gap instead of invert it which would have again told us that price wanted to see lower as opposed to reversal. What if we wanted to see lower and see lower now? And so for me specifically recognizing on the hourly reference as we discussed when we first started talking about price here you can see that ES on the hourly time frame was more so overall bearish coming into the open. So for me, as long as there was no divergence flip off the open, I knew that ES was the weaker asset. So in the case we wanted to take a long, it would be NQ. In the case we wanted to take a short, it would be ES. So for me, looking at price and looking at NQ, which is supposedly supposed to be the stronger asset, what we see price do is respect this format gap here. Instead of inverting it and confirming our bullish bias and our bullish entry, we see price respect that gap. So for B specifically, what I was looking for for ES here was I was looking for a potential rejection where we could take a uh take a short back down for lower draw. What we also ended up doing here is initially ENQ comes down here. We do end up seeing ENQ take out the L and low and we do end up seeing price take out 29468, but specifically with that low ES did not. So we had some clear draw. Yes, we did have SMT, but it was clear draw for ES in the case we wanted to see lower. Well, what do we do then? We see price retrace and we see price ultimately come back down where then you see me pinpoint a potential entry point in this form at a gap go short right idea liking London lows draw on ES here such a huge spot but with this with the state of price and a little respect off the low so far I believe we could head lower I did here so I'm at IFG stop right of high break even of low TP running right under hourly gap fill 7685 so for me recognize okay lento you're looking for a reversal here off the higher time frame look because we did end up taking out low fair. But what you see simply put is you see a large sell displac. And this now instead of looking for a reversal, this now more so looks like a retracement. Why? Well, although we did end up seeing a sweep of the low, we ended up seeing price respect the very first area we tap into. The very first one minute gap we retested, we immediately respected. That is bearish. We then end up seeing this short present here which was a one minute gap go short again an invert and eventually we end up coming into this trade and ultimately missed the entry because the confirmation candle the closure was the same candle which printed all the way down essentially near that break even. So at this point I was quite frustrated cuz I was like damn we had a beautiful short lined up here. Was it a large R? No, it was a 1.2. But had we taken an entry a simple scalp to put ourselves on the right side to start the week off we missed it. And for most traders, they would get frustrated by this. They would get very annoyed by missing this trade. For me, I was not. I simply stuck to my rules. And me sticking to my rules is what allowed me to be able to capitalize on the trade and which I did later on. Most traders, you know, nowadays who are brand new would see this revenge trade or FOMO in into a trade just because they were expecting to see a realized P&L soon enough through their short. They immediately come into a trade, look for a trade right away, and they feed into those emotions. They completely just abandoned their psychology, their system, and their plan. And so for me, I stood patient and eventually we did end up installing a good low. We saw price come down here, fill this hourly gap, fill on ES, and with NQ, we eventually started to seek that displacement back up, right? This no longer looked like a retracement like we did here. This more so looked like a reversal because we saw consistent upside movement. The initial move off the low here was not that. We ended up seeing price come up and reject a one minute gap. Eventually, we had the same look for a potential long, but we wanted to see this one minute gap go invert. Stop idea was this one minute gap fill for this trade idea. Eventually ended up coming back up here and confirming on this trade specifically at break even zone was this one minute gap entry. Initially, it was placed off this one minute gap fill, but I moved it up a little bit higher because I had recognized that price was very up and down. chat. Had conditions been perfect, had conditions, you know, said, you know, we come down here, take out the slow, and we immediately flip back up with clear displacement, I would have looked for potential closer break even and be more strict off the reversal look. But since price was so up and down, I recognize that if we keep our stops too close to or are breaking the stops too close, that could allow us to take this trade, come up, take our break even, come right back down and invalidate our entry, but not invalidate the thesis behind a look again, which was higher. We wanted to see higher. So I felt how we came up here. This one minute wick entry or this one minute fair value gap entry was an appropriate area to go risk- free. We eventually go risk- free and then immediately hit TP a couple minutes after. Just a beautiful trade overall again where we look for the same look as we did initially right here. This one minute gap go long with the structure that we had placed off the low. Again this was not a retracement here right compared to this. This was a reversal in the market. We see price come up here. We take the trade and a 1.3R is what we realize at I close on prop firms. either trailing my personal account, closing the trade for a $26,000 return. Simply being patient, following my psychology plan, following my trading plan, and moving on forward. With that being said, that's the review. Hopefully you guys enjoyed that. I'mma catch you guys in the next\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/rsbGjXOSJq0" }, { "id": "ZjH1TmhMGJQ", "content_type": "video", "title": "Losing -$41,000 Day Trading (1 Tick Away From TP!)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjH1TmhMGJQ", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 25, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 3.2, "shared_a_plus_score": 8.4, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1690, "duration_seconds": 433, "chart_count": 10, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 43.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 86.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 129.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 173.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 216.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 259.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 303.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 346.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 389.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZjH1TmhMGJQ/chart_10.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "ZjH1TmhMGJQ", "content_type": "video", "title": "Losing -$41,000 Day Trading (1 Tick Away From TP!)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjH1TmhMGJQ", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 433, "view_count": 1690, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 8712, "transcript_path": "ZjH1TmhMGJQ/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 43.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 86.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 129.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 173.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 216.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 259.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 303.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 346.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 389.5 } ], "chart_count": 10, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "orm", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "take profit", "fair value gap", "bias", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "loss", "losing", "session", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 3.2, "keyword_hits": [ "drawdown", "stop loss" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 8.4, "keyword_hits": [ "fair value gap", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:45 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm down just shy $41,000 day trading, took a loss in the market, and this is the exact trade I took. But before we get into the trade and why it lost and what I learned, let's talk about exactly what my bias was, what I thought about coming into the open, and why I took the trade where I did. So, starting off on the hourly timeframe, what we're able to see is that we had hourly basis be very bullish based off yesterday's price, and then based off today's New York opening range move, we see a pretty bullish move in the market, right? Where we see a good build up. If you watch yesterday's review, we had a healthy day based upon the fact of us riding into this bull bias. What you then see price do through overnight price and for the bulk of New York is you see price come up here, and you see price finally trade out of its hourly range. So, this hourly range here had a low, had a high, and today we finally stuck out of that, and it looks like we're kind of building back up trading to the potential of the all-time high. So, for me specifically coming into the open, what I wanted to see price do was see how we wanted to trade. Initially through Asia, we had a bit of a good buy sequence, but for the most part, it was a consolidation overnight session. And so, off the open here when we saw price build up and we saw our opening range move trade into London highs, and we see a very bullish sequence. For me, that interested me in the potential of trading up higher. I will say I I went live around 11:00 a.m. today. Had I traded direct open, I don't know how many entries there would have been for us to capitalize off of a very good long. Looks like off the open, we just kind of ripped up tremendously. So, for me, popped on, excuse me, around 12:00 um trading from there on out, and we ended up taking our first trade of the day. Initially, after seeing what price was doing and having our bull bias determined via higher timeframe and also determining through our New York opening range move, what I wanted to see price would do obviously was see continuation. We had clear draw in mind being this 4-hour gap fill right here on the NQ, right? And we also had an hourly gap fill as well. ES specifically had an hourly gap, which I wanted to see price trade into, and we eventually end up doing that in hindsight. But ultimately, we end up getting stopped out for a loss even though our bias was right. Well, why did that happen? Well, simply put, this is the trade that we ended up taking. It was a 5-minute gap rebalance where we looked for confirmation, and your clear-cut confirmation off this trade, purely just off a 5-minute gap rebalance, would have been right here. So, your entry would have been right here at around 1:01 p.m. And I took the entry where I did a minute after is because I wanted to see this 1-minute uh bearish gap get violated, which is what we did. We take entry, beautiful model entry, and we initially see price come up here, and we see good displacement, but ultimately, we come back down. What the issue with this trade here, in my belief now, reflecting back, looking at price, was purely the fact that the stop loss was way too tight. Initially, the TP1 on this trade here was going to be this hourly gap fill, which would have been a 3R. And if you guys know me, obviously, you want a good combination of R, but you also want a good combination of probability. And so, when your stops are as tight as they were, it caused us to get wicked out. We take entry, we see consolidation a lot, and we end up seeing price retrace, essentially, before coming back up here and seeing higher price. Um the break-even zone on this trade here was ideally the 15-minute gap fill because it was a good area of interest where there was a gap to be filled, also near BPR filled, somewhere in the middle, before um our TP1 intent, which was the hourly gap fill. Then, after seeing price trade the way it did, adjusting my TP1 to be this break-even zone, which would have been about 1.2R. But, unfortunately, we do end up getting stopped out. So, for lesson of today, I don't think our bias was wrong. I don't think we had a bad trade, necessarily. I think the stop adjustment is something that we could have definitely done, um being our optimism on the charts, right? Our goal was to see price trade much higher. We could obviously have a bit wider of a stop and still accumulate a very good R. So, 5-minute gap rebalance stop model stop, which was the 5-minute gap um candle wick low, and then we end up seeing price essentially get wicked out. From there, we simply entertain the interest of taking ES off a second potential entry. Again, just because we worked our stop chat, doesn't mean my bias has completely shifted or, you know, my validation of the bull bias because of the fact that price never saw a full reversal off the high. We did end up seeing price come down here. We get stopped out, but we see price build right back up almost immediately after getting stopped out. And so, for me, the reason you see me take a second trade in it be ES over NQ was because of the fact that the 5-minute time frame on ES was trading and printing a lot better than what ES was. So, basing off the 5-minute time frame before the pump up, you see E NQ be a lot more square, right, and a lot more up and down in the consolidation phase that it had here prior to to its next pump up. ES did not, right? ES was more so building back up and we were seeing steady higher lows being formed here and we were seeing price trade a lot closer to its high as opposed to NQ. We eventually end up taking a trade here where the idea was a 5-minute gap go invert, right, being that this is a 5-minute gap right here, bearish gap turn bullish inversion fair value gap. We then take our entry and we see price, you know, essentially confirm right here. Beautiful confirmation. We're initially met with drawdown, but then we eventually come back up and we see price run past into profit. And the unfortunate thing with this trade right here is we came out, what, 75, one tick away from TP being filled, which was a bit frustrating because our TP was a perfect TP, right? It was an hourly gap fill and we see price top off a tick before take profit was filled. So, now, instead of closing out small green on the day, still closing out at minus one hour, which is like $40,000 on the day. A bit frustrating. Obviously, we're still green on the week because we had yesterday and yesterday was a tremendous day. But, we closed out today in a day where we could have easily closed out green had price traded one or two ticks more past the high that it actually put in. So, a bit unfortunate. I will say with both trades combined in terms of a model entry, I did really like both. Both really made sense ideally, but ultimately, both trades, right, did not hit TP and we see price essentially just kind of flattened out. I guess the kind of frustrating part with this day is that we had our bias be right. We wanted to see higher, and that's exactly what we got coming into the close. Um but, we end up seeing price essentially not take out either take profit. So, I will say with the second ES trade, this is a trade although we were tick away, I'm not going to be too upset about. The trade I will be more upset about was NQ because our stop placement could have definitely could have could have definitely been a bit better. And we could have had a bit wider of a stop, um which could have helped us here because again, our content or our consensus with what we wanted to see price do was come up here and reach this hourly gap. So, we didn't need our TP one to be a three-hour, right? We could have had a bit more of a respectable stop. Um we do end up seeing price get wicked out. A combination of a smaller stop and a combination of bad price prows you to get stopped out a bit more, right? It's it's a bit more likely. And then this ES trade here eventually, obviously, um we take, and we see price turn off at tick away. So, a bit unfortunate. I guess the good thing about today is that we're not down a whole bunch, right? We're still green on the week. It's small green with us far, but definitely could have been better a bit a bit better had we seen ES trade a tick or two above past the high. So, a bit unfortunate. That's pretty much the day, and what I learned more so moving forward is in conditions like this, just maybe have a bit more of a wider stop, a respectable stop, and still have your interest cuz again, we see buys validation, but we don't see take profit get hit. So, with that being said, I'm going to wrap it up. That's the review. Let's see how we cook up tomorrow.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZjH1TmhMGJQ" }, { "id": "f8Z39zgWxPw", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$81,000 Day Trading Live! (TEXTBOOK DAY!)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8Z39zgWxPw", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 26, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 1.6, "shared_a_plus_score": 8.4, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1578, "duration_seconds": 572, "chart_count": 14, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 81.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 122.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 163.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 204.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 245.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 285.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 326.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 367.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 408.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 449.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 490.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 530.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/f8Z39zgWxPw/chart_14.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "f8Z39zgWxPw", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$81,000 Day Trading Live! (TEXTBOOK DAY!)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8Z39zgWxPw", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 572, "view_count": 1578, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 10857, "transcript_path": "f8Z39zgWxPw/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 81.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 122.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 163.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 204.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 245.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 285.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 326.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 367.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 408.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 449.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 490.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 530.9 } ], "chart_count": 14, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "orm", "textbook", "short", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "fair value gap", "liquidity", "bias", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "making", "losing", "session", "scalp", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 1.6, "keyword_hits": [ "risk" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 8.4, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "fair value gap", "bias", "confirmation", "session" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:40 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today I'm up over $81,000 day trading live. You can see it right here, the performance card I posted in my Discord, August 10, 2026. And we absolutely capitalized off a beautiful trade today. If you're curious about the trade, here was the trade right here. It was a 1 minute gap short and we took a beautiful short for a good gain. But before I talk about the trade specifically, let's talk about today overall my bias coming into the PM session, why I thought about what I did, and what made me go short, and also what this right here is about. Well, first things first, skipped out on the AM session cuz I had a bit of a migraine in the morning, not bid, a pretty large migraine. Um, it passed then decided to go live at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time where we decided to take a trade. Well, let's price choppy today for the most part. How the hell did you capitalize on a trade? Well, first things first, I think in the morning, had I been on live, had I not had the migrant, and had I traded, I think at best, the morning would have been a break even session for my model, right? So, you know, I made money today, but I'm saying, right, I if I traded AM, it would have been a break even session most likely. The reason I say this is because price did not move much. I see a lot of people on Twitter today who were red, good traders as well who were red today off um the open's price. I did think we see we saw a good opening range move, but we didn't see that full expansion that we usually see in good market conditions. So, for me, coming into the PM session, which was around 1 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, I picked up on something, and that main thing being that price reclaimed back under lows after initially seeing a bullish opening range move reaction. So, we came down here initially taking out overnight lows, but then what you see price do is you see price come right back up after putting in those lows. um therefore causing the bullish move back up. We then end up seeing a rebalance off a large 5m minutee gap where we then come back down and essentially trade lower once we reclaim back lower. I thought it was pretty fair to assume that price could potentially draw lower. And you know, you happen to know there's [clears throat] a clear draw area in this hourly wick low, a large wick on the hourly time frame where I felt price could easily draw into a realistic area of interest with how kind of slow price was. Um, and so for today's instance, I was bearish into the P session again after recognizing the opening range move, um, which was initially bullish, came all the way back down, and we installed new lows paired up with the fact that NQ initially wasn't even the more weaker asset, right? It was ES. We identified that ES was weaker whilst NQ was still weak as well, right? So, caught it coming into the PM session. We identified that and we looked at the higher time frame look paired up with the lower time frame look and more so importantly just purely price today, right? Hourly gap or excuse me hourly um internal draw in terms of this internal wick low paired up with this ES 4hour gap which we saw price eventually come down and trade into. And you see me mention that today, right? What do I say? The first thing I say um for kind of our look come into the session. So about 14 minutes after the uh session or 14 minutes after the live began in our discord, we said liking idea and continuation lower NQ draw level 29564 looks clear. Yes, it's a 4hour gap and it's coming close into that as well. So like as we mentioned that hourly low draw in 29564 paired up with a 4hour gap which I wanted to see price tap into on ES because this 4hour gap was the only gap in sight via higher time frame that was nice and displacive. Um again recognizing price and ES was initially weaker because if you pair the fiveminut you can see that when we did occur and have our opening range move on ES was a lot less significant off the move back up as opposed to NQ which you see a clear push back up initially. So I was kind of eyeing that. But then as we see price trade lower and lower, I was able to identify that there was almost no divergence at all. Comparing price in general between ES and NQ, we were seeing lows, new lows being installed in relative pretty close and we were seeing NQ actually displace a bit better in terms of the sequences. So, one of the first ideas I had in mind here after recognizing higher time frame and the opening range move and the reaction off that um that my bias was bearish and I wanted to see price drawn to 29564 was I looked for a potential short entry. So, now that we have draw bias, now that we have good identification of you know where price is going to lead into and what our sentiment is, now we simply look to be risk by timing our entry. the entry model factor and the confirmation sequence in which we trade is the timing part of our trading. Remember guys, we are scalpers. We trade high leverage in the market. So on that, you know what that means is we have to be able to time our entries because although you could have a specific bias, trading on the one minute time frame, trading on the five-minute time frame, if your timing is not right, you could still get stopped out on a trade and still have your bias be correct. And this is what happened off the first trade had we taken this. This first idea here was a trade that looks like we potentially took. We did not. However, this is a trade I want to go over because not only are winners important, guys, but what's more important in my opinion that gets overlooked is the trades that you do not end up taking. So, this trade idea here was a trade idea presented for potential short and play. That's an idea potential entry a bit higher where we looked for a one minute gap initially looking to rebalance, but then we see price come back up. We see price invert and then we come back down. As you guys know with confirmation, one of the comp components to confirmation is the candle closure. We do require more displacement obviously coming to confirmation, but we had a candle closure. And some people in my chat today were like, Lanto, we technically confirmed. Why didn't you take this trade? Well, like we always talk about, you need to make sure all the boxes are checked off. And so for the confirmation sequence on this trade, it was not ideal because what you end up seeing prior to the rejection candle is you see about five to six green candles in a row print up higher violating the 12 minute gap turning it into a bullish inversion for value app. We then see a rejection initially off the one minute time frame, but it's not a sequence where you see consistent uh engulfing price coming back down. It was one one minute candle. And you guys have to remember within our system, we don't just purely trade a candle closure. That's not what confirmation is. Confirmation is a sequence leading up into the or into the candle closure. And you could see for this trade right here, had we taken it through the natural precise close, which a lot of people would maybe pre prematurely take, you know, we would have gotten stopped out a couple minutes later. And the reason we did not have take end or excuse me, end up taking this trade, although the draw was clear, although the bias was clear, although price was clear on where it wanted to go, we did not get confirmation here. So, we avoided it. and you know all all the boxes were not checked off and we avoided a potential loser. So instead of starting off the session at a minus1R we started off flat break even because we did not end up taking this trade. Then we had our second idea and this second idea was a lot better of a take not just through the entry gap but also through the confirmation sequence as well. If we compare the second idea the second idea was an idea that we based off two gaps um getting violated. So one minute of bullish FEG turns into a bearish fair value gap with confirmation. One minute of bullish FEG gets violated with confirmation. So what we were looking for here after seeing price draw a bit bit higher is we were looking for price to come down here and violate this one minute bullish fair value gap. Turn it into a one minute bearish inversion fair value gap and violate this one minute bullish inversion fair value gap and come back down lower. What's most important with this confirmation sequence chat which check off box was it was not just one candle after seeing this place higher. We initially on this trade right here that had we taken it, we saw price continuously trade up higher and higher through five and six consecutive green candles met by one sell candle here. What you see is you start to see price install lower highs and you're starting to see price install new lows created within the relative range. So we see price come down here and the most important thing is you see a good distribution sequence through the high come back down in a very engulfing candle closure which this candle convincingly tells you that we want to potentially draw back down lower and draw into our target now. Again remember confirmation is your timing setpiece. It allows you to know when the market wants to go. Does it want to go now or does it want to retrace higher first? And we retraced higher here. We then take our entry. We see price come back down here. We go break even stops off this one minute wick low right here. And then we end up seeing price immediately come back down and flush into takerit. You can see the idea posted here. You can see me say I am short. And you can see me say I'm break even where we eventually came down here and smashed our takeprofit goal. A beautiful day because today was not the best price, right? Price off the open was not trading the best and reasonably we've had two days this week which have been underwhelming for the most part, right? And we've been green both days. So very exceptional and I hope this review kind of helps you guys understand the importance of following your system and following your rules and making sure all the boxes are checked off. Took a very good trade and you can see the difference between what a winning trade looks like versus a losing trade. Right? Both trades had similar concepts in terms of exact draw, similar ideas in terms of going break even with tighter stops in place. And we ended up seeing one trade pin and one did not, which we sat out of. So, good day overall. And with that being said, that's the review. Beautiful continuation model trade into draw. Once this low got ran and we got trailed out on the personal, you know, and we realized that TP1, we knew, okay, liquidity was taken here. We there's a potential where we could see a shift back up. If we do so, let it be. We're done. One and0 mindset. Hope you guys enjoyed.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/f8Z39zgWxPw" }, { "id": "wrGyv1Y9PI8", "content_type": "video", "title": "Trading For 5 Hours Today... And Making $0 (Psychology Review)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrGyv1Y9PI8", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 27, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 1.6, "shared_a_plus_score": 8.4, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1233, "duration_seconds": 661, "chart_count": 16, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 82.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 124.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 165.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 206.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 248.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 289.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 330.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 371.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 413.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 454.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 495.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 537.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_14.png" }, { "file": "chart_15.png", "t_sec": 578.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_15.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_15.png" }, { "file": "chart_16.png", "t_sec": 619.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_16.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/wrGyv1Y9PI8/chart_16.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "wrGyv1Y9PI8", "content_type": "video", "title": "Trading For 5 Hours Today... And Making $0 (Psychology Review)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrGyv1Y9PI8", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 661, "view_count": 1233, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 12893, "transcript_path": "wrGyv1Y9PI8/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 82.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 124.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 165.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 206.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 248.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 289.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 330.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 371.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 413.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 454.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 495.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 537.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_15.png", "t_sec": 578.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_16.png", "t_sec": 619.9 } ], "chart_count": 16, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "short", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "take profit", "fair value gap", "bias", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "profit", "making", "losing", "session", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 1.6, "keyword_hits": [ "psychology" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 8.4, "keyword_hits": [ "fair value gap", "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:36 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I came into the markets, and I traded for over 5 hours, made almost no money, took three trades, a break-even trade, a loser, and then a winner. Well, today we'll be talking about exactly what I did, why I took the trades I did, and how I'm okay with accepting the fact that I did not make any money, even though I was in the charts for quite some time. So, here are the two trades which were realized, loser, winner, and here was the break-even trade. But, before we talk about the trades specifically, let's really talk about exactly why I thought about taking three longs today and where my bias came from. Well, first things first, if you zoom out through the higher time frame look as we always do, the first key point of reference that I want to talk about are these two levels that we ended up taking out. We had we had an exit or hourly external low and a 4-hour and daily gap tap. And for me specifically, we wanted to see price come down here and take out this low. We wanted to see this happen since last week. We eventually come down here through the Sunday night open, we see price gap down, then we saw an overnight sequence through Asia deliver a sell into this hourly external low. Not only that, but also tap this 4-hour, which if you look at my chart, right here in the daily time frame, right here, you see price offer that low where we ultimately come back down here, tap, and then see price flourish back up. So, through the higher time frame look, although we had displaced much lower, although we had seen price print much lower, what I wanted to see right was how we would react off this 4-hour and daily fair value gap level take. Because as we always talk about, there are two main key components with identifying reversal in the market. It's A, if it's a bullish reversal like this, a low put in place, what type of low do we put in place in terms of what level did we take out? Was it a higher time frame level? Was it a cheap level? Was it a better level like this, and go based off that. This is obviously an extraordinary level. We see price re-bounce off it. And then most importantly, how do we see price react off it? Which lower time frame comes into mind? What we end up seeing price do coming into the open is you could see before we end up taking our trades, before we had any of that, we waited for the opening range move. Now, the opening range move is always great because it's the timing part to your bias. A lot of times, a lot of ICT traders or traders in general, they have a bias that is more so based upon just previous data. I have a bias that is based off previous data like overnight price, like higher time frame, but I also have a part of mine where it confirms if price wants to go now. How many times have you as a trader came into the day, had a bias, had a correct bias, took a trade, stopped out towards that bias, and then you still see that bias pan out if that makes sense? How many times, you know, for example, you come into the market, you have a say set bull bias or bullish bias, and then essentially what you do is you take a trade, say go long, and you get stopped out, but then you still see your drug get hit, you still see your bias pan out. The opening range move is what helps with the timing aspect. And so, once we end up seeing the opening range move occur here running into London highs, it was clear as day with the lows installed and with the type of displacement that we got off the New York open, it was clear that price wanted to trade higher. So, for me specifically, what I wanted to see price do more so was offer potential entry point here and now after seeing the higher time frame look in the opening range move, I wanted a continuation model trade ride higher. And inside the Discord, you can clearly see that is something we say, right? That's one of the first things that we say in the commentary piece. Um, which we talk about right here, right? Where I say, \"Good lows installed in the 4-hour and daily fair value gap. Entry took its time during London.\" But if New York can continue pace the reversal off the low, run for a higher move. Easy. If we can sustain bullish opening range move, I believe draw is clean through Asia highs plus new week opening gap. Can look to capitalize on grind higher would be a continuation model take if we had. So, this is around the time where price is printing. I can't see what that is. 29007. Right, so right around here is when we started talking about, \"Okay, price could potentially look to trade higher here if we sustain the low.\" What do you know? We end up seeing price rip all the way up to uh to the 29300. So, about a 300-point move off the area that we called. And so, the first trade here after getting getting our components was a continuation model. Look, it was a 5-minute gap rebalance, which is this bigger zone right here, and then a 1-minute gap tap, which is this gap right here, where we we wanted to see price come down, rebalance, right, fill the inefficiency off this gap, and trade back up higher for continuation in the potential of the Asia high. We end up seeing price come down, tap. We eventually ended up taking our entry. My entry comes here, but your actual confirmation's right here. I ended up missing my fill initially. Thankfully, we saw a retracement and a double tap, and then we took confirmation through there. We then see price is actually come up here. Our break-even stance was a closure over highs, so we go break even there. But ultimately, we see price turn around before taking profit. Now, this is very frustrating to me, and I made a reel about this on my socials today, that usually in good good conditions, good markets that thrive, you see price typically go into set draw first try. What I mean by that is you see the opening range move occur here, you see a retracement, and then you see off the retrace price go, right? What price ended up doing today was more so trade in a bit of consolidation. Specifically with ES, you see ES more so look to trade lower. We see ES eventually come down here after the event after the open, dragging down NQ with it. So, although we were on this long, ES was the weaker asset, and we eventually ended up coming back down. This was the frustrating part for me, because I felt like our timing on this right here was beautiful. It was really good, and I still really like this trade. This is probably one of the best non-green trades we've taken in quite some time, as in although this trade did not hit TP, I'm very confident and very much so like this trade. Um because again everything lined up. Unfortunately, again, we ended up seeing price turn around before set draw was taken, ultimately coming back down and stopping us break even. Then we looked on later on into the session and after seeing these Asia highs get taken out, what we wanted to see, going back to the concepts that we talked about, was not only were we targeting Asia highs, but that new week opening gap, which was our Sunday close, or excuse me, yeah, our Friday close to our Sunday open. We wanted to see price trade into that. So, this is new new new week opening gap CE, so which is your 50% point, and this is the complete fill. So, even though Asia highs were taken at set draw off the first trade was initially taken, I still was not completely, you know, off of it. We ended up eventually coming in and looking for a second trade, a similar concept to this continuation look. However, this was a different look and a bad take in my eyes because of the fact that price did not confirm very well off the low. It was very funny because I was on live today and someone asked me a question, like, \"Lanto, why did this trade not work out?\" And I told him, \"There's not enough displacement.\" And what does Lanto go and do? Lanto goes and take a trade just like that, where we see price retrace, and we see price tap a gap and ever so slightly bounce off it, but not with an engulfing sequence. Look at the difference that you see in this confirmation as opposed to this confirmation, right? Two different stories where you see price come down, tap a gap within a couple minutes and immediately bounce. You see price tap it once here, then come back down and tap it again. So, for me specifically, a bit of an unfortunate take because I did want to see price draw higher, but in these markets, what I've been noticing more so than anything else is I've I'm so familiar with continuation in the market and the best type of conditions that Lanto thrives in is when markets are in trending mode. So, for me, I think part of me is typically we have always has that mindset stuck in my mind. It's the same thing with reversal traders who thrive in reversal markets or in range markets. Um they can't typically capitalize the best on trend conditions cuz they just wait, wait, wait for the perfect reversal entry. Uh or get caught up trying to, you know, say we're ripping up to all-time highs, try to short, short, short. That's not me. I like trend and sometimes I'll see those bad habits come out. I've done a good better job personally being able to recognize continuation versus trend versus range. Uh but for today's in this trade here specifically, this is more so me just buying at a severe premium and buying with the not not with the best confirmation. And the reason you see me have so much conviction in this trade, which ends up stopping out, is because I see so much displacement here, right? So, we see price eventually come up here and oh, we eventually do hit draw. And not only that, but we engulf past higher. That tells me, okay, London highs is most likely on um price to come, which is what ended up happening. So, like we talked about earlier, right bias, wrong timing, right? We ended up wanting to see, excuse me, not London highs, but that New York open gap CE get taken out and you see price ultimately do that, but it needed a deeper retracement. So, moving forward, I'm going to do for these continuation looks until markets completely thrive again is I'm going to look for for deeper retracements. I want to stop taking as Unless it's a trade like this where you see trend just start up and we see a reversal just occurring. If we're deep into a trend, especially in these type of conditions, I'm going to look for more deeper retracements than than taking um such premium entries. Um and so, eventually, you know, we get stopped out here. We eventually end up taking a reposition finally, which this is simply a 5-minute gap rebalance. Again, very simple with the entry model, but the ideology is the same. We wanted to see price rebalance and trade higher just like with this trade and with like this trade. But the difference between this last trade chat before this trade is what? We waited for proper retracement. We saw a 5-minute gap CE tapped, not a simple small 1-minute gap get tapped into. We saw a good retracement and we simply waited. We see that price offer the entry where we then take our entry through confirmation. Now, the confirmation sequence wasn't the very best. What's most more so important here is we ended up taking on a much better gap and we ended up taking off a um we ended up taking off a deeper retracement which was good. We actually see price come up here and eventually hit take take profit one which mitigates your loser. For me, I ended up holding um so I'm personally a bit green because I ended up trimming out which I don't typically do but I trimmed out as the position was going more green. I didn't have much time. The PM had to go somewhere so I I ended up closing out um on several prop firms for small profit. On my personal I went break even. uh stops but you see price build up here and eventually this trade peaks out at about a 2R uh before coming back down and eventually trailing you out. So pretty frustrating day because these are one of those days again where our bias was completely right where we had the exact perfect read on what direction was going to be in the market. The only hard part was the timing and my timing lacked today and again, that's nothing to blame. You can't blame the markets. It has to be on yourself. This is Atlanta's fault so that's pretty much that. That's the review and the idea rounding it up or closing it out is stop trading you know, just stop trading in such premium entries. Be a bit more patient with the retracements and just try to get your timing a bit better and that comes through looking at good confirmation sequences, good engulfing patterns um off the gaps as opposed to just oh, we're very bullish, you know, set draws here. That means we're going to take it right now. No, clearly in these markets it's picked it or it's been a lot more picky so yeah, with that being said that's the review. Hope you guys enjoyed it. I'm going to catch you guys in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/wrGyv1Y9PI8" }, { "id": "-7UAZBo1vxo", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$30,000 Day Trading Live (I WAS EMOTIONAL)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7UAZBo1vxo", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 28, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 6.4, "shared_a_plus_score": 7.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 2663, "duration_seconds": 459, "chart_count": 11, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 83.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 125.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 166.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 208.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 250.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 292.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 333.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 375.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 417.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-7UAZBo1vxo/chart_11.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "-7UAZBo1vxo", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$30,000 Day Trading Live (I WAS EMOTIONAL)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7UAZBo1vxo", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 459, "view_count": 2663, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 8841, "transcript_path": "-7UAZBo1vxo/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 83.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 125.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 166.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 208.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 250.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 292.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 333.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 375.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 417.2 } ], "chart_count": 11, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "orm", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "take profit", "sweep", "bias", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "loss", "making", "losing", "session", "nq", "es", "execution" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 6.4, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "stop loss", "invalidation", "psychology" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 7.0, "keyword_hits": [ "bias", "confirmation", "session", "new york", "invalidation" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:37 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm up just shy of $30,000 day trading live. And today was honestly a hectic day. Had two trades, a loss which should have been a winner, and then a winner itself. If you're curious, this was a losing trade on NQ, and then this was the winning trade taken on ES in chronological order. But before we go over the trades, let's talk about our bias, why I ended up taking the trades where I did, and deciding why it was appropriate to go long on both trades. Well, coming into the open, it was pretty clear. If you were here on yesterday's review, you understand that we had a long bias due to a significant low being put in place, more so specifically with NQ being that we ended up taking out a major major area of south side being this hourly wick low. So, for me specifically, coming into today's open, basing off yesterday's bias with a low installed and low kept, paired up with the bullish day that we had yesterday, and paired up with the bullish opening range move that we had today, it was clear through the higher time frame look, I felt it was appropriate that price wanted to trade higher. So, for me specifically, coming into the open, after seeking the bullish opening range move, as we've talked about time and time again, the opening range move allows you to time your part in your bias. The overnight price and the higher time frame look are all previous levels. What you're looking for when it comes to the opening range move is you're looking for a timing aspect to your trading. So, when we see a bullish opening range move, to me, it made clear sense that price could potentially offer a trade where we can look to capitalize. We see a good push off the open again, with these lows installed, with the opening range move, it was clear that we had potential upside draw. The two draw targets on NQ primarily were 29,361 and 29,430. For me specifically, the reason you see us, first of all, take this trade on NQ over ES is due to divergence. If you're able to recognize price coming into this trade, what you're able to see is that you're able to see off the open, ES was actually the asset which was a bit more lagging. How you're able to tell? Well, if you look at price here consistently, you could see off the opening range move that price on NQ was leading the way in terms of the move into buy side paired up with the fact of when we did see the retracement in which we got, we ended up seeing price retrace a bit less on NQ as opposed to ES. For me specifically, we also ended up seeing a bit clearer of a confirmation sequence on this trade confirming on NQ which the entry model was based off a 1-minute gap go invert at 10:00 a.m. We ended up seeing price come up here and confirm this trade right at 10:15 a.m. So, 15 minutes after the gap was created, we ended up taking a stab long. Again, \"Lanto, okay, you took an entry model here, but why specifically?\" It's because everything else was lined up. The higher time frame look with the low being taken out, overnight price and holding up our low that was installed through yesterday's New York. And then also, the opening range move, right? Again, higher time frame, very bullish off the sweep below. You see New York have a very productive and bullish day yesterday. And then you also see a very bullish opening range move hinting the fact that price potentially could see higher interest. Then, once that came, all we wanted to do was time this. So, we looked for a clear entry model in a displace of gap. And this 1-minute gap was primarily the only displace of gap aside from this one that could have offered an entry. We actually ended up coming here and we ended up taking this trade here where we confirm the trade again at 10:15 a.m. We initially go in the money and the initial break even point was this internal high, but I adjusted mentally to a break even off highs. The one thing I will say that should have done a bit better here from my aspect in terms of the execution standpoint, is theoretically, I had a plan and I switched up my break even last second because my fill was a bit higher than I intended. Therefore, causing my trade to go red. We ended up seeing price come down here, but the frustrating part about this trade, as you guys see, is we have a news wick specifically at 10:56 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. This was very frustrating to me because I don't mind when trades stop out for me, especially if they seek good invalidation meaning, you know, for example here, if you were to see price come down, take out stop loss and then trade lower, very fair. But for me specifically, this news candle had no objective. There was no purpose in this news candle doing what it did because right after we have the news sequence, we came right back up and completely blasted to take profit. So when we have wicks like this, it's very frustrating because we just don't have a clear objective. So we come down here, get wicked out, get stopped. And not only that, that was frustrating in itself, but we end up seeing price blasted to take profit. Now, this is the part of the review which I think is very good for y'all who are watching, the psychology standpoint. Most times, a lot of new traders who trade and end up taking a trade like this, usually get very tilted. They get very emotional to what they took, to the stop out they had, and then to seeing their profit target getting smashed a little bit after getting stopped out. Well, for me, I stood patient. I always talk about this day in and day out. The truth is with trading, you either follow your plan and have a chance to make money in the market long-term, or you don't follow a plan, gamble, feed into those emotions, and you never see result. So for me specifically, I knew no matter what, no matter how frustrated I could be, as frustrating as a trade this or as as as as a trade like this could be, I knew to stick to my plan. So, coming afterwards, we ended up looking for a second potential entry after seeing price take out draw levels, but more specifically, take out those draw levels and still showcase very bullish indications in price for drawing higher. For ES here specifically, we then end up entertaining a fact behind taking a long off ES here where we once wanted to go long off of a one-minute gap go in for a long term. This is a very premium entry. It is. But let's say, why do you end up taking this trade? You know, there's other recaps where you take trades and not so much of a premium entry, more actually more so way to look for a trace or deeper trace. Why take this one here? Well, the key aspect is price itself. Price and how we reacted off the draw. So, coming up into the high already, we were already tremendously bullish. We were seeing how engulfing and how bullish price was by consistently trading higher and higher and higher. But most importantly, when we came up here and took out this draw level on this hourly and 4-hour gap fill, we saw price immediately trade up higher. As we talked about with our yesterday bias and as we talked about with our today bias, what do we always talk about when it comes to reversals in the market or with any level would being taken out? For reversals specifically, like we had on the hourly time frame on NQ, what do you want to see price do? You want to see price take out this area of sell side and immediately print right back up. Same ideology with this take profit, this draw level here that we had in mind. We ended up seeing price come up into this high and immediately blast, showcasing a very bullish indication that price wanted to draw higher. Just like when we came down here and took out this hourly low, we wanted to see price draw higher. So, from there, all I simply did was entertain the fact of a potential trade. Simply waited for a retracement. We saw a 1-minute gap being formed here, a bearish gap which we then came back up and immediately inverted. Stop was this 1-minute wick low and the intent for the take profit was this 15-minute gap fill at 7755. Break even was a 5-minute gap fill, small 5-minute gap fill, but a good area of interest to go risk-free. We ended up seeing take profit get take profit one get smashed and ultimately take profit two eventually getting smashed as well later on in the session a couple minutes before I decided to start recording this room review. So, that was pretty much the day. That's the look that I had in the market. A pretty simply simple day, but just those refined details that we talk about consistently and focusing on the small things and refining and being good at our detailed parts of our system, right? And that's all it is, right? Simplicity is key. Make sure if it's simple, you keep it simple. So, with that being said, that's the review. Hopefully you guys enjoyed it. I'm going to catch you guys in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/-7UAZBo1vxo" }, { "id": "9_G9OjsmLaA", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$80,000 Day Trading LIVE (1 loser, 1 winner)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_G9OjsmLaA", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 29, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 3.2, "shared_a_plus_score": 7.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 2206, "duration_seconds": 522, "chart_count": 13, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 80.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 120.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 160.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 200.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 240.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 281.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 321.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 361.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 401.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 441.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 481.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/9_G9OjsmLaA/chart_13.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "9_G9OjsmLaA", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$80,000 Day Trading LIVE (1 loser, 1 winner)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_G9OjsmLaA", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 522, "view_count": 2206, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 10182, "transcript_path": "9_G9OjsmLaA/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 80.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 120.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 160.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 200.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 240.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 281.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 321.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 361.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 401.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 441.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 481.9 } ], "chart_count": 13, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "orm", "short", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "sweep", "bias", "setup", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "making", "losing", "session", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 3.2, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "invalidation" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 7.0, "keyword_hits": [ "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "invalidation" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:57 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Kind: captions Language: en Today, I'm up over $80,000 day trading and in today's review, I'll be going over exactly how I did that. Now, I had two trades. I had a loser and a winner. That's you had a 50% win rate, how could you be green today? Well, let's get it right into it. So, coming into the open, I had a pretty clear idea in what I wanted to do with price or what I what I wanted to see price do as I've had it for the past couple weeks. As you guys could see, through higher time frame, right? What we've done consistently week in and week out for the past couple weeks is you continuously trade higher. So, as we're putting in new highs, as we're seeing higher highs being formed and new all-time highs consistently, in my opinion, as I've said before, there's no reason for me to look to play downside whatsoever. Unless we see price flip off a high and we see large higher time frame invalidation through bullish sequences. So, like if we see higher time frame come down and we see arrays that are bullish get violated and we see bearish arrays get respected, there's no reason for my higher time frame outlook to be downside, right? At this point, trend is your friend. The sentiment in the market is what you should more so look to ride with. That's what I've more so looked to do today. So, we took two trades today. Both were longs, one stopped out and then the other hit for TP. Um for my bias kind of coming into the open, again, nothing too significant via higher time frame, but what I was looking for price to do was I was looking for a retracement off the open. One of the first pieces I mentioned in the morning at around 8:00 a.m., about an hour and a half, an hour and 15 before the market open, I said, \"Good morning, folks. Looking to coming into the open, still floating at all-time highs. I'm bullish naturally do the all-time high price, but would not mind a pre-market {slash} opening range move where we get a retrace fulfilling some influent and inefficiencies, then heading back higher. Or else it'll be a very hard morning for us to work at literal all-time highs. Opening range move into overnight low, a sweep, then a push back to highs would I'd be ideal to continue sentiment with a given entry model. 0.5 R day uh since it's a Monday.\" So, kind of the outlook that I wanted to see price do initially overnight through Asia, we had seen a pretty significant pump where we had seen price come up, fill its new week opening gap, and then we had seen price come up and trade into new all-time highs. What I wanted to see price do was kind of come down here, retrace into overnight lows giving a potential in interest drawing a higher. Because I wanted to see price come down, I wanted to see price take out its southside, that way we have no chance or a very low probability of price coming down and needing to trade into these overnight lows. If we come down, we take these lows and we sweep back up, it makes total sense if you were to come back up and see a push back up. So, that was kind of the incentive with what I wanted to see price do off the open. Again, kind of a lower time frame move lower, like a shorter move lower for a longer term push back up. What do we do? Well, coming into the open, we see price essentially slowly but surely um come back down here and we see price come down and sweep these lows. A pretty hectic morning to start off the session cuz we had some significant divergence via the open. NQ was a lot weaker as opposed to ES being a lot more bullish. How could you tell? Well, if you look at the open and you see what we did, NQ ends up taking out its Asia low, which was below its London low at around 9:45 a.m. Eastern Standard Time, and you never see ES end up taking out its Asia low. ES only ends up taking out its London low after, right? Around when um NQ ends up taking out its Asia low, right? So, um or NQ takes out its London low at 9:30, right? You could see off the open here, 9:30, and ES only ends up taking that out 15 minutes later. So, there's your bit of divergence. You could say ES was lagging whatsoever or whatever you want to say, but it's clear that NQ was by far the weaker asset. Now, we had seen price come down here and we essentially wanted to see price take out overnight lows. We happened to do that. From there, we just waited for a potential sweep. Then, we eventually got that. We saw beautiful push into this low. Then, we came back up, saw a bit of a sweep. Initially, price to lot looked a lot better than what had or what it offered eventually. And so, the first trade that I was looking to potentially take was a long. If I show you kind of the setup and what I was looking for price to do, this was not one of those. Um the setup was right here. The first take of the day was this potential ORM happened bullish reaction eyeing this potential. You see me point at a potential 1-minute gap go invert entry, but it was more so a 1-minute bullish gap retrace that we wanted to see price tap into. We happened to take our entry. Our stop was based off our model stop utilizing the candle wick open on the 1-minute gap for the bullish gap. Kind of two different arrays in one here. The reason I was able to use model stop here is because we had enough room in between entry to stop to where it gave the trade breathing room. You then see me mention I am long. We take the trade. However, we start to see price consolidate. This, in my opinion though, was a very good setup. Believe it or not, although we had two trades, the first trade, this trade here, was a loser and the second one was a winner. I like this trade in terms of a more technical aspect than the second trade, believe it or not. Like crazy enough, right? Lance, what the hell? Yeah, I said that, right? First trade, which was a loser, I like better as a take than I did the second trade. Although the second trade panned out, the reason it did is because we had more structure and price eventually started to pick up. This, however, just kind of consolidated and chopped up and we see price come down here and eventually take out stop. From here, we were down half an hour as today's a half hour risk day, and we end up seeing price essentially consolidate, consolidate, consolidate. We don't end up taking out a second or taking a second trade until the PM part of the session. Now, before I go over the second trade, I think it's important to make sure that you guys understand the patience that was required in order to get to this point. People overlook this severely. You guys have to remember, obviously you can make money in the stock market, but what's more important, people that don't over people that overlook consistently, is that you have to save money as well. In between this first and second trade, a lot of traders would tilt out, get emotional off a stop like this and continue to continuously re-enter, re-enter, re-enter. After this initial entry, price was bad for a good time, right? A good bit of time as we see NQ consistently chop and consolidate here, but then we eventually get the setup in where we go long on an ES 5-minute gap go invert. But remember, we end up getting stopped out on this trade all the way at around when I mentioned the Nody, right here. 10:30 a.m. is when I get stopped out and I don't end up taking another trade all the way until later is when I took. People overlook this. This hour and a half of me waiting till the next setup, it's on purpose, right? You need patience in order to get to this, right? Because the moment you start to force it and just take stuff that isn't going to fit your model, that's how you put yourself in a hole and that's how a trade like this doesn't really do much for you. But for today, it did a lot. It put us from red to green. This trade here was a 5-minute gap go invert. We had seen price come down. We initially see ES come down here, take out London lows. We then see ES come back down and we see price take out this low creating a new low of day, then a sweep back up. Clear in range trend trend or excuse me, in range day. We had seen price come up and we simply look for on the or we look for ES to go invert off its 5-minute gap. We eventually get that and here is the trade. The trade on ES was right here. 5-minute gap go invert. A beautiful 5-minute gap go invert confirmation on this trade here through the Discord as they took with me live was at 11:59 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. I mentioned I am long right here. Boom. Everyone knows. And I said, \"Thumbs up if confirmation for you was 11:58,\" which I meant to say they do it, right? They they bagged, right? They did really well. That's This is stuff I like seeing in the Discord more than anything else. I don't care how much anyone's up. If people are really understanding how this works and how our trading works, that's all I care about. Um cuz once you learn how to do this on your own and you don't need me, that's where you hit That's where you hit jackpot, right? Once you learn the skill set. We eventually go break even stops off high of day. Our target of interest was Asia highs. It was a slow trade, but we eventually got it. The importance again of patience, not only did it require patience between trade number one and two, that hour and a half that we waited, but it also required patience holding this trade. This trade was about a couple hours long as well. A pretty tough hold, right? We end up taking this trade at 12. We end up holding this trade until close. So, about a 3-hour whatever, 4-hour trade. A pretty tough trade, but again, if you have your patience, it's always there. I end up going down from around $36,000 to have a $67,000 trade. This is just my live account. Include prop firms. Did really well closing out phenomenal on the day. TPTs up really solid. And yeah, so a beautiful session overall. Again, recognition of range, recognizing that price is not the best right now. We simply waited and were patient and we eventually got the second technical setup was a which was a sweep of low of day and then a push back up. So, that's pretty much that. That's the review. Hope you guys enjoyed it and onto the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/9_G9OjsmLaA" }, { "id": "-K3bVtMMnKU", "content_type": "video", "title": "Losing -$79,000 Day Trading (ROOKIE MISTAKE)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K3bVtMMnKU", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 30, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 3.2, "shared_a_plus_score": 7.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1729, "duration_seconds": 565, "chart_count": 14, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 80.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 121.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 161.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 201.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 242.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 282.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 322.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 363.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 403.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 443.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 484.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 524.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/-K3bVtMMnKU/chart_14.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "-K3bVtMMnKU", "content_type": "video", "title": "Losing -$79,000 Day Trading (ROOKIE MISTAKE)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K3bVtMMnKU", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 565, "view_count": 1729, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 10571, "transcript_path": "-K3bVtMMnKU/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 80.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 121.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 161.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 201.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 242.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 282.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 322.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 363.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 403.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 443.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 484.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 524.5 } ], "chart_count": 14, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "orm", "long", "stop", "target", "liquidity", "sweep", "bias" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "p&l", "profit", "loss", "losing", "nq", "es", "execution" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 3.2, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "drawdown" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 7.0, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "bias", "london", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:43 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm down over $76,000 day trading live, and it sucked losing 76k in front of 600 plus people, but I'm here to review it. And these were the two losses that we ended up taking on live today, [music] which caused my losing day. It sucked. Definitely did. Felt really bad about it. Um but at the end of the day, it's trading, and it's one day at a time. Before I go into the entries and I talk about why I took the trades where I did, let's go over my bias. Let's go over what I thought about and why I assumed putting risk on where I did was appropriate. Starting off higher time frame, what you could see is that we had clear interest in driving up higher. How do we identify that? Well, we identify that through looking at overnight price trading at a bullish state, and then we look at higher time [music] frames being we have clear imbalances towards the upside after this large displacement back up. Hourly time frame prints back up. We have a clear new week opening gap to fill, and what I wanted to see price do was come up and surely do that. We do end up seeing that new week opening gap get filled, but that's the literal high that was put in place. Zooming down to the 15-minute time frame after looking at your higher time frame narrative, what I wanted to see was the opening range move. And with ES and NQ here, ES precisely off the open, the reason you see me go ahead and be risk on on ES today as opposed to NQ [music] is because of the fact that ES was much more leading. And so, how do you tell? Well, if you look at price here through the open, you could see clear divergence through the open based upon the 5-minute or even the 1-minute time frame here at your 9:30 a.m. open, we see large displace come back up on ES, and you see a good drive into your London high. That is our opening range move on ES. But, NQ does not end up causing its opening range move all the way until we take out London lows. So, at 9:39, 6 minutes after ES took out London highs, we see NQ take out London lows. So, some extreme divergence there between ES and NQ as ES takes out the high and NQ takes out the low. So, we were aware of that and what we decided to do was still play into that long bias on ES, but here's the thing that caused me to stop out today. One of the main instances was the divergence. The first trade that we ended up taking here after recognizing that higher time frame was bullish through looking at displacement on the hourly time frame. Simply put, keeping it simple, seeing these arrays get violated, and seeing this new week opening gap being wide open, the main factor behind this first trade and the reason this trade lost was because of the fact that we had massive divergence. And we had the weaker asset not take out the liquidity required before taking this trade. Just prior to entering this trade, you could see me post the idea in mind. I said potential long in play. >> [music] >> ES leading, good 5-minute gap rebalance. Idea here is continuation higher. Target 7636. NQ bearish. What would be What made this A+ is if NQ swept Asia lows. Left it open with a couple points to go. So, admittedly, I said we're essentially not taking an A+ trade here, being slightly impatient. And that was because at the time of this entry, NQ had bottomed off a low here, which was a couple ticks a couple points away from taking out Asia low. Now, although we had some supreme divergence off the open, which was the main reasoning behind the loss on the first trade, this was also a main reason here as well. What we should have done here is we should have waited. Instead of waiting or instead of taking our longs and taking this ES trade, we should have waited for price to come down and we should we should have waited for price to take out Asia lows. And I do end up saying that on live. However, I still decide to be risk on. We see price essentially come back up here and through displacement, I was convinced that we see price drop higher. But here's the thing, let's go. Liquidity wasn't taken. I know. That was simply be simply me being impatient today. And although we've been very patient for the week so far, right? We've been break even the past 2 days for the most part. And you specifically with yesterday we had, you know, we were online for a couple hours and did didn't end up taking any trades. Today, I was a bit more impatient. In these market conditions with how bad price has been, the only way you'll you'll be able to make money in these conditions is by seeing simply being extremely patient. And that's what we felt today. Although we were naturally patient and a bit more patient than usual in in usual markets just because we don't require that patience, we were still not patient enough in these conditions. Had we simply waited for Asia lows to be taken out here prior to entering any type of trade, this long here would have been completely mitigated and this would have been never taken. So, this first loss here was based off a 1-minute gap go or 1-minute gap rebalance off this area of it just right here alongside this 1-minute gap rebalance here. We end up violating this gap, but simply rebalanced off the bigger gap here, then taking entry, going risk-free stops at high of day once taken, and our target one interest at 7636. Here's a way to tell that price is also bad. Look at ES with this first trade. What is the rarity that you see the leading asset come up here and tease this high of day by a tick? Very rare. We then see price come back down and we see price showcase interest in lower. This really put me off because if price is bullish if price is seeking bullish displace off the rebalance that it did on the 5-minute gap right here, what you would want to see price do at minimum is take out that New York high and see some type of liquidity ran after all this displacement back up. We do not end up seeing that. >> [music] >> So, get stopped out. In terms of the second trade here, this second trade isn't as bad because this second trade ends up coming after the sweep of or excuse me, after the take of Asia lows. We see price come down here at around 10:21 a.m. We see price eventually come down and take out that Asia low. Therefore, you see me spark up interest in potentially taking a long yet again on ES. This time it was a 1-minute gap go invert. What I wanted to see truthfully prior to this maybe is a sweep of this New York low, then a push back up. We do not end up seeing that. We see price come back up, therefore be requiring a bit more displacement. I look for this one minute gap here that was displacive. We eventually come up here, we take entry, stop the route of flow. Ideology is same, break even stops at high of day, target one being 7636. We come in and almost immediately we head into drawdown. And again, this is simply impatience because you see NQ the whole time not necessarily showcase interest in driving back up. Although divergence is wide, although we were seeing a ES lead supremely NQ, you know, be a lot more bearish. What you don't want to do is take a long that's not certainly printing the same way on the other asset. Right? All I wanted to see price all I all I would have taken here on a normal day had I been a bit more patient is had we seen a true sweep of this low. We did not see that. We ended up taking the second trade prior that occurrence, therefore resulting in us coming down here and ES taking these lows out. The divergence is what caused these two trades to get stopped out. First trade was a junction of the Asia lows not being taken on NQ leaving wide open draw for sell side and the divergence and this trade on the second take was purely divergence. [music] So moving forward, what I've learned from today, simply put, is I need to be back to being, you know, significantly patient and being that, you know, being at that 100% patience that we usually have. And I just to simply did not use that today. And these were pretty much rookie mistakes if we're being honest, right? With sell side being wide open, there should be no take. With the divergence being as as wide as it was, especially with no indication of reversal back off the low sweep, there should be no take. This right here, these two trades, ideally in an A+ day >> [music] >> in terms of my execution, should have not been taken. Right now we should be break even. And for anyone who's watching this live review right now in chat, the real honest truth is this week so far should be a week where we've taken zero trades thus far. Yesterday was dog Today was pretty bad. Monday was pretty bad as well. At best this week is a break even week. That's how conditions are and that's how they've been as of recent. And I want you guys watching this video understand this. You see me, even I have a losing day, losing stretch. And I need you guys to know it's important. That's how trading is. For me, I don't mind taking these losses, don't mind having losing days like this. Although obviously I could fix it up, improve and get better. I don't mind necessarily having losses like this because of the fact that I know no matter what, if I continue to follow my system and just that, I will be profitable over the over the course of time. It's happened over and over again through the course of this year, through the course of last year and for the bulk of my profitability since I became profitable. >> [music] >> You will have losing stretches, you will have winning stretches. The important and the only difference between a good trader and a bad trader is a good trader knows how to maximize on those winning conditions and they know how to minimize on those losing conditions. So although we're down two trades today, although I'm down $76,000 today, it could always be worse. And I think it's good to call your day for what it is and simply move on because although we're red today, you could always always always have it worse. So when these winning conditions come back, when conditions and price really set up step up again and price trades well, you'll see me have reviews that post P&Ls that are significantly higher. You'll see the Rs be significantly higher. And for people in the Discord, you'll see what I mean as it's happened time and time and time again with us on live. You'll see within a couple trades, maybe within a couple days, all these losses that we, you know, we're potentially taking get mitigated almost instantly. So until then, we remain patient. I know today stung, but we simply move on and take the day for what it is. Let's go.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/-K3bVtMMnKU" }, { "id": "oNyv2ET4EUo", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$64,000 Day Trading in 1 Hour!", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNyv2ET4EUo", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 31, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 1.6, "shared_a_plus_score": 7.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1707, "duration_seconds": 397, "chart_count": 9, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 44.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 88.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 132.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 176.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 220.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 264.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 309.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 353.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/oNyv2ET4EUo/chart_09.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "oNyv2ET4EUo", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$64,000 Day Trading in 1 Hour!", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNyv2ET4EUo", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 397, "view_count": 1707, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 8136, "transcript_path": "oNyv2ET4EUo/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 44.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 88.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 132.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 176.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 220.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 264.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 309.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 353.2 } ], "chart_count": 9, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "orm", "short", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "take profit", "sweep", "bias", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "making", "losing", "session", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 1.6, "keyword_hits": [ "risk" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 7.0, "keyword_hits": [ "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:42 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm up over $60,000 day trading live in front of my Discord, and this is the trade that made me that earnings. Prop accounts, funded accounts, live accounts, all of that combined in one, and the return on investment for today's trade was $64,000. Now, before I talk about the trade, let's talk about my bias. Let's talk about why I thought the way I did. Let's talk about why I decided to take the trade where I did, simply put, and why it succeeded. Well, starting off on the hourly time frame, look what you could have is a look at price through the sell. So, we had a pretty promising overnight session sell, specifically through London, where we saw a tremendous push down. And through the hourly time frame, coming into the open, or a bit after coming into the open as well, we had taken out a 4-hour gap, which we had seen price come down here, tap into it, and then raid. On top of that, we had also taken out some internal sell side, and which got taken. And the reaction in that internal sell sell side being taken out is what's caused me, or what caused me to be a bit more bearish than I naturally already was. As we always talk about a lot of times, a great indication to tell whether price is true to sentiment, or true to the direction that it's seeking right now, is through the reaction that takes of highs and lows. And for this instance, this is an hourly gap, or excuse me, an hourly low, right? So, this is a higher time frame look. And what do you see price do? Well, initially on the hourly time frame, you see price come up and potentially sweep back up. But what do what do you see price then do? You see price essentially come back down, and you see a beautiful sell past that low. So, instead of looking for reversal off that low, what does that low do? We see price retrace, come back down, and we see price engulf back below. That was indication number one. On top of that, paired with it, you have your London session sell, looking at overnight price. You see that price overnight has a tremendous sell into from London specifically into New York open. And so, with this large sell, for me, sentiment's very easy and clear once price does something drastic coming into a New York session. Uh to To off with last night specifically, we had it a new day opening opening gap get created. We had seen NQ come up here, fill it, trade a bit back trade trade a bit past the new week day or new day opening gap fill, excuse me. Then we see price come down, we see price settle and consolidate for a bit, and then once taking out that low, we do see an initial reaction, but then see price meet right back down for a tremendous sell in the market. For me, I feel sentiment in the market when you see a higher time frame look like this low being taken out, and this overnight sequence traded a bearish day is a very good indication that price could potentially draw lower into lower sell side. So, referencing this hourly time frame again, we took this hourly low out, and then we had seen price come back up, then ultimately come back down. But what's important here is you see price once we take out this low, we have clear area of sell side and to mark out here. And one of the key areas of interest was this hourly level low, and this internal low here as well. After that, you would shoot for that hourly external low. So, for me coming into the open, all I needed to see was a good opening range move sequence. Well, off the open, we had seen price come down here and take out our London low, which was your opening range move. We then see price come up here, and we see price ultimately drive back up initially for a higher retrace. But clearly on the Discord, if you were there, we talked about the instance of staying staying bearish regardless of anything, and that was the main reference pointing out to price overnight. So, with the overnight sell, with the hourly time frame look, for me in order to flip bullish here, I would need a lot of displacement. I would need a good statement made in price before looking for a reversal higher. So, with the low that we had put in, although we had taken out London lows, and this is your considered opening range move, I don't think this is a very significant low that we we were putting in. So, off the batch off New York open, I know we were seeing an initial push up here, but the reason you don't see Lant will be risk on is because it's going against his already bearish bias, and if you were to flip bullish, there was just not enough here to work with. So, instead, what we ended up seeing price do was come up here, and we had seen a 15-minute gap tap alongside a 30-minute gap tap, which is pretty significant because you see price retrace off the open, you see a significant rebounds in the market, and then you see price ultimately come back down. So, for me and my interest for taking this trade here, what I wanted to see price do was I wanted to see price showcase displacement into a potential entry confirmation. Now, Lento, you were risk on here, right? Yes. Again, referencing why I was risk on where I was here as opposed to early off the open potentially playing higher is because we had all of our components lined up. Our bias was downside, and after the initial pump up, we had seen the rejection back down playing back into that bias. We stuck with it, had two first attempts which were both went break even, two beautiful trades that were in the money instantly, but then ultimately came back up, never saw full interest. And then ultimately, this third trade right here was the trade that panned out into take profit, which was a 1-minute gap entry with our stops throughout of high, break even once low of day got ran, and then our take profit interest being 28578. We did have interest in the hourly external low, which we came close to, but we ultimately trailed stops, and we simply moved it on from there. [clears throat] I want to quickly show you guys the visual of this, right? We end up posting the alert here, potential take in mind. Then you end up seeing me mention that I am short, break even stops off low of day 28640. Same target as last take, 28578. You eventually see me say, \"We go break even risk.\" Then we ultimately smash take profit. Then where we eventually trail our stops to that TP1 once we displace back down low enough. So again, just a reminder, three components, bias, price action entry model. So bias is clear, especially once we saw the opening range move event eventually come back down and reject off that 30-minute gap entry. And then specifically with this entry model, this wasn't the first entry model I took all day, right? It wasn't the first entry precisely, but it was the entry that went. We took two break even trades as mentioned earlier on. This trade right here specifically was successful because we had seen good displacement back down and a good confirmation sequence. The best confirmation sequence out of all three trades that we had today. And this is the trade that pans out for a 1.3R. So a simple beautiful day where I made consistency and realized profit on my all my accounts closing me out for $64,000 a day. I will say had we hit TP2 here and I realized I probably would have been up over I don't know what the exact would have been probably around 130. But you guys have to realize just because we get trailed out here it's not the worst thing in the world. Sure I was up you know two times as much as I was at realization but you have to remember these markets are thin they're very internal they don't move the best so take the day for what it is and the reason I'm still the one and only mindset is because realistically you only get one or two good A+ trades a day that really aligned if that. And so when we have a set up like this perform and execute and line up nicely take her day for what it is and simply move on right give yourself time stretch that out and simply compound over and over again. With that being said that's a review a quicker one but a more effective one. Hope you guys enjoyed it I'm going to catch you guys in the next review. Peace out.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/oNyv2ET4EUo" }, { "id": "5D7ApbW96bo", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$73,000 After Initially LOSING (Risk Management 101)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5D7ApbW96bo", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 32, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 6.3, "shared_a_plus_score": 7.0, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1371, "duration_seconds": 659, "chart_count": 16, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 82.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 123.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 164.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 205.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 247.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 288.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 329.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 370.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 411.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 453.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 494.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 535.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_14.png" }, { "file": "chart_15.png", "t_sec": 576.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_15.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_15.png" }, { "file": "chart_16.png", "t_sec": 617.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_16.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/5D7ApbW96bo/chart_16.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "5D7ApbW96bo", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$73,000 After Initially LOSING (Risk Management 101)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5D7ApbW96bo", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 659, "view_count": 1371, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 12754, "transcript_path": "5D7ApbW96bo/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 41.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 82.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 123.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 164.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 205.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 247.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 288.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 329.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 370.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 411.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 453.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 494.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 535.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_15.png", "t_sec": 576.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_16.png", "t_sec": 617.8 } ], "chart_count": 16, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "orm", "short", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "take profit", "sweep", "bias", "setup", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "profit", "loss", "making", "losing", "session", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 6.3, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "risk management", "fomo" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 7.0, "keyword_hits": [ "bias", "confirmation", "session", "london", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:42 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm up over $73,000 in the trading day. And today was an awesome trading day. Not because I won and made a lot of money, but more so because I took a loss and I came back and still closed out green. Here were the two trades I took today. Took a loser, and took a winner. And today was a day I was very proud about because it showcased our system and what the importance of being patient and not emotional does for you as a trader. So, coming into the open, we end up seeing a pretty nice sell. Similar yesterday, we had a pretty productive move coming down into our overnight lows, which where then we saw a push back down but below it. Pretty consolidated overnight session. My bias coming into the open was short. I wanted to see price go down lower. However, unlike yesterday, yesterday we came in, had a new week opening gap fill, which we had seen price tap perfectly after committing into an entry. Today, missed my entry twice. I had two short set up and I missed my entry on both takes, resulting in me to miss the move down, be patient and look for a move later on in the session. If you could see through the Discord notice, you could see one of my first things I did mention for today was bearish opening range move with higher time frame is looking like I like potential lower draw. Hourly gap fill being 27724. Would like an entry model for us to to ride continuation lower. So, at 9:38 a.m. Eastern Standard Time, what I pretty much said is with our bearish opening range move here, with price off the opening coming down into our overnight low and seeing that low being taken out and most importantly the reaction paired up with your higher time frame look naturally leaning bearish. The reason I was bearish higher time frame, I didn't overcomplicate it. What we had seen yesterday was a tremendous sell down on the hourly time frame, on the four-hour time frame, on the daily time frame. And all I looked at was price and structure. There wasn't anything too significant here, but the fact that we had seen a tremendous sell back down met by consolidation through overnight. Overnight price did not showcase one instance of potential reversal back up higher and on top of that we had clear sell side targets back down in the case price through New York wanted to see lower. And what do we see price through New York opening range move do right off the open? Well, you see price come down here and you see price commit into its overnight lows, London low, and Asia low for NQ and you see price have a very bearish reaction even once taking out that low. Had we seen a sweep of the low, had we seen price showcase bullish bullish instance after taking that that low, you would have not seen me be as bearish as I was. But being that our higher time frame look, which was simple, identifying clear structure clear displacement back down, and then clear structure overnight, which was not showcasing interest in reversal due to the fact that we didn't have our two components when it comes to reversals. A being it's a significant or significant low being put in place, and B being that we see large displacement off the low. We did not see any of that last night, therefore causing me to believe that in the case we saw price come down here and so showcase the bearish opening range move, we would see lower and we would see lower now. We see price come down here and we see price again showcase good interest past lower, therefore causing me to have interest in taking short. Our first idea of the morning was this, a potential short. Somebody yesterday may take up to one or two tries, but conviction in lower price into draw is high. Looking for entry model here. So I was looking for a potential one minute gap retest. This is a very similar trade that we ended up taking yesterday where we had recognized how bearish price was and all we wanted to do was simply see a small retrace to enter a continuation model trade riding lower. We did not see price ultimately offer a potential entry later on, but I see price or more so what happened here was I missed my entry. And pretty much what I said, because a lot of you guys in chat did end up taking the trade, is I said miss my fill, but if you know my confirmation or you know the confirmation you caught that. And a lot did in chat, so congrats to y'all. I'm now looking at the one minute one minute gap rebalance for entry. So, my draw, as I mentioned earlier coming into the open, recognizing the bearish opening range move with all other components through our bias, was 27724. That was right here. This is an hourly gap fill that I wanted to see price come down and to trade into once we had seen a bearish opening range move. Trade number one, which I wanted to see price ride short down into, I missed. It was a beautiful short had we taken off this gap right here where we had seen good and tremendous follow through lower. Then, we simply ended up waiting a bit more where we ended up looking for a retracement into a one minute gap imbalance, looking for price to come down here and violate. So, kind of a two gap confluence here where you have A, a bearish gap rebalance, which is a bearish confluence, and then you have B, a bullish gap getting violated and inverting, which is a bearish confluence as well. We eventually come down here and we see price kind of stutter a bit off of our entry point, but we eventually end up providing that entry where we then take short off confirmation. We take the trade and we see price for the most part initially chop up, but then we eventually go risk free. I go break even here after seeing price actually come up here and close or come close to us stopping us out. Then, we see price come back down and we see good fluidity and movement and draw um trading lower. The unfortunate thing here is with our TP being the 30 minute BPR fill, which was below the hourly gap, we did not see price do that. We saw more so price trade at a state of content and wanted to trade at a state where we more so structured out before seeing our next move of distribution. We end up seeing that here. We end up going break even, and instead of being a whining, complaining, \"Oh, I missed my short. I would have been up a lot of money had I simply, you know, held it through or had I simply got my entry.\" We stayed patient and we waited. We recognized, you know, sometimes you will miss your entries, and we simply remained calm and waited until price cleared up again. The most important thing, I think, which has helped me as a trader when it comes to identifying or more so being more productive as a trader, is being okay with not needing to know what every single move will be in the market. So, after this consolidation here, it wasn't like I was trying to enter a trade immediately after. I simply waited. I recognized that price was choppy, and you see me mention that after getting stopped out break even. Break even. This is a now this is now purely chopping. We had recognized that price was at a state of consolidation, and instead of FOMOing back in because we had missed short, we simply waited. We then saw price structure out and put in a good low. More specifically with ES putting in a low off its Asia low. ES came down here and our low of the day through New York was put through taking out and sweeping our overnight lows. Like we talked about earlier, two great ways to identify market structure shift and reversal. You want to see a good low being put in a significant low, and you want to see clear displacement off the low. And we end up getting that here. So, we see price come down, put in a good low, Asia low, see structure build up, and then we eventually see price start to pick up again, and ultimately see that move up higher. We then flip narrative. Instead of marrying buys, recognize price for what it is, and we simply looked to entertain longs. But, we wanted to see price pick up first. And we eventually end up seeing price pick up right around where we ended up taking our first trade, which was a 1-minute gap imbalance retest. Now, this trade right here specifically was taken off a very premium entry, and the idea behind this trade, the ideology was that we were to see price slowly retrace, come back up, and look for a higher draw. Here's the thing and the reason this trade had stopped out. We ended up realizing model stop on this trade. A, stop was a bit too tight for what conditions were at this point in time. Although we were seeing reversal, price still was not A plus. Um mind the stop, you don't really necessarily have to blame the stop here entirely, but more so what I blame it is on myself and being a bit impatient. This is a premature take. Someone asked this earlier to me on live. They're like, \"Al Lato, how do you identify premature takes versus good takes?\" Simply retracements. If you look at in hindsight where we took this trade, this trade was a trade taken at a very premium entry, meaning we took this trade at a very high spot of where price was currently trading at. And you see this eventually take this trade here. Our target of interest was an internal wick high. TP2 was London high. But what you don't end up seeing is a proper retracement before seeing price draw up higher. Now, you guys know in reversals, I love waiting for retracements because typically reversals offer that because you're going against the grain, you're going against the pivot, and you're looking for a price to draw up higher through a reversal. And in during reversals or reversal sequences, price isn't as powerful off the initial creation back up then as it is as, you know, trend is moving forward, if that makes sense. So, we end up seeing price retrace here as expected because it's a reversal sequence. And instead of waiting, we end up getting caught up off our first take, which was a one-minute gap rebalance off one, two, three gaps that I combined in one. We end up seeing price come up here and do confirm nicely off the gap, but it wasn't the right entry criteria to take because it was such a premium entry. We then wait, and then simply put a little bit afterwards after waiting for that retracement in the market and seeing price showcase a move down, then a move right back up indicating a higher low being formed and indicating a potential reversal back higher. I wanted to see price potentially invert the swing of gap, which was also inside a one-minute gap as well, where we could see price draw up higher and see price trade up higher. We eventually end up coming here and we eventually end up doing that as you see me mark out after getting stopped out at the first trade, the ideology behind taking this setup. And you eventually end up seeing me say taking my fill here, 28848. We take entry. Our break even stops is around the high because we had known that this is not a continuation trade. This is a reversal trade still, right? So, when you play reversal, like I said earlier, um you're playing against sentiment, which is a lot harder to see strong directional um movement. So, you want to be tight with your risk here. One break even off the high take, and then we eventually see price immediately push back up. And we see price hit target one, which was a 1.7R, meaning our loss was a minus 1R, and our take profit one interest here was 1.7, meaning you you you made back your loss, and you're up at 0.7R. Take profit two was London highs. We end up seeing price come up here, and we see take profit take profit two get smashed, which this right here at this point was at 2.5R. Now, through two trades, we've had a 50% win rate today. We lost, and we won. However, we're up at 1.5R because our winning trade was over two times bigger than our losing trade. And this is the power of risk management that I say time and time again. When you follow your system, and for me specifically, when I follow my system, and I remain patient, although I missed the short off the morning, although I got stopped out on a long on a clear directional move back up through our bias, I still stuck to my plan. I did not go away from it. I did not shy away from it. I didn't FOMO. I didn't feed into emotions. I stuck to my plan, and I kept moving forward. We eventually end up taking the trade, like I said, we see beautiful take profit get smashed ultimately, and end up getting trailed out off this trade here once trailing out very tight to its London high. So, beautiful sequence overall, and I hope you guys can see the importance of following your risk system through this video, and most importantly, remaining patient and not feeding into your emotions. With that being said, that's the review. Hopefully you guys enjoyed it. I'll catch you guys in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/5D7ApbW96bo" }, { "id": "NkbZmrwUy3M", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$115,000 Day Trading in 1 Hour! (TEXTBOOK MODEL)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkbZmrwUy3M", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 33, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 1.6, "shared_a_plus_score": 5.6, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 3104, "duration_seconds": 632, "chart_count": 15, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 42.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 84.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 126.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 168.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 210.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 253.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 295.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 337.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 379.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 421.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 463.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 506.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 548.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_14.png" }, { "file": "chart_15.png", "t_sec": 590.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_15.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/NkbZmrwUy3M/chart_15.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "NkbZmrwUy3M", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$115,000 Day Trading in 1 Hour! (TEXTBOOK MODEL)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkbZmrwUy3M", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 632, "view_count": 3104, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 11805, "transcript_path": "NkbZmrwUy3M/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 42.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 84.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 126.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 168.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 210.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 253.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 295.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 337.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 379.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 421.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 463.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 506.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 548.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_15.png", "t_sec": 590.3 } ], "chart_count": 15, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "orm", "textbook", "long", "stop", "target", "take profit", "fair value gap", "sweep", "bias", "setup", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "loss", "making", "losing", "nq", "es", "execution" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 1.6, "keyword_hits": [ "stop loss" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 5.6, "keyword_hits": [ "fair value gap", "bias", "london", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:45 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm up to shy of $115,000 on the trading day, and today was a textbook model day. And this is the exact trade I took, which made me $115,000. But before we go over the trade, let's talk about my bias. Let's talk about why this is textbook and why I really like this setup. So, starting off, bias. Well, if you look at higher time frame narrative here, coming into the open, price wasn't too too clear. Overnight price and higher time frame was at a pretty consolidated state here. We initially saw a good pump a couple days prior through the state of Monday's price and then through the state of Tuesday's Tuesday's price. Um but coming into the open, since price is so consolidated and we weren't seeing price do much, there was no clarity in what we wanted to do, but what we did do is mark out some important arrays, which we did see price trade into. First things first, recognizing overnight price. If you look at the state of ES and NQ, what you're able to see is you're able to see that NQ was much more weak in this sell through overnight price than um ES was, right? And actually we had come back come back down. And you see the state of ES here coming into the New York open, but specifically with overnight price through Asia and through London, what you see um price do is you see price just drive down a lot better. How are you able to tell that? Well, look at the gauge through our overnight highs and lows. Look at the state of Asia through ES, London through ES, and look at the state of um Asia and London through NQ. You see NQ off the low London high creation create a much more significant lower high right off the high through Asia compared to ES, right? So, you kind of mark out this high, put it out here, you could see that there's a much more lower high being created. Another great way, I always use this as well, is take out your rectangle zone and mark out the range from high to low. So, if you mark out the high of overnight price, which is this Asia high, and then you mark out the low, what you could see through our low between NQ and then you also go to ES here. And you do the same thing. You mark out your Asia high and then you mark out your overnight low. You could see coming into the open, you see NQ trade at a lot deeper of a price than what N or what ES did through our range, right? So range high to low, you could see that ES was trading more so on the C of the mark coming into New York open. So right 9:30 a.m. right here, you see 50% point right at the halfway point. So kind of stuck in the middle of the range. But NQ was literally at the bottom of the range coming into the open. So that's a great way to identify, okay, how do I determine, you know, which asset is weaker? So from there, after determining that, what I simply did after recognition and that NQ was weaker was mark out our higher time frame PD arrays. We had two or a couple good PD arrays. We had an hourly gap fill here on NQ. We also had a 4-hour gap fill here as well. And then we also had an hourly and a 4-hour gap on ES as well. For me specifically, knowing how how weak we were on NQ coming into the open, what I wanted to see price do was trade into these arrays and I wanted to see price fill it. Um more so specifically because I wanted to see a clear opening range move. And NQ's opening range move, which if you guys don't know, I have a video on this on my YouTube channel. Um with the opening range move with NQ, we end up seeing the opening range move occur off almost a minute into the open, right? This one and low here as of getting taken out at 9:31 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. ES does not create its opening range move all the way up until right here, which is 9:33 a.m. So about a couple minutes later, we see ES eventually come down here and trade 9:34, excuse me. 3 minutes later, we see price on ES eventually come down and finally have its opening range move. So that's another great way, you know, to decide on which asset is weaker and which one is stronger, right? NQ having its opening range move lower before NQ or before ES. Um from there, what I wanted to see was a reaction. And this is important and this is why I was able to develop the bias that I had and be able to take the trade that I did. I wanted to see a reaction. We waited. We sat, waited, and we waited for a price to have a reaction through the low that we took. I marked out this 5-minute gap here on ES because this was a 5-minute displacive gap, the best gap you could work off off the New York open, which was also created during New York, and I wanted to see what price would do. Had we taken out this London low, seen a bit of a retrace, respect this 5-minute bearish gap, and then traded back down lower, especially with NQ being weaker, as we've discussed, you look to look for downside, right? Clearly, because you see the hourly time frame filled, and if we see a violation of this hourly gap, it's very clear that price most likely wants to draw lower into higher time frame gaps and levels. Well, what do we see price do here through the ES open? We see price sweep our London low, and then we see price trade back up here. What I want to make of like major What I want to talk about really more so significantly is the two components we look for in a reversal trade. London, why did you go long? Well, two main components in our system, as we always talk about, if it's a bullish long, obviously a bullish reversal long, we want to make sure that the low that we put in through that potential reversal back up higher is a significant low. And you could tell through our London low, through our hourly gap fill, and then through our 4-hour gap fill, you could see not only was this a overnight low that we took out, but it was a higher time frame area of interest we took out as well. So, you see multi-time frame alignment. The hourly, the 4-hour, the 5-minute time frame all align and put in a low at the same time at all different levels. And so, we end up seeing price then come back up, and then component number two for reversals is looking for displacement. And the reason you see me mark out this 5-minute gap through our live trading is because of the fact that I knew, okay, whatever we do based off this 5-minute gap would have given us a good indication of what price wanted to do, right? And we see price immediately come back up off the sweep of the low, and we see price displace through. We end up seeing NQ kind of do the same thing here and displace through back up after initially putting the low off the hourly gap. And so, that is when this came into play. Potential long into play 5-minute bullish inversion for value gap. London lows swept, hourly gap fill ES, right, and hourly gap fill on NQ. Liking the lows, now just need to see clear displacement. This is at 9:47 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. And you see me more so mark this out in the fact that, \"Okay, we've put in a really good low now, and now we're starting to see some build back up, right?\" Or price build back up. Now, what I want to see is price continue to do that. And if we see price come all the way up here, and we raid this 5-minute gap, we could look for a potential reversal and higher. Like we always talk about, Chad, when it comes to reversals, we are fixated on R, but we're also fixated on probability. And what drives a probability is when you have consistency in price. And so, for me to see price come up here and displace past this 5-minute gap, that's consistent enough in terms of bullish displacement for me to think, \"Okay, this is no longer just a retracement. This could potentially be in the reversal in the market trading up higher.\" With the displacement that we got and with the low that we put in. And we eventually end up coming here, and we end up taking this ideal long where we end up taking entry right here, confirming at 9:52 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. And what do you know? You see me mention that right there, I am long right at the 9:52 a.m. closure. I mention I am long. We also happen to take this trade live. Our break even point on this trade ended up being London highs, and our take profit one was the Asia high. And you eventually see, obviously, price come up. We go break even stops, and then we have our target one smashed. From there, all it simply was was trailing our stops. Here's obviously the execution on my um Trade the Five Lucid accounts. They met consistency today, and we ended up just simply trailing along the way, right? Trailing 7540, 7547, and then our TP2 ended up getting hit for about a 2.1R here. And just a beautiful move in the market. But here's the one thing I do want to go over. Plato, why the hell would you long ES today instead of NQ? NQ clearly looked better and coming up and inverting this gap before ES did, right? Because NQ was playing around off the end point at around 9:50 a.m. is when we closed and then ES had some closing 2 minutes later at 9:52. Let's go. NQ closed 2 minutes inverting NQ inverted this gap 2 minutes before ES. Why not take NQ? Well, here's the thing, recognition of price. Look just as we talked about higher time frame and also overnight price, what were we able to tell? Price on NQ was the weaker asset. At this point we were also more volatile, but NQ was the better asset to long overall even though NQ in this instance for today inverted before because NQ was much more displacive in this sell. So, if you end up actually longing today on NQ, you most likely would have closed out for a break even trade. But for us, longing on ES, we end up seeing a beautiful move back up where we capitalize on a tremendous long. And so we end up taking this trade as mentioned because A of that component and two, I just wanted to see more displacement on ES prior to taking a long. You eventually end up seeing we stuck with this. We take our entry and we see beautiful movement. Again, what I did today is I simply override or overrode taking NQ and taking ES because of the fact that price on ES was holding a lot better compared to NQ. We end up taking a long and again, our stop loss is based off the swing low. We could have used the model stop which would have been this area of interest here, right? The candle the fair value gap candle open or the fair value gap candle low. We end up seeing price come up here in a beautiful move back up into TP and again onwards. This is pretty textbook or as textbook it was as it could get. I guess the only thing that would like isn't A plus plus plus or the best trade ever is because of the fact that our higher time frame narrative was not A plus clear before the open, but it was after the open. We just had to wait a bit, but again, the reason this is so textbook is because we had higher time frame alignment alongside lower time frame alignment, and we see a beautiful sweep and a beautiful textbook model long. Like this is this is something I could frame and put into like our it to our like uh you know, trading strategy video where I use this as a perfect example of how our system works. That's how textbook it was today. So, a very good day overall where we caught a beautiful long and took the right asset to perform on and closing out for about $115,000 across all my accounts. Yesterday, I should have been down more than I was. I was only down $41,000, but that's because I was in and out during the live taking important calls, so I only executed on my personal account. I'm assuming I would if I took that, I probably would have been down around like 80-90. Um but now I'm a back up to over $100,000 on the week, and obviously the community is very green. We've had two different two different three days be green and capitalized very well. So, with that being said, that's the recap. See you guys in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/NkbZmrwUy3M" }, { "id": "Wq5QryU1eJU", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$100,000 Day Trading LIVE! (Going Over Yesterday Loss To)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wq5QryU1eJU", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 34, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 4.8, "shared_a_plus_score": 5.6, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 2062, "duration_seconds": 301, "chart_count": 10, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 30.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 60.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 90.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 120.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 150.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 180.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 210.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 240.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 270.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Wq5QryU1eJU/chart_10.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "Wq5QryU1eJU", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$100,000 Day Trading LIVE! (Going Over Yesterday Loss To)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wq5QryU1eJU", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 301, "view_count": 2062, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 5800, "transcript_path": "Wq5QryU1eJU/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 30.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 60.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 90.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 120.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 150.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 180.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 210.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 240.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 270.6 } ], "chart_count": 10, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "short", "long", "stop", "target", "take profit", "fair value gap", "bias" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "loss", "making", "session", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 4.8, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "drawdown", "stop loss" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 5.6, "keyword_hits": [ "fair value gap", "bias", "session", "london" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:55 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm up just shy of $100,000 day-trading, and in today's review, we'll be talking about the day overall and how we were able to combat yesterday's day um and take what we learned from yesterday's day into today. So, yesterday we had a session in which we took two trades, which were both losers. We did have a trade in the day, which ran really nicely, but ultimately came back down before take profit was smashed. Yesterday was an impatient day. We came into the morning having having a specific bias, and it was the tough or tough to trade. Um however, today we were a lot more patient and we simply got rewarded. Bias coming or bias coming into the open was relatively bullish. Initially off the get-go, what I wanted to see price do was come down here and see price take out overnight lows. We did not offer that off the entry. Let me show you guys that real quick. This was kind of the commentary piece right here. I said bullish S&P to start the day, but we we really like to prefer a sell off the open into the overnight lows. Coming down and running overnight lows takes out sell side, leaving upside to be a lot more profitable um or probable versus just opening at highs. Thinking short-term lower, long-term higher today. So, essentially what I was looking at here was I wanted to see price come down lower a bit, take out sell side objectives because if we were able to do that, we would avoid these overnight targets for potential of it coming back down to it, if that makes sense. So, sometimes what we'll do off opens is we'll have a bit of a bullish sequence, then we'll ultimately come down and follow through into the overnight sell sequence um and and taking out overnight lows. That's um kind of what we did a couple days ago, if I remember correctly. But, specifically for today, I wasn't too too upset with the open as opposed to yesterday because if you go back to yesterday's day, you could see that coming into the open, we had already seen such a bullish move overnight, and we were literally opening up opening up the trading session at all-time highs. It was a lot harder. Well, today not so much. Very close to all-time highs, but we had some data to work off with ES and NQ. Now, Leto, how the hell were you able to take your trade on ES, right? We took an ES long. Why not take NQ? Well, if you look at two components here, first things first, we had bullish SMT with ES and NQ. ES created a higher low, which then NQ created a lower low. So, what does that tell you? Well, it tells you that ES creating a higher low is a bit more bullish and holding the low as opposed to NQ creating a lower low. So, you see that right here. For me, a great indication is that you could see that price, right, creating a higher low on ES tells you that ES specifically wants to retain and sustain above in this range as opposed to trading lower as opposed to NQ at one point in time wanted to trade lower. I would have loved if this wick traded a bit lower and we had taken out, say, London low or even an Asia low, and then came back up. I felt this would have been A++. But, we did not. We simply played into our bullish bias, stood patient. The difference between today and yesterday is about an hour into the open, we were a couple trades deep. Today, we were not. We stood patient and simply waited for our trade. We then ended up looking at a potential idea, which was potential long in play structure off the open making it clear like we want higher, combining two 1-minute gaps, 1-minute bullish BPR plus 1-minute bullish fair value gap. Overnight highs target. This is the interest that we had in mind. It was an ES long. We eventually ended up taking the trade. I am long. Where we then saw price slowly but surely offer our take profit interest um in the high of London. Again, bias kind of coming into the open was identified being bullish because we had seen such a bullish overnight sequence. We had seen such a bullish trading day yesterday. Higher time frames, as we talked about in our review a couple days ago, looking at that daily time frame and how much we've been bullish and printing upside, it tells you, right? There's no reason, in my opinion, to assume we trade lower. Um Kind of looking at price here as well, you could see that um and so for us specifically, retain that upside interest. For me, it was either I get an upside trade today or I simply do not trade. We ended up taking this trade here and again, I think the reason this trade here ends up panning out, we're able to find success is A, we made a stop loss adjustment. We were We weren't very We weren't too tight on risk. We were properly utilizing a stop in this route of low. If you go back to yesterday's second trade chat, we end up taking a trade where we wicked out a wick low but not the swing low. We end up using a swing low here and we end up seeing prices actually initially come down into drawdown but then it will eventually come back up. The break even target off this trade was a 5-minute fill. We end up seeing price eventually do that and see a very successful move past that. Um In terms of the trade overall, I felt it was a good take in terms of our bias identified bullish through higher time frame overnight and open. In terms of price action, I thought it was pretty decent. We were structuring out. Again, the good thing that most traders overlook is the patience required to simply avoid this, right? We avoided this in order to capitalize on this. What we did yesterday is kind of traded into this and not avoid it. Today we did. So, good job on us, good part on us. And we see a good return on our investment today or in terms of our risk today. So, that's pretty much that. Hope you guys enjoy the recap. Catch you guys in the next one. Peace out, quick one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/Wq5QryU1eJU" }, { "id": "PZFVgAkYjl4", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$48,000 Day Trading Live (EXACTLY HOW I DID IT)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZFVgAkYjl4", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 35, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 3.2, "shared_a_plus_score": 5.6, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1434, "duration_seconds": 367, "chart_count": 9, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 81.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 122.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 163.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 203.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 244.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 285.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 326.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/PZFVgAkYjl4/chart_09.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "PZFVgAkYjl4", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$48,000 Day Trading Live (EXACTLY HOW I DID IT)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZFVgAkYjl4", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 367, "view_count": 1434, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 7520, "transcript_path": "PZFVgAkYjl4/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 81.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 122.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 163.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 203.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 244.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 285.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 326.3 } ], "chart_count": 9, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "orm", "long", "stop", "target", "take profit", "sweep", "bias", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "loss", "making", "session", "futures", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 3.2, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "stop loss" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 5.6, "keyword_hits": [ "bias", "session", "london", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:39 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm up over $48,000 day trading live. In this review, I'll be talking about the trade I took, why I took the trade where I did, and exactly how I got the outcome in which I did. We're officially back with the live reviews. Took a little bit of a break, a mental reset, where I wanted to take some time off, fix my neck issue, which is still kind of bothering me, but it's a lot better than what it was. And we're back here fully for the live reviews. So, in terms of price here, referencing price, if you're curious on the trade that we ended up taking today and we would make that money that we did, it was right here. It was an eight It was a Excuse me, an ES long that we took off a 1-minute gap go in for looking for a higher price. It's exactly what happened here. Well, before we talk about this trade exactly, what caused me to take this? Um you know, what what made me take the trade where I did here? Why not go long earlier? We had several ideas. Why did I wait till now? Well, if you take a look at the Discord, you could see that we had plenty of ideas before this trade, as we talked about just now, and we did not end up taking anything till now. Well, here's the first things first. Bias, determining our bias for the day. When it came to the trading session coming into today's session, it was a bit confusing. I will say through higher time frame. What caused me to stick to my bias, my bullish bias here looking for longs was primarily utilizing the opening range move. As of recent, New York hasn't been moving much. We've been seeing a ton of inside days, a ton of sessions through New York, where you see a trade inside overnight price, Asian London. It's been very hard to trade it. It's been very very hard to trade it because of the fact that New York is typically three to four times as volatile as an overnight session, right, Globex? Well, we're not seeing that happen, right? In the past couple days, specifically with yesterday, we didn't end up seeing price do anything until near the close. So, for me specifically, it was hard kind of coming into the open with not a very much so clear bias, but the one thing I did recognize with price here is that on the hourly time frame, we had installed a low, which we're still respecting. The one level I did work out was our previous day low, our PDL here, and then also some levels above. For me, off the open, what I ended up utilizing to my advantage as well was the new day opening gap. The new day opening gap alongside the opening range move, and you could see clearly here overnight price was a bit rangy there in Q and ES. We didn't really do a the whole bunch, but what you see very clear is you see price come down here to fulfill a target, and then you see price hold and ultimately look to trade higher. What I mean by that is you see ES and NQ here overnight come down here take out a low, where we then see price fulfill and then ultimately end up trading back up higher. Well, here is the difficult thing with price or with um opening range moves here. If you don't have an extreme higher time frame look, the opening range move is purely for the timing. So, for us today, it was a riskier day. It was a one-hour day, but it was a riskier day overall due to the fact that our higher time frame wasn't uh you completely clear. There was no multi-time frame alignment here. So, if we took a risk, it was a risk factor based upon the fact that we only used the opening range move. We see price off the open come down here. We see ES sweep overnight lows, uh London and Asia combined, but we we only end up seeing NQ sweep out London lows. Now, this is something I was eyeing here, and initially we were very choppy. We had a couple ideas which we were eyeing, but not did not end up uh decide to take because of the fact that price was super inside, right? So, for me specifically, I could just kept on waiting and waiting and waiting until something, you know, was clear. And eventually, we ended up seeing ES start to pick up the delivery, right? We weren't seeing this 5-minute time frame. We weren't seeing this 5-minute time frame like we were initially, where price was just up and down. We were starting to see new highs installed, and we were starting to see a push higher in price. So, for me specifically, although price is starting to become a bit clear, this is still a very risk-on trade. So, what I mean by that is, again, through the higher time frame not being extremely clear, and through utilizing the overnight price and just the opening range move, you're putting more risk onto yourself. Paired up with that, the entry model to this trade here wasn't still A++. So, I'm not here just kind of shit-talking the trade that we took, but more so telling you guys even on days where I have winning trades, it still might not be the best trades. Right, this trade right here was still a very risky take. I'd probably grade this trade a B plus, maybe A minus at best because of the fact that with our three components, we only had two. And with um price action, it wasn't the best in terms of entry. We ended up going long here a little bit after seeing price retest this one minute gap go invert. The initial invert happened at 10:33 a.m. Eastern Standard Time, but then we see price retest where we eventually take our trade. We have our stops based around our low, a pretty tight stop loss relative to what we usually have. But again, the reason you see me go tight stops here is because price is not moving much. So, when price is not moving much, your stop isn't have to be much either. Take profit interest was simply put line on highs and Asia highs. We end up marking that out clearly inside the Discord where we eventually end up taking the trade. You could see me post that right here, right? And then we end up saying I am long. Target one smashed eventually a bit a little bit after um off a beautiful idea where we took inside the community. Um and yeah, so the intent behind this trade was a simple continuation model trade higher where we wanted to see price go higher. That's all we wanted to do here, simply put. We saw price off the open come down here sweep overnight lows. We saw the new day opening gap filled and we saw the you know, us holding that low paired up with the fact that we saw this price to back up higher. And all we simply were doing here was being risky by taking a risk on trade where we had stop placed relative to low and our take profit placed overnight highs. Did I pay today? Yes. Can we take these type of trades in the futures and not hit stop? Sure. But the most important thing when it comes to taking trades like this is making sure you have conviction. And although today's trade was risky, it had conviction, right? So, I'd give this trade probably a B plus. Still a decent trade overall, but definitely not the best trade that we've had in a long time, right? So, this is kind of just a review of me talking about even though on good days we have good trades or even on uh good days we could have trades they don't might be the best. They might be might not be the craziest takes that we have, right? So, this is still a very risk on take, and um you know, risk put on, risk paid off. $48,000 across all my accounts copy traded via NinjaTrader, um the trading platform. So, did a real really good job there, and um with that being said, that's the review. Hopefully you guys enjoyed it, and back at it tomorrow. Hopefully I'm back to Puerto Rico soon. Peace out.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/PZFVgAkYjl4" }, { "id": "D4nFnRUzqWU", "content_type": "video", "title": "Losing -$31,000 Day Trading Live Infront of 1800+ People!", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4nFnRUzqWU", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 36, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 3.2, "shared_a_plus_score": 4.2, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1974, "duration_seconds": 440, "chart_count": 11, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 80.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 120.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 160.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 200.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 240.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 280.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 320.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 360.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 400.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/D4nFnRUzqWU/chart_11.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "D4nFnRUzqWU", "content_type": "video", "title": "Losing -$31,000 Day Trading Live Infront of 1800+ People!", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4nFnRUzqWU", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 440, "view_count": 1974, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 8463, "transcript_path": "D4nFnRUzqWU/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 40.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 80.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 120.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 160.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 200.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 240.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 280.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 320.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 360.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 400.3 } ], "chart_count": 11, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "orm", "short", "long", "confirmation", "stop", "take profit", "bias" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "loss", "losing", "session", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 3.2, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "drawdown" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 4.2, "keyword_hits": [ "bias", "confirmation", "session" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:36 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm down just shy of $31,000 on the trading day. And after coming off a great day yesterday, I'm now officially back in red on the week. Here are the trades that caused me to go red. So, if you're watching the review yesterday, you guys saw we capitalized on one good trade through the morning. We capitalized for about a 1.3 R. Well, today, I'm down a minus 2 R. And so, I'm down a 0.7 R on the week, and I'm down just shy, I believe, of 6 and 7,000 dollars on the week. Pretty frustrating, because today I wasn't live with Ninja Trader and the show, and I ended up taking two trades where I stopped out on both through prop firms and through my personal account. So, [clears throat] question is, Net tell, what causes Why do you take these stop outs? Why do you take these trades in the first place? But before we get into that, let's talk about my bias. Let's talk about what I was looking for, what I was thinking about as we came into the session. So, referencing higher time frame. Well, if you look at the higher time frame scheme of things here, what do we end up doing coming into the open? First things first, identification. What you can tell through the higher time frame, through the hours hourly specifically, is that we haven't been doing too much. Price has been trading at a state where it's been up and down consistently, and you see more of that today. But, what do we do coming into the open? Although we end up seeing a beautiful sell through the opening range move or, excuse me, through the overnight sequence, we end up seeing price come down here, and we end up seeing price install lows off a 4-hour and hourly gap fill. So, if you guys were on Ninja Trader live, you guys saw from me off the open, my potential interest was entertaining upside. Here's the thing. We did end up seeing upside off the open, which was crazy. We ended up seeing a pretty good sequence. However, I missed any opportunity because I was waiting for the opening range move. We're currently it's 2:12 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, and NQ still has not had its opening range movement to an overnight over overnight higher overnight low. What I was looking for off the open with ES being the weaker asset off the open was I was looking for ES to come down here preferably and see a price sequence where price comes down, fulfills this on a low take and then end up seeing a reversal back up. We ended up coming down here and we ended up seeing price create equal lows, but ultimately um ended up coming right back down after the initial buy up higher. Now, for me specifically, two things happened today. The first trade I ended up taking happened before this had that ended up occurring. So, I got a bit impatient today. That's the first thing I recognized hindsight is I was a bit impatient. I didn't wait for what I wanted to see. I think um we had I forgot her name. I think Salima. I forgot what her name was. But, the other two people I was trading with today online, they had great patience, especially the the girl trader. She did not end up taking a trade until she wanted exactly or she she she did until she got exactly what she wanted. Um and I had exactly what I wanted to here as well, which is the take of the low and then the move back up. I ended up taking a trade before that happened. So, I kind of went away from that and I was a bit impatient. If you're curious on the trade, my thought process behind this look off the first take was a continuation sentiment. Both takes were continuation sentiment, but specifically with this trade here, what I was looking for price to do was I was looking for price to come up here and I was looking for price to uh violate the 1-minute gap array. We ended up taking a long stab off this 1-minute gap right here, which rebalanced, right? But, pair that up with the 1-minute gap going for it, that was what I was looking for. Here's another thing I did wrong. And again, I'm not blaming any trader. I don't know what it is, but I was just off today overall. I did not end up waiting for the confirmation sequence. We ended up seeing a 1-minute gap here, which tapped it, but we ended up rejecting and closing back down under. I ended up taking this trade before confirmation every even hit. Um so, that was frustrating as well. So, I was just sloppy on my end today. Yesterday, we were very locked in. Last time we were on the we were very locked in. Today, you could see already two things that happened within this review that should not be happening for a trader like myself. We end up seeing price wick back down and ultimately, obviously, with no confirmation sequence inverting this gap and closing above this one-minute gap, we end up seeing price come right back down. And immediately, within the course of a couple minutes, we almost immediately get stopped out. Pretty, um, unfortunate. >> [snorts] >> From there, my consensus still stood the same, which is my belief in the overnight highs. And what I wanted to see price do more so on ES, recognizing ES being the weaker asset, was I wanted to see price come down and again, take out this one-minute low. Once taking out that one-minute low, we then see price react off that. We do We do eventually end up seeing price come down here. We see price end up touching the lows. We do install equal lows, but now my thought process now is, \"Okay, we came down, made the move, and now we're starting to see a move back up.\" All ES would require was a temporary push up through the divergence that we had here. Being that ES was so weak, all we would need to see ES do, in theory, in my head, my belief was we would need to see a short-term move back up. Even if it was short-term, that would be enough for our take profits to be gauged on NQ. So, we ended up coming into the second trade here, and the thought process behind this trade, similar to the first trade, was a one-minute gap rebalance. We wanted to see price essentially come Oops, excuse me. We wanted to see price come down here, rebalance off this gap after initially putting in the low off where it did, with ES being, um, and or be at be learning lows. And what I wanted to see price do was immediately flip back up. Now, with this trade, we did end end up getting proper confirmation. We did end up seeing price properly come back up and bounce up higher. But the issue is, we ended up installing equal lows. That was the problem here. That was the risk factor behind this trade. I will say this second entry here was definitely a bit better of a take for me as opposed to the first one. The second trade had better components, and there wasn't any mess-ups with confirmation like we had on the first trade. We were very locked in on the second entry. It just did not end up panning out because ES had objective in lower. And ES being the weaker asset eventually dragged down NQ with it taking our stop out on this trade eventually after I believe having some volatility here kick in. So, pretty frustrating because had I been completely locked in in my belief today is a day where I probably at worst have a loss, one loss, on a minus one R. Or I am break even on the day. I don't believe today at any point I would have capitalized off a very green trade because my bias was wrong and I would have probably stuck long bias for a wise or long bias for a while here. Um but I do believe had we stuck or had we been more patient and had we stuck to conviction more properly with patience, we would have possibly not have a drawdown which we did. There are some days chat like today for example where I look in hindsight and even through the hindsight reflection with my bias there's probably almost no take here that I have today that makes me you know, green or a good amount of green here, right? Because for the most part after the initial open here, we ended up seeing price just trade back down. So, I think today at best is a break even day and there's nothing wrong with that. There's going to be some days where you come in and price is not the best. But ultimately you just did not, you know, have the patience that was required for today and ate up two losses now putting me back down a little bit on the week. So, we'll see how the rest of the week closes out and we'll see how we perform, but could this be the first red week in a little while? Who knows? Let's see. Let's find out. With that being said, that's the review. I'm going to catch you guys in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/D4nFnRUzqWU" }, { "id": "Zht08hZAtW8", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$100,000 Day Trading In An Hour! (Live Infront of 1600+ People)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zht08hZAtW8", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 37, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 8.7, "risk_mgmt_score": 1.6, "shared_a_plus_score": 8.4, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 2606, "duration_seconds": 330, "chart_count": 11, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 30.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 60.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 90.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 120.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 150.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 180.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 210.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 240.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 270.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 300.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/Zht08hZAtW8/chart_11.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "Zht08hZAtW8", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$100,000 Day Trading In An Hour! (Live Infront of 1600+ People)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zht08hZAtW8", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 330, "view_count": 2606, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 6624, "transcript_path": "Zht08hZAtW8/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 30.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 60.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 90.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 120.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 150.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 180.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 210.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 240.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 270.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 300.3 } ], "chart_count": 11, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "short", "confirmation", "stop", "target", "take profit", "fair value gap", "liquidity", "bias" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 8.7, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "making", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 1.6, "keyword_hits": [ "risk" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 8.4, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "fair value gap", "bias", "confirmation", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:44 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today, I'm up just shy of a hundred thousand dollars day trading live in front of fifteen hundred people. Today, I was on the Trader Five Show. They hosted me and we had a good time catching a beautiful short. And this was the short that I ended up taking. It was a five-minute gap rebalance where I wanted to see price trade off confirm and had lower into ultimate drop. But before we talk about the trade, let's talk about our bias. Let's talk about how we thought about what we did, why we took, you know, the risk where we did, and what caused this trade to be taken here. So, first things first, higher time frame look. Well, for me, it was the hourly time frame all the way starting from yesterday. If you're in the Discord and you looked at my first post through Asia last night, I said looking at this week um so far, higher time frame seems range. Highs put into the Sunday night filling out the hourly gap. New York rated and came back down PM. Now, Asia is selling down furthermore. Draw target we should see tonight is 29683. The reaction at the low take will give us clarity in what the rest of the overnight price will do plus New York. That is what I'm eyeing. Can potentially play shorts into that tonight. So, on the hourly time frame, what I was referencing was this hourly low which we had put in our previous day low PDL. And what I wanted to see price do was come down here take the low because had we taken the low, we have now taken out clear area of south side and the reaction based on the low will give us a good idea behind what price truly wants to do. And so, what you end up seeing price do here on the hourly time frame is you see price come down here and around 11:00 and take out the low. And what do you see price do? You do not see price once showcase any clear reversal interest off the low showcasing a potential move down lower. Now, me leaning downside naturally here due to the fact that price on higher time frame was pointing bearish because of the fact that we had that sell and because of the fact that we had seen that sell get taken out, what I now wanted to see price do or wanted to see price do is off the New York open with their opening range move as we've discussed all the time on our reviews, opening range move is the first move into area of liquidity. What I wanted to see price do to the ran queue was see a reaction either confirming or denying upside interest. So, it's one thing having your higher time frame look on the hourly time frame which we did. It's the next thing confirming if it wants to see that move now. So, we see price off the open, right? Essentially, um, trade down here off the open into this Asian low and then we see a beautiful reaction into this Asian low where we then see price confirm the potential interest in drawing lower. And what's the clear area of interest where price could draw into past this hourly low which we had initially taken out, 29328. And if you're on the live stream today on the Traderfi live in front of all those people, I was calling for this draw level here from the top of the stream, right? So, before we even took our trade which was late way later on, I was looking at the potential of our draw target in 29328 being taken. And that's because of the fact that the hourly time frame was looking bearish with the low being put in place and with price potentially wanting to seek lower. And on top of that, the opening range move through New York trading bearish. So, you have multi time frame alignment here. You have your hourly put in, right? With the low and then you have your opening range move occurring where you see price really trade well seeking a bearish move into the Asian low and then you see price trade past forward. Um, so from there, all it was was simply waiting for potential optimal entry. I think once the area of interest where price kind of confirmed interest in driving lower past Asian lows and potentially into 29328 was around here. Once we saw price retrace here initially after taking out Asian lows and then seeing a beautiful rejection back down. We had initially missed this entry because price wasn't confirming yet, but once we confirmed that price wanted to see lower, I then simply waited for the potential in a retracement before looking into that 29328 level. That's exactly what we see happen here. On the 5-minute time frame, you see a beautiful 5-minute gap rebalance, 5-minute bearish gap where price comes back up, we tap into and then you see price kind of flip back down. In terms of the stop placement on this trade, it was the 5-minute candle, the fair value gap wick high. Wanted to give this trade a bit more breathing room in the case we did wick a bit above a bit or a bit over, excuse me. And so we see price kind of take the gap, touch it. We see price come down, and we see price ultimately drive down into that take profit interest. My entry for this trade here precisely was the closer closure at 10:03 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. That was when confirmation hit because we see price tap the gap, we see price retract it nicely. Ideally, most times what you will see is you'll see a 5-minute gap rebalance here and you'll see like a 1-minute gap go invert right here. But for me specifically, we didn't Well, for today specifically, excuse me, we didn't necessarily have that. So, we see price come down. We still see a strong closure under, and we take the trade where our stop was placed there, and our take profit interest was in 29328. We see take profit get smashed and ultimately hit consistency on all my firms. And held on my live account where we we eventually got trailed out for just about 1R, uh but a 1.2R off of take profit one interest smashed. And again, that all came starting from our post last night in the Discord about our hourly reference. You see price come down here, and you eventually even end up seeing me update it saying the reaction in the slow will dictate narrative for tomorrow. And you see that happen, right? The reaction in the low was pretty bearish. What does New York off the open do? Trade bearish bearish opening range move confirming on multiple time frames on higher time frame and lower time frame that price would like to most likely seek lower. Then from there it was marking your draw, 29328, and simply optimizing a good entry point, which is what we did. A beautiful day simply day put or simple day put. But an hour of work done today for just have $100,000 made on the day. And so yeah, beautiful day overall. That's the recap. Hopefully you guys enjoyed. We'll catch you guys in the next one. Peace out.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/Zht08hZAtW8" }, { "id": "gd1Hql7XJIM", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making 160,000+ After Taking a LOSS (TEXTBOOK TRADE)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gd1Hql7XJIM", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 38, "entry_model_score": 10.0, "live_execution_score": 7.5, "risk_mgmt_score": 6.4, "shared_a_plus_score": 8.4, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1780, "duration_seconds": 599, "chart_count": 14, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 42.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 85.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 128.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 171.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 213.9, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 256.7, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 299.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 342.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_09.png" }, { "file": "chart_10.png", "t_sec": 385.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_10.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_10.png" }, { "file": "chart_11.png", "t_sec": 427.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_11.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_11.png" }, { "file": "chart_12.png", "t_sec": 470.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_12.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_12.png" }, { "file": "chart_13.png", "t_sec": 513.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_13.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_13.png" }, { "file": "chart_14.png", "t_sec": 556.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_14.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/gd1Hql7XJIM/chart_14.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "gd1Hql7XJIM", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making 160,000+ After Taking a LOSS (TEXTBOOK TRADE)", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gd1Hql7XJIM", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 599, "view_count": 1780, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 11551, "transcript_path": "gd1Hql7XJIM/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 42.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 85.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 128.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 171.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 213.9 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 256.7 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 299.5 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 342.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_10.png", "t_sec": 385.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_11.png", "t_sec": 427.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_12.png", "t_sec": 470.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_13.png", "t_sec": 513.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_14.png", "t_sec": 556.2 } ], "chart_count": 14, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "entry model", "orm", "textbook", "long", "stop", "target", "take profit", "fair value gap", "liquidity", "sweep", "bias", "setup", "model" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 7.5, "keyword_hits": [ "profit", "loss", "making", "nq", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 6.4, "keyword_hits": [ "risk", "stop loss", "psychology", "revenge" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 8.4, "keyword_hits": [ "liquidity", "liq", "fair value gap", "bias", "london", "new york" ] }, "preferred_pack": "ENTRY_MODEL", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:44 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Today I'm up over $160,000 on the trading day. And guess what? I took a loss before my day today. And this was the trade that was the winner. Trade in New York had a loser and a winner. But before we get into the trade and talk about what it was, let's zoom out. Why did I think the way I did? Why did I take the trade where I did? Let's get into it. So, starting off through a bias, the higher time frame outlook. Well, the past couple of days I've been bullish, bullish and relative, and we haven't seen price do much up until today. Today, we finally saw that expansion we were looking for in price, and we finally saw that movement towards upside. Well, why did I have a bullish bias? Well, seemingly, if you reference the hourly alongside the 4hour, what you could see is that ES came down here after a large tremendous sell, taking out a great area of external sellside being 7479. Likewise with NQ, right? NQ ended up taking out that area of interest just as much as ES did. Ended up trading a bit lower actually as well. Well, after sweeping the low, we essentially saw price showcase a move back up. What are the two components that we always talk about when it comes to identifying reversals through any time frame significant low being put in place and large displacement back up for a bullish reversal? That's exactly what we got here. So, my bias coming into the open was partly playing into that. Alongside that through a lower time frame, what we were able to get a gauge of was get a gauge of overnight price and get a gauge of the opening range move. If you look at overnight price, you could see that price for the most part was at a bullish state by trading higher and higher through Asia through London. Did we trade the most significant in terms of displace? No. But we were continuing onwards pushing higher off the low that we had put in place through ES solidifying the low that we put in is a low that we want to keep. We then see price build up here and off the opening range move. You see a beautiful move up higher. That is when my first interest sparked up. My first interest in going long. Now coming into the open, you guys know we trade ESNQ. The best way we are able to identify which asset to take is through looking at price action and through looking at the highs and the lows of current price and where it's trading at. Let me talk about that. So basically looking at ENQ on the one minute time frame and looking at ES on the one minute time frame here, what you're able to recognize coming into the open is that you see ES is a lot more stagnant as opposed to NQ was. What I mean by that is off the New York open you see you see price on NQ come up. You see price take out let highs and you see your opening range move and then you see a significant push past that. Well, if you look at ES, ES essentially comes up off the open and we do end up eventually taking out that London high, but the highs that we put in place through ES or at least coming up into it were a lot lower compared to NQ, right? If you look at our London highs, you could see right here specifically at I believe, yeah, this candle right here, 9:35 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. So, 5 minutes after our open, we get our opening range move into London highs. Yes. However, does not end up taking out that high until 9:42 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. So, you see one asset take out a high 7 minutes earlier than the previous asset did. That is a great way we we um identify divergence. And from there, we recognized, okay, based off that and based off price off the open, what we're able to tell is if we entertain upside interest, it would be ES. So, after identifying higher time frame, look, overnight price and the opening range move, we could see all three components were actually bullish. And so for me, I entertain the idea behind being risk on here. As we always talk about, you always have to have a plan. Have your system, have your management in place, and don't always just try to look for a trade. Wait for your components and your system to line up. When they do, you know when to be riskone. When it's not, you don't be risk. So, our first trade of the day came on NQ after recognizing divergence. And what we ended up looking at was a potential retracement into these two one minute gap imbalances. Atlanta. Why not have a, you know, a normal one minute gap? Well, I combined two minute or two one minute gaps here because these two one minute gaps here weren't the most displac. As you guys know, the best component when it comes to blocking out the noise in terms of identifying fair value gaps is looking for gaps that are the most displac. These gaps were not that they were displally for. So, we essentially combine these two gaps where we want to see price potentially retrace into and then offer an entry model. And that's exactly what we did. We see price retrace at this sequence right here and we eventually see price confirm interest by bouncing off the gap. You see me mention that on my discord where I say the potential outlook of taking this NQ trade. We then go risk on and put our trade in position right here. I am long where we take our trade but unfortunately as you guys see we stop out. Now here's the thing. This right here is a loss I am willing to take a million out of 10 times. a million at a million times because this is a good systematical loss. Here's the thing that helps me a lot with my psychology is when I take trades and I know I take high conviction trades, I don't care if I lose or win because I have a concept. I have a system revolved around my trading where I've had proof of concept for so long. You guys obviously have seen it. When you follow a system that you know is profitable, even though you might not see profits today or be profitable for a small stretch, you know, as long as you continue to follow that system, you will be profitable down the line. So, we took a loss today and this was a beautiful textbook long. Again, higher time frame outlook was clear and bullish. Overnight price was bullish. Opening range move was bullish. NQ was a leading asset. We had every component that we wanted out of this trade. You know, the or the entry model gave in. We ended up taking the trade right here. You could have theoretically taken your entry here or here, one of these two candles. The stop placement was this one minute wick low and we simply looked for draw targets higher in this 4hour wick high. We see price go in the money or initially but after seeing that 4hour gap though fill we actually end up seeing price come right back down stopping us out on this trade. Now after this I will say I was a bit cautious in price recognizing that price has been a lot more internal as of recently. I wanted to wait and see until price would clear up for me to take a potential long again because the only thing I was eyeing was longs due to the fact of my bullish bias. Had we traded lower, I simply would have stayed cash. Had we traded lower, the charts would have been confusing to me. And I think you guys didn't know, no matter what level of a trader you are, myself or even people who are better than me, you will have points where you won't understand what the chart does. And that's the beauty of having a system, you don't need to. You only need to know when the charts make sense when your system appears. So, we then proceed and eventually after sweeping coming down here and sweeping our New York lows on ES, what I was looking for was looking for the same concept as we referenced on the hourly time frame. Go back at the start of this review. You could see that on the hourly time frame, what did we say? Once a low is taken, you want to see a good low being put in place and you want to see clear displacement off the low. Well, that's the exact thing I was looking at here on ES off the New York low of day. Did I expect a lower? Yeah. But did we see a price? Did we see price come down and sweep the low? Yes. And most importantly, we saw clear displace back up. So once we had seen that, just like with our higher time frame bias, we simply look to be risk on here on the one minute time frame. And this time, instead of combining two one minute gaps, we end up taking one one minute gap because this gap is clearly displacive than this gap where this gap, these two gaps were right here, right? A lot bigger displacement, a lot bigger of a body. And we end up seeing price come up here. And the ideology again was playing into that higher time frame bias after seeing a sweep of low and clear displacement back up. We happen to take our entry and our fill was around here. Your model entry ideally is right here. But I took a beautiful fill right after the closure. Our stop loss on this idea was this one minute wick low. You could have used our model stop which would would have been the fair value gap candle low or open. That could have worked as well. We eventually end up seeing price come into play. We take entry at the closure right here because this candle right here ends up inverting the one minute gap at 20 10:20 or 10:27 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. Met with initial initial consolidation and then we see price trade up. Target one was right here. I'm long. We went risk- free here. Target one was high of day. We went risk-f free internally because after initially taking this long with such a beautiful setup in my eyes even though it lost I was a bit cautious on price and I made sure I kept my stops risk or kept my break even stops pretty tight and wanted to go risk-f free pretty soon because of the fact that price hasn't been trading the best. We come up here, take out highs, trade past, we eventually end up meeting TP1, where then we end up then then going to take profit two, which is this hourly gap fill, take profit three, this hourly internal high, and now just still trading onwards. I'm still holding this trade as I'm recording this. So, a beautiful trade. And again, the reason you see us take a beautiful trade and the reason you see us be green today is because we did not revenge trade. We didn't feed into emotions. We simply stuck to our plan. higher time frame booked overnight booked um opening range move booked as well all bullish and although we took a loss initially we didn't cry about it we stuck to our system and recognized it was a systematical loss and simply moved on that's the importance here a beautiful trade where we took a nice setup what I will say is what would have made this A++ is had we came down here maybe created some bullish on some T seen London lows get taken out what would I have not done here had we seen price come back up here chat is a either not put in a significant low like the sweep of the low off New York low of day or B seen price come up here and trade slowly and displace into this gap. Had we seen price kind of trade in this state coming into this gap, you would have not seen me take this trade. But being that price put on a good low, took a good area of liquidity and we saw price clearly showcase interest in driving back up. We simply put risk on identifying that clearly and all of our higher time frame, lower time frame components lined up and we caught a beautiful trade, a textbook trade where we're now green of the day and I'm up over $160,000, maybe a bit little bit less now because the trade's still floating. So with that being said, that's the review. Hopefully you guys enjoyed this one and I'm going catch you guys on the next one. Beautiful bounce back.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/gd1Hql7XJIM" }, { "id": "FODffDi9s2g", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$400,000 Day Trading Live!", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FODffDi9s2g", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 39, "entry_model_score": 7.5, "live_execution_score": 10.0, "risk_mgmt_score": 3.2, "shared_a_plus_score": 7.0, "preferred_pack": "LIVE_EXECUTION", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 2466, "duration_seconds": 286, "chart_count": 9, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 31.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 63.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 95.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 127.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 159.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 190.8, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 222.6, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_08.png" }, { "file": "chart_09.png", "t_sec": 254.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_09.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/FODffDi9s2g/chart_09.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "FODffDi9s2g", "content_type": "video", "title": "Making +$400,000 Day Trading Live!", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FODffDi9s2g", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 286, "view_count": 2466, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 5329, "transcript_path": "FODffDi9s2g/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 31.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 63.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 95.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 127.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 159.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 190.8 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 222.6 }, { "file": "charts/chart_09.png", "t_sec": 254.4 } ], "chart_count": 9, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 7.5, "keyword_hits": [ "entry", "long", "stop", "take profit", "bias" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 10.0, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "day trading", "profit", "loss", "making", "nq", "es", "execution" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 3.2, "keyword_hits": [ "stop loss", "invalidation" ] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 7.0, "keyword_hits": [ "bias", "london", "new york", "invalidation", "invalidate" ] }, "preferred_pack": "LIVE_EXECUTION", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:58 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "All right, this is the elaborate reach for the 22nd of April. A wonderful day, fantabulous day. Back to the reviews. Just was on vacation. Now we're back at it, so a killer day in the Discord with the community where we capitalized on a beautiful 3.5 R trade. Here's a quick review on the look. Right. TP smash 3.5 R and here was kind of the idea, me mentioning I'm long. Beautiful day. So, what entailed me to take the trade I took today? Well, there's a couple components. There's your bias, there's your trade, and obviously there's the um execution aspect with price. And uh yeah, so a pretty eventful day like I said. Kind of coming into the open through my bias as you guys know, I use this thing called the opening range move where it's the first move off of New York open into the typically an overnight high or low. And based off that, we kind of get a gauge of bias. We did not happen to use that today because I more so got a gauge of price overall. For me, I was a bit more neutral at the time of entering New York open due to how price was overnight, which was very choppy. You look at conditions right here, we were just very up and down, not really doing much in price as compared to, you know, previously. Um but for me, I was leaning slightly upside due to higher time frames and just sentiment overall because of the fact that we are trading all-time highs and we've seen such a tremendous move in the past week and you know, a little bit. So, um a day today where we capitalized really nicely. Um once we had seen our initial move off the open, I stood very patient. And here's the thing that I really want to emphasize that a lot of people don't get a gauge of or don't really they they more so overlook before entering this trade. Although we're one for one today and we caught a 3.5 R trade, you have to remember the patience that was required in order to get here. A lot of traders when they first start, you know, are newer traders, inexperienced traders, or traders who just don't know how to, you know, manage emotions well, they'll just look at to take a trade just to take a trade. What we did here off the open was we simply avoided price. We simply waited for price to look to get better. Once that happened, we simply took entry. Well, if you look at price here off the open, you could see that price clearly wasn't the best off the open and we were more so seeing price just chop chop chop. And so for me, when I was looking at it, I was not trying to trade this, right? Because of the fact that it was not up to our standard. And I think this is something that you guys have to more so make sure you constantly look at when it comes whenever it comes to you journaling or simply reflecting and realizing that this this right here, us not taking the trade, it's just equally if not more important than actually the trade. Right? Not only, you know, is it important to make money in the market, but it's also important to save money. Because people can make money, can they actually save it? And so for us, we kind of waited here for a bit and a bit and a bit. We eventually see price showcase some interest in potentially moving higher. We see an internal sell side grab which kind of sparked up my interest. Me being slightly bullish here made me want to believe that we could see a potential move up higher. So, that's what I more so looked at to do here. We had a one-minute gap go invert where we ended up seeing price come up here and eventually go invert. The idea off this trade here was obviously the inverse closure or inverse closure. And then um a one-minute wick low as my stop loss. You could have easily kept your stop the swing low here if you felt you needed to give price a bit more wiggle room, but I was content with where our stop was. I felt it was a good invalidation point. I felt as if if price were to come up here invert and then come back down into this low, that not only would we invalidate this low, but we would see price come down here take out this low here as well. So, that kind of just mitigates the potential of excess loss. And we see price eventually come up here and our break even for this trade here was all-time high, which was 11 highs on NQ. And simply for our take profit in mind, our take profit on my in mind for this trade was 27,000. It was a psych level. It's very hard to base levels on NQ through all-time highs because when you're in a situation like we were today where you have no historical data, it's very um hard. Chat, let me share my screen here. Oops. There you go. Uh but when you have a gauge of price um and when you see price more so look to shoot here, once I felt like London highs were taken, I had strong conviction in the high or higher being pushed in. And we see price eventually come up here. We see price initially stall off the high, but then we see price over time just come up here and we take it. You see how that 27,000 level could be a, you know, very tough psych level. And we more so got a gauge behind both. We saw that ES was slightly weaker, aka also lagging, so we took NQ, the leading asset. But a beautiful trade overall, simple review, a simple day where where we saw a pretty pretty decent ROI. So, if [snorts] you guys have any questions in chat, you guys can let me know. And yeah, great freaking review.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/FODffDi9s2g" }, { "id": "ZV6vXSbyb30", "content_type": "video", "title": "What a Max Prop Firm Payout Actually Looks Like", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZV6vXSbyb30", "channel": "@lantotrades", "rank": 40, "entry_model_score": 3.0, "live_execution_score": 5.7, "risk_mgmt_score": 0.0, "shared_a_plus_score": 0.0, "preferred_pack": "LIVE_EXECUTION", "transcript_source": "caption", "view_count": 1862, "duration_seconds": 192, "chart_count": 8, "charts": [ { "file": "chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZV6vXSbyb30/chart_01.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZV6vXSbyb30/chart_01.png" }, { "file": "chart_02.png", "t_sec": 24.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZV6vXSbyb30/chart_02.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZV6vXSbyb30/chart_02.png" }, { "file": "chart_03.png", "t_sec": 48.1, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZV6vXSbyb30/chart_03.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZV6vXSbyb30/chart_03.png" }, { "file": "chart_04.png", "t_sec": 72.2, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZV6vXSbyb30/chart_04.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZV6vXSbyb30/chart_04.png" }, { "file": "chart_05.png", "t_sec": 96.3, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZV6vXSbyb30/chart_05.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZV6vXSbyb30/chart_05.png" }, { "file": "chart_06.png", "t_sec": 120.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZV6vXSbyb30/chart_06.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZV6vXSbyb30/chart_06.png" }, { "file": "chart_07.png", "t_sec": 144.4, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZV6vXSbyb30/chart_07.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZV6vXSbyb30/chart_07.png" }, { "file": "chart_08.png", "t_sec": 168.5, "url": "/shots/lanto_youtube/ZV6vXSbyb30/chart_08.png", "rel": "shots/lanto_youtube/ZV6vXSbyb30/chart_08.png" } ], "setup_card": { "schema_version": "lanto_youtube_setup_card_v1", "id": "ZV6vXSbyb30", "content_type": "video", "title": "What a Max Prop Firm Payout Actually Looks Like", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZV6vXSbyb30", "channel": "@lantotrades", "duration_seconds": 192, "view_count": 1862, "transcript_source": "caption", "transcript_chars": 3267, "transcript_path": "ZV6vXSbyb30/transcript.txt", "pack_lane": "lanto_trades", "om_note": "Training card only — not Holdout dossier; not Roman/ZZ OM; not Nitro Holdout gallery", "charts": [ { "file": "charts/chart_01.png", "t_sec": 0.0 }, { "file": "charts/chart_02.png", "t_sec": 24.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_03.png", "t_sec": 48.1 }, { "file": "charts/chart_04.png", "t_sec": 72.2 }, { "file": "charts/chart_05.png", "t_sec": 96.3 }, { "file": "charts/chart_06.png", "t_sec": 120.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_07.png", "t_sec": 144.4 }, { "file": "charts/chart_08.png", "t_sec": 168.5 } ], "chart_count": 8, "chart_error": null, "ranking": { "entry_model": { "setup_id": "LANTO_ENTRY_MODEL", "score": 3.0, "keyword_hits": [ "orm" ] }, "live_execution": { "setup_id": "LANTO_LIVE_EXECUTION", "score": 5.7, "keyword_hits": [ "live", "futures", "es" ] }, "risk_mgmt": { "setup_id": "LANTO_RISK_MGMT", "score": 0.0, "keyword_hits": [] }, "shared_a_plus": { "setup_id": "SHARED_A_PLUS", "score": 0.0, "keyword_hits": [] }, "preferred_pack": "LIVE_EXECUTION", "notes": "Keyword heuristic ENTRY_MODEL / LIVE_EXECUTION / RISK_MGMT + shared A+ keywords (liquidity/FVG/bias/confirmation/session/invalidation); not a live hit-rate. Farm ranks primarily by ENTRY_MODEL then LIVE_EXECUTION." }, "generated_at": "2026-09-25 10:53 AEST", "purpose": "transcript_training_card", "not_holdout_dossier": true }, "transcript": "Looking to get funded? SmartPropFirm is your all-in-one platform for [music] exclusive deals on top futures prop firms. Get the best discounts available and earn smart [music] points to redeem free evaluations. Plus, get a free eval every month with our payout bonus when you trade with top prop partners like Lucid and TradiFi. Visit smartpropfirm.com through the link in the description [music] to maximize your trading benefits. Come with me as I go and request max payouts for my Lucid and TradiFi accounts. If you guys don't know, I trade straight to funded accounts on my Lucid and TradiFi accounts. I've been copying them together for about a couple weeks now, and I'm at max payout. Pretty exciting. If you haven't experienced a payout yet or a max payout, I'm going to show you guys exactly what it looks like. So, first things first, TradiFi or Lucid? I'm going to go with TradiFi. So, we're on TradiFi here. Just going to refresh to confirm. You could see that I have five accounts awaiting for payout. Right? All straight to funded 150K lightning funded accounts. What straight to funded means, essentially, what lightning funded means is that you pass the evaluation stage. You essentially pay more money to have a straight to funded account. So, payout number one. Let's go ahead here and request payout. You can withdraw up to $15,000. Well, this is pretty neat. I didn't know this is a new addition. So, I'm going to click on accounts. Then, I'm going to request $3,000 on each account. And there you go. There you have it. You're about a $15,000 request on five accounts. Um pretty cool. So, you could see, here we go. Requesting payout. You could see what I get. It's about $13,500. After about a couple seconds, boom, you get your um noty that you have requested the $13,500. As you can see, my lifetime payouts are about $115,000. With this payout here, it will probably be about $130,000 on the firm. Pretty stoked. Now, let's go into Lucid. Refresh Lucid, you could see that I have four accounts awaiting payout. Let me uh show you the dashboard real quick. So, as you can see, this is my calendar on Lucid Trading. You can see that I approach prop firms slightly different to I approach my live account. If you know me, I love trading R on my live account. On prop firms, I'm more so a compound-esque type of trader. More of the future to come on that. But, you can see this is legit. If I go to payouts, I simply click on request payout. Boom, just like Trade the Five, you have a $3,000 request. And there you go. Four accounts on here, one account is just above consistency. So, I got that account on Monday. But, essentially five accounts here, plus the five accounts I requested on Trade the Five, totally me to a $30,000 payout. It took me years to get to this point. It was hard work, for sure. Took a lot of courage to keep on going when I dealt a lot of adversity, but we're here. So, if anyone watches this video who hasn't got a payout or a max payout, please use this as motivation, cuz this is very possible. If I could tell I could do it, you could do it. If anyone's curious what I do with the money, all my prop firm money I touch or I make, straight to investments. And yeah, with that being said, see you guys in the next one.\n", "youtube_embed": "https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZV6vXSbyb30" } ] }